Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially

Patrick Bernhagen, Andreas Dür, David Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The measurement of the political success of organized interests continues to be among the thornier tasks faced by political scientists. The methodological challenges include determining the preferences of key actors and the extent to which these are satisfied by the policy outcome. We examine how interest group success has been measured in the literature and develop an alternative, spatial approach to measuring lobbying success. We present and compare different spatial measures of success using simulations and new data from the INTEREURO project. We demonstrate that the choice of measurement has implications for the findings generated by studies of interest group success. Assessments of success differ according to whether or not they consider a reversion point. However, different modes of incorporating the reversion point lead to largely similar findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-218
Number of pages17
JournalInterest Groups & Advocacy
Volume3
Issue number2
Early online date15 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

interest group
political scientist
simulation
literature

Keywords

  • interest groups
  • INTEREURO
  • European Union
  • interest group influence
  • lobbying success
  • spatial analysis

Cite this

Bernhagen, P., Dür, A., & Marshall, D. (2014). Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3(2), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.13

Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially. / Bernhagen, Patrick; Dür, Andreas ; Marshall, David.

In: Interest Groups & Advocacy, Vol. 3, No. 2, 06.2014, p. 202-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernhagen, P, Dür, A & Marshall, D 2014, 'Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially' Interest Groups & Advocacy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.13
Bernhagen, Patrick ; Dür, Andreas ; Marshall, David. / Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially. In: Interest Groups & Advocacy. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 202-218.
@article{ade59ba14f804e5ba71f7a1cde80a79d,
title = "Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially",
abstract = "The measurement of the political success of organized interests continues to be among the thornier tasks faced by political scientists. The methodological challenges include determining the preferences of key actors and the extent to which these are satisfied by the policy outcome. We examine how interest group success has been measured in the literature and develop an alternative, spatial approach to measuring lobbying success. We present and compare different spatial measures of success using simulations and new data from the INTEREURO project. We demonstrate that the choice of measurement has implications for the findings generated by studies of interest group success. Assessments of success differ according to whether or not they consider a reversion point. However, different modes of incorporating the reversion point lead to largely similar findings.",
keywords = "interest groups, INTEREURO, European Union, interest group influence, lobbying success, spatial analysis",
author = "Patrick Bernhagen and Andreas D{\"u}r and David Marshall",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1057/iga.2014.13",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "202--218",
journal = "Interest Groups & Advocacy",
issn = "2047-7414",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Lobbying Success Spatially

AU - Bernhagen, Patrick

AU - Dür, Andreas

AU - Marshall, David

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - The measurement of the political success of organized interests continues to be among the thornier tasks faced by political scientists. The methodological challenges include determining the preferences of key actors and the extent to which these are satisfied by the policy outcome. We examine how interest group success has been measured in the literature and develop an alternative, spatial approach to measuring lobbying success. We present and compare different spatial measures of success using simulations and new data from the INTEREURO project. We demonstrate that the choice of measurement has implications for the findings generated by studies of interest group success. Assessments of success differ according to whether or not they consider a reversion point. However, different modes of incorporating the reversion point lead to largely similar findings.

AB - The measurement of the political success of organized interests continues to be among the thornier tasks faced by political scientists. The methodological challenges include determining the preferences of key actors and the extent to which these are satisfied by the policy outcome. We examine how interest group success has been measured in the literature and develop an alternative, spatial approach to measuring lobbying success. We present and compare different spatial measures of success using simulations and new data from the INTEREURO project. We demonstrate that the choice of measurement has implications for the findings generated by studies of interest group success. Assessments of success differ according to whether or not they consider a reversion point. However, different modes of incorporating the reversion point lead to largely similar findings.

KW - interest groups

KW - INTEREURO

KW - European Union

KW - interest group influence

KW - lobbying success

KW - spatial analysis

U2 - 10.1057/iga.2014.13

DO - 10.1057/iga.2014.13

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 202

EP - 218

JO - Interest Groups & Advocacy

JF - Interest Groups & Advocacy

SN - 2047-7414

IS - 2

ER -