Measuring Public Preferences for Health Outcomes and Expenditures in a Context of Healthcare Resource Re-Allocation

Nicolas Krucien (Corresponding Author), Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury, Amiram Gafni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
The final outcome of any resource allocation decision in healthcare cannot be determined in advance. Thus, decision makers, in deciding which new program to implement (or not), need to accommodate the uncertainty of different potential outcomes (i.e., change in both health and costs) that can occur, the size and nature (i.e., ‘bad’ or ‘good’) of these outcomes, and how they are being valued. Using the decision-making plane, which explicitly incorporates opportunity costs and relaxes the assumptions of perfect divisibility and constant returns to scale of the cost-effectiveness plane, all the potential outcomes of each resource allocation decision can be described.

Objective
In this study, we describe the development and testing of an instrument, using a discrete choice experiment methodology, allowing the measurement of public preferences for potential outcomes falling in different quadrants of the decision-making plane.

Method
In a sample of 200 participants providing 4200 observations, we compared four versions of the preference-elicitation instrument using a range of indicators.

Results
We identified one version that was well accepted by the participants and with good measurement properties.

Conclusion
This validated instrument can now be used in a larger representative sample to study the preferences of the public for potential outcomes stemming from re-allocation of healthcare resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-417
Number of pages11
JournalPharmacoeconomics
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date30 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Resource Allocation
Health Expenditures
Public Health
Delivery of Health Care
Decision Making
Health Care Costs
Uncertainty
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Measuring Public Preferences for Health Outcomes and Expenditures in a Context of Healthcare Resource Re-Allocation. / Krucien, Nicolas (Corresponding Author); Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie; Gafni, Amiram.

In: Pharmacoeconomics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 03.2019, p. 407-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krucien, Nicolas ; Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie ; Gafni, Amiram. / Measuring Public Preferences for Health Outcomes and Expenditures in a Context of Healthcare Resource Re-Allocation. In: Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 407-417.
@article{7e488fa763b2400a9743c5ed6c255037,
title = "Measuring Public Preferences for Health Outcomes and Expenditures in a Context of Healthcare Resource Re-Allocation",
abstract = "BackgroundThe final outcome of any resource allocation decision in healthcare cannot be determined in advance. Thus, decision makers, in deciding which new program to implement (or not), need to accommodate the uncertainty of different potential outcomes (i.e., change in both health and costs) that can occur, the size and nature (i.e., ‘bad’ or ‘good’) of these outcomes, and how they are being valued. Using the decision-making plane, which explicitly incorporates opportunity costs and relaxes the assumptions of perfect divisibility and constant returns to scale of the cost-effectiveness plane, all the potential outcomes of each resource allocation decision can be described.ObjectiveIn this study, we describe the development and testing of an instrument, using a discrete choice experiment methodology, allowing the measurement of public preferences for potential outcomes falling in different quadrants of the decision-making plane.MethodIn a sample of 200 participants providing 4200 observations, we compared four versions of the preference-elicitation instrument using a range of indicators.ResultsWe identified one version that was well accepted by the participants and with good measurement properties.ConclusionThis validated instrument can now be used in a larger representative sample to study the preferences of the public for potential outcomes stemming from re-allocation of healthcare resources.",
author = "Nicolas Krucien and Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury and Amiram Gafni",
note = "Financial support for this study was provided by the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM). The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The authors (Nicolas KRUCIEN; Nathalie PELLETIER-FLEURY; Amiram GAFNI) have no conflict of interest to declare.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s40273-018-0751-1",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "407--417",
journal = "Pharmacoeconomics",
issn = "1170-7690",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Public Preferences for Health Outcomes and Expenditures in a Context of Healthcare Resource Re-Allocation

AU - Krucien, Nicolas

AU - Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie

AU - Gafni, Amiram

N1 - Financial support for this study was provided by the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM). The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The authors (Nicolas KRUCIEN; Nathalie PELLETIER-FLEURY; Amiram GAFNI) have no conflict of interest to declare.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - BackgroundThe final outcome of any resource allocation decision in healthcare cannot be determined in advance. Thus, decision makers, in deciding which new program to implement (or not), need to accommodate the uncertainty of different potential outcomes (i.e., change in both health and costs) that can occur, the size and nature (i.e., ‘bad’ or ‘good’) of these outcomes, and how they are being valued. Using the decision-making plane, which explicitly incorporates opportunity costs and relaxes the assumptions of perfect divisibility and constant returns to scale of the cost-effectiveness plane, all the potential outcomes of each resource allocation decision can be described.ObjectiveIn this study, we describe the development and testing of an instrument, using a discrete choice experiment methodology, allowing the measurement of public preferences for potential outcomes falling in different quadrants of the decision-making plane.MethodIn a sample of 200 participants providing 4200 observations, we compared four versions of the preference-elicitation instrument using a range of indicators.ResultsWe identified one version that was well accepted by the participants and with good measurement properties.ConclusionThis validated instrument can now be used in a larger representative sample to study the preferences of the public for potential outcomes stemming from re-allocation of healthcare resources.

AB - BackgroundThe final outcome of any resource allocation decision in healthcare cannot be determined in advance. Thus, decision makers, in deciding which new program to implement (or not), need to accommodate the uncertainty of different potential outcomes (i.e., change in both health and costs) that can occur, the size and nature (i.e., ‘bad’ or ‘good’) of these outcomes, and how they are being valued. Using the decision-making plane, which explicitly incorporates opportunity costs and relaxes the assumptions of perfect divisibility and constant returns to scale of the cost-effectiveness plane, all the potential outcomes of each resource allocation decision can be described.ObjectiveIn this study, we describe the development and testing of an instrument, using a discrete choice experiment methodology, allowing the measurement of public preferences for potential outcomes falling in different quadrants of the decision-making plane.MethodIn a sample of 200 participants providing 4200 observations, we compared four versions of the preference-elicitation instrument using a range of indicators.ResultsWe identified one version that was well accepted by the participants and with good measurement properties.ConclusionThis validated instrument can now be used in a larger representative sample to study the preferences of the public for potential outcomes stemming from re-allocation of healthcare resources.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/measuring-public-preferences-health-outcomes-expenditures-context-healthcare-resource-reallocation

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/measuring-public-preferences-health-outcomes-expenditures-context-healthcare-resource-reallocation-1

U2 - 10.1007/s40273-018-0751-1

DO - 10.1007/s40273-018-0751-1

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 407

EP - 417

JO - Pharmacoeconomics

JF - Pharmacoeconomics

SN - 1170-7690

IS - 3

ER -