Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach

Alun David Preece, Mario Gomez, Geeth Ranmal De Mel, Wamberto W M P D Vasconcelos, Derek Sleeman, Stuart Colley, Gavin Pearson, Tien Pham, Tom La Porta

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Making decisions on how best to utilise limited intelligence, surveillance and reconnaisance (ISR) resources is a key issue in mission planning. This requires judgements about which kinds of available sensors are more or less appropriate for specific ISR tasks in a mission. A methodological approach to addressing this kind of decision problem in the military context is the Missions and Means Framework (MMF), which provides a structured way to analyse a mission in terms of tasks, and assess the effectiveness of various means for accomplishing those tasks. Moreover, the problem can be defined as knowledge-based matchmaking: matching the ISR requirements of tasks to the ISR-providing capabilities of available sensors. In this paper we show how the MMF can be represented formally as an ontology (that is, a specification of a conceptualisation); we also represent knowledge about ISR requirements and sensors, and then use automated reasoning to solve the matchmaking problem. We adopt the Semantic Web approach and the Web Ontology Language (OWL), allowing us to import elements of existing sensor knowledge bases. Our core ontologies use the description logic subset of OWL, providing efficient reasoning. We describe a prototype tool as a proof-of-concept for our approach. We discuss the various kinds of possible sensor-mission matches, both exact and inexact, and how the tool helps mission planners consider alternative choices of sensors.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDefense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008
PublisherSPIE
Pages98109-98109
Number of pages12
Volume6981
ISBN (Print)9780819471727
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE
PublisherSPIE
ISSN (Print)0277-786X
ISSN (Electronic)1996-756X

Keywords

  • sensor assignment
  • mission planning
  • intelligence
  • surveillance
  • reconnaissance
  • ontologies
  • reasoning
  • intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance

Cite this

Preece, A. D., Gomez, M., De Mel, G. R., Vasconcelos, W. W. M. P. D., Sleeman, D., Colley, S., ... La Porta, T. (2008). Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach. In Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008 (Vol. 6981, pp. 98109-98109). (Proceedings of SPIE). SPIE.

Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach. / Preece, Alun David; Gomez, Mario; De Mel, Geeth Ranmal; Vasconcelos, Wamberto W M P D; Sleeman, Derek; Colley, Stuart; Pearson, Gavin; Pham, Tien; La Porta, Tom.

Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008. Vol. 6981 SPIE, 2008. p. 98109-98109 (Proceedings of SPIE).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Preece, AD, Gomez, M, De Mel, GR, Vasconcelos, WWMPD, Sleeman, D, Colley, S, Pearson, G, Pham, T & La Porta, T 2008, Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach. in Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008. vol. 6981, Proceedings of SPIE, SPIE, pp. 98109-98109.
Preece AD, Gomez M, De Mel GR, Vasconcelos WWMPD, Sleeman D, Colley S et al. Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach. In Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008. Vol. 6981. SPIE. 2008. p. 98109-98109. (Proceedings of SPIE).
Preece, Alun David ; Gomez, Mario ; De Mel, Geeth Ranmal ; Vasconcelos, Wamberto W M P D ; Sleeman, Derek ; Colley, Stuart ; Pearson, Gavin ; Pham, Tien ; La Porta, Tom. / Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach. Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008. Vol. 6981 SPIE, 2008. pp. 98109-98109 (Proceedings of SPIE).
@inbook{6b6e5a3a2af24580a7d832b28a7de080,
title = "Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach",
abstract = "Making decisions on how best to utilise limited intelligence, surveillance and reconnaisance (ISR) resources is a key issue in mission planning. This requires judgements about which kinds of available sensors are more or less appropriate for specific ISR tasks in a mission. A methodological approach to addressing this kind of decision problem in the military context is the Missions and Means Framework (MMF), which provides a structured way to analyse a mission in terms of tasks, and assess the effectiveness of various means for accomplishing those tasks. Moreover, the problem can be defined as knowledge-based matchmaking: matching the ISR requirements of tasks to the ISR-providing capabilities of available sensors. In this paper we show how the MMF can be represented formally as an ontology (that is, a specification of a conceptualisation); we also represent knowledge about ISR requirements and sensors, and then use automated reasoning to solve the matchmaking problem. We adopt the Semantic Web approach and the Web Ontology Language (OWL), allowing us to import elements of existing sensor knowledge bases. Our core ontologies use the description logic subset of OWL, providing efficient reasoning. We describe a prototype tool as a proof-of-concept for our approach. We discuss the various kinds of possible sensor-mission matches, both exact and inexact, and how the tool helps mission planners consider alternative choices of sensors.",
keywords = "sensor assignment, mission planning, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, ontologies, reasoning, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance",
author = "Preece, {Alun David} and Mario Gomez and {De Mel}, {Geeth Ranmal} and Vasconcelos, {Wamberto W M P D} and Derek Sleeman and Stuart Colley and Gavin Pearson and Tien Pham and {La Porta}, Tom",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780819471727",
volume = "6981",
series = "Proceedings of SPIE",
publisher = "SPIE",
pages = "98109--98109",
booktitle = "Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Matching sensors to missions using a knowledge-based approach

