Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best"

Vanora Hundley, Edwin Roland Van Teijlingen, A. M. Rennie, Wendy Jane Graham, Ann Elizabeth Fitzmaurice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Health policymakers throughout the developed world are paying close attention to factors in maternity care that may influence women's satisfaction. This paper examines some of these factors in the light of observations from previous studies of satisfaction with health services. Methods: The Scottish Birth Study, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, sought the views of all women in Scotland delivering during a 10-day period in 1998. A total of 1,137 women completed and returned questionnaires (response rate = 69%). Results: Women were overwhelmingly satisfied with their prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care. As is common in this type of study, reports of dissatisfaction were relatively low. However, differences occurred in satisfaction levels between subgroups; for example, the fewer the number of caregivers the woman had during childbirth, the more likely she was to be satisfied with the care received. A range of factors appeared to influence reported satisfaction levels, such as characteristics of the care provided and the woman's psychosocial circumstances. Conclusions: In addition to the inherent limitations of satisfaction studies found in the literature, problems may arise if such surveys are used uncritically to shape the future provision of maternity services, because service users tend to value the status quo over innovations of which they have no experience. Therefore, although satisfaction surveys have a role to play, we argue that they should only be used with caution, and preferably as part of an array of tools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages7
JournalBirth: Issues in Perinatal Care
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
  • PATIENT SATISFACTION
  • WOMENS VIEWS
  • MEDICAL-CARE
  • CHILDBIRTH
  • ISSUES
  • LABOR
  • DECISION
  • MOTHERS
  • BIRTHS

Cite this

Hundley, V., Van Teijlingen, E. R., Rennie, A. M., Graham, W. J., & Fitzmaurice, A. E. (2003). Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best". Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 30(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00224.x

Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best". / Hundley, Vanora; Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland; Rennie, A. M.; Graham, Wendy Jane; Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth.

In: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2003, p. 75-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hundley, V, Van Teijlingen, ER, Rennie, AM, Graham, WJ & Fitzmaurice, AE 2003, 'Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best"', Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00224.x
Hundley, Vanora ; Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland ; Rennie, A. M. ; Graham, Wendy Jane ; Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth. / Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best". In: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care. 2003 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 75-82.
@article{b68ca3c172d543258cc50b078824b9f2,
title = "Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: {"}What is, must still be best{"}",
abstract = "Background: Health policymakers throughout the developed world are paying close attention to factors in maternity care that may influence women's satisfaction. This paper examines some of these factors in the light of observations from previous studies of satisfaction with health services. Methods: The Scottish Birth Study, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, sought the views of all women in Scotland delivering during a 10-day period in 1998. A total of 1,137 women completed and returned questionnaires (response rate = 69{\%}). Results: Women were overwhelmingly satisfied with their prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care. As is common in this type of study, reports of dissatisfaction were relatively low. However, differences occurred in satisfaction levels between subgroups; for example, the fewer the number of caregivers the woman had during childbirth, the more likely she was to be satisfied with the care received. A range of factors appeared to influence reported satisfaction levels, such as characteristics of the care provided and the woman's psychosocial circumstances. Conclusions: In addition to the inherent limitations of satisfaction studies found in the literature, problems may arise if such surveys are used uncritically to shape the future provision of maternity services, because service users tend to value the status quo over innovations of which they have no experience. Therefore, although satisfaction surveys have a role to play, we argue that they should only be used with caution, and preferably as part of an array of tools.",
keywords = "RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, PATIENT SATISFACTION, WOMENS VIEWS, MEDICAL-CARE, CHILDBIRTH, ISSUES, LABOR, DECISION, MOTHERS, BIRTHS",
author = "Vanora Hundley and {Van Teijlingen}, {Edwin Roland} and Rennie, {A. M.} and Graham, {Wendy Jane} and Fitzmaurice, {Ann Elizabeth}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00224.x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "75--82",
journal = "Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care",
issn = "0730-7659",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best"

AU - Hundley, Vanora

AU - Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland

AU - Rennie, A. M.

AU - Graham, Wendy Jane

AU - Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Background: Health policymakers throughout the developed world are paying close attention to factors in maternity care that may influence women's satisfaction. This paper examines some of these factors in the light of observations from previous studies of satisfaction with health services. Methods: The Scottish Birth Study, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, sought the views of all women in Scotland delivering during a 10-day period in 1998. A total of 1,137 women completed and returned questionnaires (response rate = 69%). Results: Women were overwhelmingly satisfied with their prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care. As is common in this type of study, reports of dissatisfaction were relatively low. However, differences occurred in satisfaction levels between subgroups; for example, the fewer the number of caregivers the woman had during childbirth, the more likely she was to be satisfied with the care received. A range of factors appeared to influence reported satisfaction levels, such as characteristics of the care provided and the woman's psychosocial circumstances. Conclusions: In addition to the inherent limitations of satisfaction studies found in the literature, problems may arise if such surveys are used uncritically to shape the future provision of maternity services, because service users tend to value the status quo over innovations of which they have no experience. Therefore, although satisfaction surveys have a role to play, we argue that they should only be used with caution, and preferably as part of an array of tools.

AB - Background: Health policymakers throughout the developed world are paying close attention to factors in maternity care that may influence women's satisfaction. This paper examines some of these factors in the light of observations from previous studies of satisfaction with health services. Methods: The Scottish Birth Study, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, sought the views of all women in Scotland delivering during a 10-day period in 1998. A total of 1,137 women completed and returned questionnaires (response rate = 69%). Results: Women were overwhelmingly satisfied with their prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care. As is common in this type of study, reports of dissatisfaction were relatively low. However, differences occurred in satisfaction levels between subgroups; for example, the fewer the number of caregivers the woman had during childbirth, the more likely she was to be satisfied with the care received. A range of factors appeared to influence reported satisfaction levels, such as characteristics of the care provided and the woman's psychosocial circumstances. Conclusions: In addition to the inherent limitations of satisfaction studies found in the literature, problems may arise if such surveys are used uncritically to shape the future provision of maternity services, because service users tend to value the status quo over innovations of which they have no experience. Therefore, although satisfaction surveys have a role to play, we argue that they should only be used with caution, and preferably as part of an array of tools.

KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

KW - PATIENT SATISFACTION

KW - WOMENS VIEWS

KW - MEDICAL-CARE

KW - CHILDBIRTH

KW - ISSUES

KW - LABOR

KW - DECISION

KW - MOTHERS

KW - BIRTHS

U2 - 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00224.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00224.x

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 75

EP - 82

JO - Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care

JF - Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care

SN - 0730-7659

IS - 2

ER -