Materials against materiality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

506 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article seeks to reverse the emphasis, in current studies of material culture, on the materiality of objects as against the properties of materials. Drawing on James Gibson's tripartite division of the inhabited environment into medium, substances and surfaces, it is argued that the forms of things are not imposed from without upon an inert substrate of matter, but are continually generated and dissolved within the fluxes of materials across the interface between substances and the medium that surrounds them. Thus things are active not because they are imbued with agency but because of ways in which they are caught up in these currents of the lifeworld. The properties of materials, then, are not fixed attributes of matter but are processual and relational. To describe these properties means telling their stories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalArchaeological Dialogues
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

material culture
substrate
material
properties of materials
Materiality
attribute
Storytelling
Substrate
Material Culture
Life World

Keywords

  • materials
  • landscape
  • artefacts
  • perception
  • agency
  • flux

Cite this

Materials against materiality. / Ingold, Timothy.

In: Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2007, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0bbe165401244b308e04e325ccd272d5,
title = "Materials against materiality",
abstract = "This article seeks to reverse the emphasis, in current studies of material culture, on the materiality of objects as against the properties of materials. Drawing on James Gibson's tripartite division of the inhabited environment into medium, substances and surfaces, it is argued that the forms of things are not imposed from without upon an inert substrate of matter, but are continually generated and dissolved within the fluxes of materials across the interface between substances and the medium that surrounds them. Thus things are active not because they are imbued with agency but because of ways in which they are caught up in these currents of the lifeworld. The properties of materials, then, are not fixed attributes of matter but are processual and relational. To describe these properties means telling their stories.",
keywords = "materials, landscape, artefacts, perception, agency, flux",
author = "Timothy Ingold",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1017/S1380203807002127",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Archaeological Dialogues",
issn = "1380-2038",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Materials against materiality

AU - Ingold, Timothy

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article seeks to reverse the emphasis, in current studies of material culture, on the materiality of objects as against the properties of materials. Drawing on James Gibson's tripartite division of the inhabited environment into medium, substances and surfaces, it is argued that the forms of things are not imposed from without upon an inert substrate of matter, but are continually generated and dissolved within the fluxes of materials across the interface between substances and the medium that surrounds them. Thus things are active not because they are imbued with agency but because of ways in which they are caught up in these currents of the lifeworld. The properties of materials, then, are not fixed attributes of matter but are processual and relational. To describe these properties means telling their stories.

AB - This article seeks to reverse the emphasis, in current studies of material culture, on the materiality of objects as against the properties of materials. Drawing on James Gibson's tripartite division of the inhabited environment into medium, substances and surfaces, it is argued that the forms of things are not imposed from without upon an inert substrate of matter, but are continually generated and dissolved within the fluxes of materials across the interface between substances and the medium that surrounds them. Thus things are active not because they are imbued with agency but because of ways in which they are caught up in these currents of the lifeworld. The properties of materials, then, are not fixed attributes of matter but are processual and relational. To describe these properties means telling their stories.

KW - materials

KW - landscape

KW - artefacts

KW - perception

KW - agency

KW - flux

U2 - 10.1017/S1380203807002127

DO - 10.1017/S1380203807002127

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Archaeological Dialogues

JF - Archaeological Dialogues

SN - 1380-2038

IS - 1

ER -