AU - Preece, Alun David

AU - Gomez, Mario

AU - De Mel, Geeth Ranmal

AU - Vasconcelos, Wamberto W M P D

AU - Sleeman, Derek

AU - Colley, Stuart

AU - Pearson, Gavin

AU - Pham, Tien

AU - La Porta, Tom

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Making decisions on how best to utilise limited intelligence, surveillance and reconnaisance (ISR) resources is a key issue in mission planning. This requires judgements about which kinds of available sensors are more or less appropriate for specific ISR tasks in a mission. A methodological approach to addressing this kind of decision problem in the military context is the Missions and Means Framework (MMF), which provides a structured way to analyse a mission in terms of tasks, and assess the effectiveness of various means for accomplishing those tasks. Moreover, the problem can be defined as knowledge-based matchmaking: matching the ISR requirements of tasks to the ISR-providing capabilities of available sensors. In this paper we show how the MMF can be represented formally as an ontology (that is, a specification of a conceptualisation); we also represent knowledge about ISR requirements and sensors, and then use automated reasoning to solve the matchmaking problem. We adopt the Semantic Web approach and the Web Ontology Language (OWL), allowing us to import elements of existing sensor knowledge bases. Our core ontologies use the description logic subset of OWL, providing efficient reasoning. We describe a prototype tool as a proof-of-concept for our approach. We discuss the various kinds of possible sensor-mission matches, both exact and inexact, and how the tool helps mission planners consider alternative choices of sensors.

AB - Making decisions on how best to utilise limited intelligence, surveillance and reconnaisance (ISR) resources is a key issue in mission planning. This requires judgements about which kinds of available sensors are more or less appropriate for specific ISR tasks in a mission. A methodological approach to addressing this kind of decision problem in the military context is the Missions and Means Framework (MMF), which provides a structured way to analyse a mission in terms of tasks, and assess the effectiveness of various means for accomplishing those tasks. Moreover, the problem can be defined as knowledge-based matchmaking: matching the ISR requirements of tasks to the ISR-providing capabilities of available sensors. In this paper we show how the MMF can be represented formally as an ontology (that is, a specification of a conceptualisation); we also represent knowledge about ISR requirements and sensors, and then use automated reasoning to solve the matchmaking problem. We adopt the Semantic Web approach and the Web Ontology Language (OWL), allowing us to import elements of existing sensor knowledge bases. Our core ontologies use the description logic subset of OWL, providing efficient reasoning. We describe a prototype tool as a proof-of-concept for our approach. We discuss the various kinds of possible sensor-mission matches, both exact and inexact, and how the tool helps mission planners consider alternative choices of sensors.

KW - sensor assignment

KW - mission planning

KW - intelligence

KW - surveillance

KW - reconnaissance

KW - ontologies

KW - reasoning

KW - intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780819471727

VL - 6981

T3 - Proceedings of SPIE

SP - 98109

EP - 98109

BT - Defense Transformation and Net-Centric Systems 2008

PB - SPIE

ER -