Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other

Kevin Allan, Douglas Martin, Fiona Gabbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Here we demonstrate that the decision to conform to another person’s memory involves a strategic trade-off that balances the accuracy of one’s own memory against that of another person. We showed participants three household scenes, one for 30s, one for 60s and one for 120s. Half were told that they would encode each scene for half as long as their virtual partner, and half were told that they would encode each scene for twice as long as their virtual partner. On a subsequent 2-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) memory test, the simulated answer of the partner (accurate, errant, or no-response) was shown before participants responded. Conformity to the partner’s responses was significantly enhanced for the 30s versus 60s and 120s scenes. This pattern, however, was present only in the group who believed they had encoded each scene for half as long as their partner, even though the short duration scene had the lowest baseline 2AFC accuracy in both groups and was also subjectively rated as the least memorable by both groups. Our reliance on other people’s memory is therefore dynamically and strategically adjusted according to knowledge of the conditions under which we and other people have acquired different memories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-286
Number of pages7
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume40
Issue number2
Early online date15 Sep 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Conformity
Person
Reliance
Household

Keywords

  • memory confirmation
  • metacognition
  • social cognition
  • mental simulation

Cite this

Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other. / Allan, Kevin; Martin, Douglas; Gabbert, Fiona.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 40, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 280-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44d90f41fedb4eb0b28c06a30610f15a,
title = "Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other",
abstract = "Here we demonstrate that the decision to conform to another person’s memory involves a strategic trade-off that balances the accuracy of one’s own memory against that of another person. We showed participants three household scenes, one for 30s, one for 60s and one for 120s. Half were told that they would encode each scene for half as long as their virtual partner, and half were told that they would encode each scene for twice as long as their virtual partner. On a subsequent 2-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) memory test, the simulated answer of the partner (accurate, errant, or no-response) was shown before participants responded. Conformity to the partner’s responses was significantly enhanced for the 30s versus 60s and 120s scenes. This pattern, however, was present only in the group who believed they had encoded each scene for half as long as their partner, even though the short duration scene had the lowest baseline 2AFC accuracy in both groups and was also subjectively rated as the least memorable by both groups. Our reliance on other people’s memory is therefore dynamically and strategically adjusted according to knowledge of the conditions under which we and other people have acquired different memories.",
keywords = "memory confirmation, metacognition, social cognition, mental simulation",
author = "Kevin Allan and Douglas Martin and Fiona Gabbert",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3758/s13421-011-0141-9",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "280--286",
journal = "Memory & Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other

AU - Allan, Kevin

AU - Martin, Douglas

AU - Gabbert, Fiona

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Here we demonstrate that the decision to conform to another person’s memory involves a strategic trade-off that balances the accuracy of one’s own memory against that of another person. We showed participants three household scenes, one for 30s, one for 60s and one for 120s. Half were told that they would encode each scene for half as long as their virtual partner, and half were told that they would encode each scene for twice as long as their virtual partner. On a subsequent 2-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) memory test, the simulated answer of the partner (accurate, errant, or no-response) was shown before participants responded. Conformity to the partner’s responses was significantly enhanced for the 30s versus 60s and 120s scenes. This pattern, however, was present only in the group who believed they had encoded each scene for half as long as their partner, even though the short duration scene had the lowest baseline 2AFC accuracy in both groups and was also subjectively rated as the least memorable by both groups. Our reliance on other people’s memory is therefore dynamically and strategically adjusted according to knowledge of the conditions under which we and other people have acquired different memories.

AB - Here we demonstrate that the decision to conform to another person’s memory involves a strategic trade-off that balances the accuracy of one’s own memory against that of another person. We showed participants three household scenes, one for 30s, one for 60s and one for 120s. Half were told that they would encode each scene for half as long as their virtual partner, and half were told that they would encode each scene for twice as long as their virtual partner. On a subsequent 2-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) memory test, the simulated answer of the partner (accurate, errant, or no-response) was shown before participants responded. Conformity to the partner’s responses was significantly enhanced for the 30s versus 60s and 120s scenes. This pattern, however, was present only in the group who believed they had encoded each scene for half as long as their partner, even though the short duration scene had the lowest baseline 2AFC accuracy in both groups and was also subjectively rated as the least memorable by both groups. Our reliance on other people’s memory is therefore dynamically and strategically adjusted according to knowledge of the conditions under which we and other people have acquired different memories.

KW - memory confirmation

KW - metacognition

KW - social cognition

KW - mental simulation

U2 - 10.3758/s13421-011-0141-9

DO - 10.3758/s13421-011-0141-9

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 280

EP - 286

JO - Memory & Cognition

JF - Memory & Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 2

ER -