Media coverage of the child B case

V.A. Entwistle, I.S. Watt, R. Bradbury, L.J. Pehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The case of a girl with leukaemia, known as Child B, hit the headlines in March 1995 when her father refused to accept the advice of doctors who counselled against further treatment and took Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority to court for refusing to fund chemotherapy and a second bone transplant for her in the private sector. British national newspapers varied greatly in the way they covered the case. Some paid little attention to clinical considerations and presented the case as an example of rationing based on financial considerations. Their selective presentations meant that anyone reading just one newspaper would have received only limited and partial information. If members of the public are to participate in debates about treatment decisions and health care rationing, means other than the media will need to be found to inform and involve them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1587-1591
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume312
Issue number7046
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1996

Fingerprint

Newspapers
Health Care Rationing
Private Sector
Financial Management
Fathers
Reading
Leukemia
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Drug Therapy
Health
Therapeutics
pyrachlostrobin

Cite this

Entwistle, V. A., Watt, I. S., Bradbury, R., & Pehl, L. J. (1996). Media coverage of the child B case. British Medical Journal, 312(7046), 1587-1591.

Media coverage of the child B case. / Entwistle, V.A.; Watt, I.S.; Bradbury, R.; Pehl, L.J.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 312, No. 7046, 01.01.1996, p. 1587-1591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Entwistle, VA, Watt, IS, Bradbury, R & Pehl, LJ 1996, 'Media coverage of the child B case', British Medical Journal, vol. 312, no. 7046, pp. 1587-1591.
Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Bradbury R, Pehl LJ. Media coverage of the child B case. British Medical Journal. 1996 Jan 1;312(7046):1587-1591.
Entwistle, V.A. ; Watt, I.S. ; Bradbury, R. ; Pehl, L.J. / Media coverage of the child B case. In: British Medical Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 312, No. 7046. pp. 1587-1591.
@article{67fdf6055ee9439abbb3ce7d193c57ee,
title = "Media coverage of the child B case",
abstract = "The case of a girl with leukaemia, known as Child B, hit the headlines in March 1995 when her father refused to accept the advice of doctors who counselled against further treatment and took Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority to court for refusing to fund chemotherapy and a second bone transplant for her in the private sector. British national newspapers varied greatly in the way they covered the case. Some paid little attention to clinical considerations and presented the case as an example of rationing based on financial considerations. Their selective presentations meant that anyone reading just one newspaper would have received only limited and partial information. If members of the public are to participate in debates about treatment decisions and health care rationing, means other than the media will need to be found to inform and involve them.",
author = "V.A. Entwistle and I.S. Watt and R. Bradbury and L.J. Pehl",
note = "Medline is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "312",
pages = "1587--1591",
journal = "BMJ",
issn = "0959-8146",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7046",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Media coverage of the child B case

AU - Entwistle, V.A.

AU - Watt, I.S.

AU - Bradbury, R.

AU - Pehl, L.J.

N1 - Medline is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - The case of a girl with leukaemia, known as Child B, hit the headlines in March 1995 when her father refused to accept the advice of doctors who counselled against further treatment and took Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority to court for refusing to fund chemotherapy and a second bone transplant for her in the private sector. British national newspapers varied greatly in the way they covered the case. Some paid little attention to clinical considerations and presented the case as an example of rationing based on financial considerations. Their selective presentations meant that anyone reading just one newspaper would have received only limited and partial information. If members of the public are to participate in debates about treatment decisions and health care rationing, means other than the media will need to be found to inform and involve them.

AB - The case of a girl with leukaemia, known as Child B, hit the headlines in March 1995 when her father refused to accept the advice of doctors who counselled against further treatment and took Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority to court for refusing to fund chemotherapy and a second bone transplant for her in the private sector. British national newspapers varied greatly in the way they covered the case. Some paid little attention to clinical considerations and presented the case as an example of rationing based on financial considerations. Their selective presentations meant that anyone reading just one newspaper would have received only limited and partial information. If members of the public are to participate in debates about treatment decisions and health care rationing, means other than the media will need to be found to inform and involve them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029996896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029996896

VL - 312

SP - 1587

EP - 1591

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

SN - 0959-8146

IS - 7046

ER -