Management swing potential for bioenergy crops

Sarah C. Davis, Robert M. Boddey, Bruno J. R. Alves, Annette L. Cowie, Brendan H. George, Stephen M. Ogle, Pete Smith, Meine van Noordwijk, Mark T. van Wijk

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bioenergy crops are often classified (and subsequently regulated) according to species that have been evaluated as environmentally beneficial or detrimental, but in practice, management decisions rather than species per se can determine the overall environmental impact of a bioenergy production system. Here, we review the greenhouse gas balance and management swing potential' of seven different bioenergy cropping systems in temperate and tropical regions. Prior land use, harvesting techniques, harvest timing, and fertilization are among the key management considerations that can swing the greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy from positive to negative or the reverse. Although the management swing potential is substantial for many cropping systems, there are some species (e.g., soybean) that have such low bioenergy yield potentials that the environmental impact is unlikely to be reversed by management. High-yielding bioenergy crops (e.g., corn, sugarcane, Miscanthus, and fast-growing tree species), however, can be managed for environmental benefits or losses, suggesting that the bioenergy sector would be better informed by incorporating management-based evaluations into classifications of bioenergy feedstocks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)623-638
Number of pages16
JournalGlobal Change Biology. Bioenergy
Volume5
Issue number6
Early online date11 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • biofuel
  • corn
  • greenhouse gas
  • legume trees
  • mallee
  • Miscanthus
  • oil palm
  • soybean biodiesel
  • sugarcane
  • Zea mays
  • greenhouse-gas emissions
  • land-use change
  • life-cycle assessment
  • soil organic-carbon
  • miscanthus X giganteus
  • oil production systems
  • palm oil
  • Mallee biomass
  • Western-Australia
  • mitigation options

Cite this

Davis, S. C., Boddey, R. M., Alves, B. J. R., Cowie, A. L., George, B. H., Ogle, S. M., ... van Wijk, M. T. (2013). Management swing potential for bioenergy crops. Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, 5(6), 623-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12042

Management swing potential for bioenergy crops. / Davis, Sarah C.; Boddey, Robert M.; Alves, Bruno J. R.; Cowie, Annette L.; George, Brendan H.; Ogle, Stephen M.; Smith, Pete; van Noordwijk, Meine; van Wijk, Mark T.

In: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Vol. 5, No. 6, 11.2013, p. 623-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Davis, SC, Boddey, RM, Alves, BJR, Cowie, AL, George, BH, Ogle, SM, Smith, P, van Noordwijk, M & van Wijk, MT 2013, 'Management swing potential for bioenergy crops' Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 623-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12042
Davis SC, Boddey RM, Alves BJR, Cowie AL, George BH, Ogle SM et al. Management swing potential for bioenergy crops. Global Change Biology. Bioenergy. 2013 Nov;5(6):623-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12042
Davis, Sarah C. ; Boddey, Robert M. ; Alves, Bruno J. R. ; Cowie, Annette L. ; George, Brendan H. ; Ogle, Stephen M. ; Smith, Pete ; van Noordwijk, Meine ; van Wijk, Mark T. / Management swing potential for bioenergy crops. In: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 6. pp. 623-638.
@article{cb075a8be24b428bb50eeac6d74711d2,
title = "Management swing potential for bioenergy crops",
abstract = "Bioenergy crops are often classified (and subsequently regulated) according to species that have been evaluated as environmentally beneficial or detrimental, but in practice, management decisions rather than species per se can determine the overall environmental impact of a bioenergy production system. Here, we review the greenhouse gas balance and management swing potential' of seven different bioenergy cropping systems in temperate and tropical regions. Prior land use, harvesting techniques, harvest timing, and fertilization are among the key management considerations that can swing the greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy from positive to negative or the reverse. Although the management swing potential is substantial for many cropping systems, there are some species (e.g., soybean) that have such low bioenergy yield potentials that the environmental impact is unlikely to be reversed by management. High-yielding bioenergy crops (e.g., corn, sugarcane, Miscanthus, and fast-growing tree species), however, can be managed for environmental benefits or losses, suggesting that the bioenergy sector would be better informed by incorporating management-based evaluations into classifications of bioenergy feedstocks.",
keywords = "biofuel, corn, greenhouse gas, legume trees, mallee, Miscanthus, oil palm, soybean biodiesel, sugarcane, Zea mays, greenhouse-gas emissions, land-use change, life-cycle assessment, soil organic-carbon, miscanthus X giganteus, oil production systems, palm oil, Mallee biomass, Western-Australia, mitigation options",
author = "Davis, {Sarah C.} and Boddey, {Robert M.} and Alves, {Bruno J. R.} and Cowie, {Annette L.} and George, {Brendan H.} and Ogle, {Stephen M.} and Pete Smith and {van Noordwijk}, Meine and {van Wijk}, {Mark T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12042",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "623--638",
journal = "Global Change Biology. Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management swing potential for bioenergy crops

AU - Davis, Sarah C.

AU - Boddey, Robert M.

AU - Alves, Bruno J. R.

AU - Cowie, Annette L.

AU - George, Brendan H.

AU - Ogle, Stephen M.

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - van Noordwijk, Meine

AU - van Wijk, Mark T.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Bioenergy crops are often classified (and subsequently regulated) according to species that have been evaluated as environmentally beneficial or detrimental, but in practice, management decisions rather than species per se can determine the overall environmental impact of a bioenergy production system. Here, we review the greenhouse gas balance and management swing potential' of seven different bioenergy cropping systems in temperate and tropical regions. Prior land use, harvesting techniques, harvest timing, and fertilization are among the key management considerations that can swing the greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy from positive to negative or the reverse. Although the management swing potential is substantial for many cropping systems, there are some species (e.g., soybean) that have such low bioenergy yield potentials that the environmental impact is unlikely to be reversed by management. High-yielding bioenergy crops (e.g., corn, sugarcane, Miscanthus, and fast-growing tree species), however, can be managed for environmental benefits or losses, suggesting that the bioenergy sector would be better informed by incorporating management-based evaluations into classifications of bioenergy feedstocks.

AB - Bioenergy crops are often classified (and subsequently regulated) according to species that have been evaluated as environmentally beneficial or detrimental, but in practice, management decisions rather than species per se can determine the overall environmental impact of a bioenergy production system. Here, we review the greenhouse gas balance and management swing potential' of seven different bioenergy cropping systems in temperate and tropical regions. Prior land use, harvesting techniques, harvest timing, and fertilization are among the key management considerations that can swing the greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy from positive to negative or the reverse. Although the management swing potential is substantial for many cropping systems, there are some species (e.g., soybean) that have such low bioenergy yield potentials that the environmental impact is unlikely to be reversed by management. High-yielding bioenergy crops (e.g., corn, sugarcane, Miscanthus, and fast-growing tree species), however, can be managed for environmental benefits or losses, suggesting that the bioenergy sector would be better informed by incorporating management-based evaluations into classifications of bioenergy feedstocks.

KW - biofuel

KW - corn

KW - greenhouse gas

KW - legume trees

KW - mallee

KW - Miscanthus

KW - oil palm

KW - soybean biodiesel

KW - sugarcane

KW - Zea mays

KW - greenhouse-gas emissions

KW - land-use change

KW - life-cycle assessment

KW - soil organic-carbon

KW - miscanthus X giganteus

KW - oil production systems

KW - palm oil

KW - Mallee biomass

KW - Western-Australia

KW - mitigation options

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12042

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12042

M3 - Literature review

VL - 5

SP - 623

EP - 638

JO - Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

JF - Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 6

ER -