Marketing and compromising for sustainability

Competing orders of worth in the North Atlantic

John H Finch, Susi Geiger, Rachel Joy Harkness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of our article is to propose that compromising is a constitutive characteristic of those marketing systems that entail matters of public interest or concern. In such markets, actors design compromises as they encounter criticisms of and contending justifications for the market’s products, as these refer to price, efficiency in production and use, regulatory compliance or ecological sustainability. Tests and justifications are vital in order to determine what is valuable and by which measure. As a theory framework, the economic sociology of conventions provides a basis for assessing these contests, compromises, and justifications over the issue of worth in a marketing context. Through an ethnographic study of the regulated activities of chemicals service companies supporting the upstream petroleum industry, we assess how actors evaluate and justify the market’s products and services in this environmentally sensitive setting by means of tests drawing from different orders of worth: the green, the industrial and the market order. Our contributions show that by artful and pragmatic compromising around exchanges, actors in marketing systems can balance several conflicting orders of worth over the question of worth without needing to converge on an overriding institutional logic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-93
Number of pages23
JournalMarketing Theory
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Marketing
Justification
Sustainability
Product market
Compromise
Marketing systems
Regulatory compliance
Price efficiency
Contests
Petroleum industry
Institutional logics
Economic sociology
Criticism
Public interest
Market order

Keywords

  • compromise
  • economics of convention
  • environmental markets
  • market systems
  • orders of worth
  • sustainability
  • valuation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Marketing and compromising for sustainability : Competing orders of worth in the North Atlantic. / Finch, John H; Geiger, Susi; Harkness, Rachel Joy.

In: Marketing Theory, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 71-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finch, John H ; Geiger, Susi ; Harkness, Rachel Joy. / Marketing and compromising for sustainability : Competing orders of worth in the North Atlantic. In: Marketing Theory. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 71-93.
@article{4ba523f8c3dd4b6080f57941457b287b,
title = "Marketing and compromising for sustainability: Competing orders of worth in the North Atlantic",
abstract = "The purpose of our article is to propose that compromising is a constitutive characteristic of those marketing systems that entail matters of public interest or concern. In such markets, actors design compromises as they encounter criticisms of and contending justifications for the market’s products, as these refer to price, efficiency in production and use, regulatory compliance or ecological sustainability. Tests and justifications are vital in order to determine what is valuable and by which measure. As a theory framework, the economic sociology of conventions provides a basis for assessing these contests, compromises, and justifications over the issue of worth in a marketing context. Through an ethnographic study of the regulated activities of chemicals service companies supporting the upstream petroleum industry, we assess how actors evaluate and justify the market’s products and services in this environmentally sensitive setting by means of tests drawing from different orders of worth: the green, the industrial and the market order. Our contributions show that by artful and pragmatic compromising around exchanges, actors in marketing systems can balance several conflicting orders of worth over the question of worth without needing to converge on an overriding institutional logic.",
keywords = "compromise, economics of convention, environmental markets, market systems, orders of worth, sustainability, valuation studies",
author = "Finch, {John H} and Susi Geiger and Harkness, {Rachel Joy}",
note = "Earlier versions were presented at the workshop on Anthropology of Markets and Consumption, University of California Irvine (March 2013) and at the Strategic Management Society’s conference in Glasgow (June 2013). We are grateful to participants at those meetings, our colleagues Thomas Anker and Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou, and Markus Giesler, Eileen Fischer and this journal’s referees for comments and criticisms as we developed this article. The usual disclaimer applies. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: The research upon which this article reports was funded by the Leverhulme Trust, grant F/00 273/N.",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1470593116657924",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "71--93",
journal = "Marketing Theory",
issn = "1470-5931",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marketing and compromising for sustainability

T2 - Competing orders of worth in the North Atlantic

AU - Finch, John H

AU - Geiger, Susi

AU - Harkness, Rachel Joy

N1 - Earlier versions were presented at the workshop on Anthropology of Markets and Consumption, University of California Irvine (March 2013) and at the Strategic Management Society’s conference in Glasgow (June 2013). We are grateful to participants at those meetings, our colleagues Thomas Anker and Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou, and Markus Giesler, Eileen Fischer and this journal’s referees for comments and criticisms as we developed this article. The usual disclaimer applies. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: The research upon which this article reports was funded by the Leverhulme Trust, grant F/00 273/N.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - The purpose of our article is to propose that compromising is a constitutive characteristic of those marketing systems that entail matters of public interest or concern. In such markets, actors design compromises as they encounter criticisms of and contending justifications for the market’s products, as these refer to price, efficiency in production and use, regulatory compliance or ecological sustainability. Tests and justifications are vital in order to determine what is valuable and by which measure. As a theory framework, the economic sociology of conventions provides a basis for assessing these contests, compromises, and justifications over the issue of worth in a marketing context. Through an ethnographic study of the regulated activities of chemicals service companies supporting the upstream petroleum industry, we assess how actors evaluate and justify the market’s products and services in this environmentally sensitive setting by means of tests drawing from different orders of worth: the green, the industrial and the market order. Our contributions show that by artful and pragmatic compromising around exchanges, actors in marketing systems can balance several conflicting orders of worth over the question of worth without needing to converge on an overriding institutional logic.

AB - The purpose of our article is to propose that compromising is a constitutive characteristic of those marketing systems that entail matters of public interest or concern. In such markets, actors design compromises as they encounter criticisms of and contending justifications for the market’s products, as these refer to price, efficiency in production and use, regulatory compliance or ecological sustainability. Tests and justifications are vital in order to determine what is valuable and by which measure. As a theory framework, the economic sociology of conventions provides a basis for assessing these contests, compromises, and justifications over the issue of worth in a marketing context. Through an ethnographic study of the regulated activities of chemicals service companies supporting the upstream petroleum industry, we assess how actors evaluate and justify the market’s products and services in this environmentally sensitive setting by means of tests drawing from different orders of worth: the green, the industrial and the market order. Our contributions show that by artful and pragmatic compromising around exchanges, actors in marketing systems can balance several conflicting orders of worth over the question of worth without needing to converge on an overriding institutional logic.

KW - compromise

KW - economics of convention

KW - environmental markets

KW - market systems

KW - orders of worth

KW - sustainability

KW - valuation studies

U2 - 10.1177/1470593116657924

DO - 10.1177/1470593116657924

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 71

EP - 93

JO - Marketing Theory

JF - Marketing Theory

SN - 1470-5931

IS - 1

ER -