Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery

randomized controlled trial of efficacy

Magdalena Ietswaart, Marie Johnston, H Chris Dijkerman, Sara Joice, Clare L Scott, Ronald S MacWalter, Steven J C Hamilton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

157 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the therapeutic benefit of mental practice with motor imagery in stroke patients with persistent upper limb motor weakness. There is evidence to suggest that mental rehearsal of movement can produce effects normally attributed to practising the actual movements. Imagining hand movements could stimulate restitution and redistribution of brain activity, which accompanies recovery of hand function, thus resulting in a reduced motor deficit. Current efficacy evidence for mental practice with motor imagery in stroke is insufficient due to methodological limitations. This randomized controlled sequential cohort study included 121 stroke patients with a residual upper limb weakness within 6 months following stroke (on average <3 months post-stroke). Randomization was performed using an automated statistical minimizing procedure. The primary outcome measure was a blinded rating on the Action Research Arm test. The study analysed the outcome of 39 patients involved in 4 weeks of mental rehearsal of upper limb movements during 45-min supervised sessions three times a week and structured independent sessions twice a week, compared to 31 patients who performed equally intensive non-motor mental rehearsal, and 32 patients receiving normal care without additional training. No differences between the treatment groups were found at baseline or outcome on the Action Research Arm Test (ANCOVA statistical P = 0.77, and effect size partial η2 = 0.005) or any of the secondary outcome measures. Results suggest that mental practice with motor imagery does not enhance motor recovery in patients early post-stroke. In light of the evidence, it remains to be seen whether mental practice with motor imagery is a valid rehabilitation technique in its own right.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1373-1386
Number of pages14
JournalBrain
Volume134
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Randomized Controlled Trials
Stroke
Upper Extremity
Health Services Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Hand
Recovery of Function
Random Allocation
Cohort Studies
Rehabilitation
Brain
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • motor imagery
  • stroke
  • rehabilitation
  • motor recovery
  • plasticity
  • therapeutic benefit

Cite this

Ietswaart, M., Johnston, M., Dijkerman, H. C., Joice, S., Scott, C. L., MacWalter, R. S., & Hamilton, S. J. C. (2011). Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain, 134(5), 1373-1386. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr077

Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery : randomized controlled trial of efficacy. / Ietswaart, Magdalena; Johnston, Marie; Dijkerman, H Chris; Joice, Sara; Scott, Clare L; MacWalter, Ronald S; Hamilton, Steven J C.

In: Brain, Vol. 134, No. 5, 22.04.2011, p. 1373-1386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ietswaart, M, Johnston, M, Dijkerman, HC, Joice, S, Scott, CL, MacWalter, RS & Hamilton, SJC 2011, 'Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy', Brain, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 1373-1386. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr077
Ietswaart, Magdalena ; Johnston, Marie ; Dijkerman, H Chris ; Joice, Sara ; Scott, Clare L ; MacWalter, Ronald S ; Hamilton, Steven J C. / Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery : randomized controlled trial of efficacy. In: Brain. 2011 ; Vol. 134, No. 5. pp. 1373-1386.
@article{bbefb7366bb1448d884b18506ad642ea,
title = "Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy",
abstract = "This randomized controlled trial evaluated the therapeutic benefit of mental practice with motor imagery in stroke patients with persistent upper limb motor weakness. There is evidence to suggest that mental rehearsal of movement can produce effects normally attributed to practising the actual movements. Imagining hand movements could stimulate restitution and redistribution of brain activity, which accompanies recovery of hand function, thus resulting in a reduced motor deficit. Current efficacy evidence for mental practice with motor imagery in stroke is insufficient due to methodological limitations. This randomized controlled sequential cohort study included 121 stroke patients with a residual upper limb weakness within 6 months following stroke (on average <3 months post-stroke). Randomization was performed using an automated statistical minimizing procedure. The primary outcome measure was a blinded rating on the Action Research Arm test. The study analysed the outcome of 39 patients involved in 4 weeks of mental rehearsal of upper limb movements during 45-min supervised sessions three times a week and structured independent sessions twice a week, compared to 31 patients who performed equally intensive non-motor mental rehearsal, and 32 patients receiving normal care without additional training. No differences between the treatment groups were found at baseline or outcome on the Action Research Arm Test (ANCOVA statistical P = 0.77, and effect size partial η2 = 0.005) or any of the secondary outcome measures. Results suggest that mental practice with motor imagery does not enhance motor recovery in patients early post-stroke. In light of the evidence, it remains to be seen whether mental practice with motor imagery is a valid rehabilitation technique in its own right.",
keywords = "motor imagery, stroke, rehabilitation, motor recovery, plasticity, therapeutic benefit",
author = "Magdalena Ietswaart and Marie Johnston and Dijkerman, {H Chris} and Sara Joice and Scott, {Clare L} and MacWalter, {Ronald S} and Hamilton, {Steven J C}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/brain/awr077",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "1373--1386",
journal = "Brain",
issn = "0006-8950",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery

T2 - randomized controlled trial of efficacy

AU - Ietswaart, Magdalena

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Dijkerman, H Chris

AU - Joice, Sara

AU - Scott, Clare L

AU - MacWalter, Ronald S

AU - Hamilton, Steven J C

PY - 2011/4/22

Y1 - 2011/4/22

N2 - This randomized controlled trial evaluated the therapeutic benefit of mental practice with motor imagery in stroke patients with persistent upper limb motor weakness. There is evidence to suggest that mental rehearsal of movement can produce effects normally attributed to practising the actual movements. Imagining hand movements could stimulate restitution and redistribution of brain activity, which accompanies recovery of hand function, thus resulting in a reduced motor deficit. Current efficacy evidence for mental practice with motor imagery in stroke is insufficient due to methodological limitations. This randomized controlled sequential cohort study included 121 stroke patients with a residual upper limb weakness within 6 months following stroke (on average <3 months post-stroke). Randomization was performed using an automated statistical minimizing procedure. The primary outcome measure was a blinded rating on the Action Research Arm test. The study analysed the outcome of 39 patients involved in 4 weeks of mental rehearsal of upper limb movements during 45-min supervised sessions three times a week and structured independent sessions twice a week, compared to 31 patients who performed equally intensive non-motor mental rehearsal, and 32 patients receiving normal care without additional training. No differences between the treatment groups were found at baseline or outcome on the Action Research Arm Test (ANCOVA statistical P = 0.77, and effect size partial η2 = 0.005) or any of the secondary outcome measures. Results suggest that mental practice with motor imagery does not enhance motor recovery in patients early post-stroke. In light of the evidence, it remains to be seen whether mental practice with motor imagery is a valid rehabilitation technique in its own right.

AB - This randomized controlled trial evaluated the therapeutic benefit of mental practice with motor imagery in stroke patients with persistent upper limb motor weakness. There is evidence to suggest that mental rehearsal of movement can produce effects normally attributed to practising the actual movements. Imagining hand movements could stimulate restitution and redistribution of brain activity, which accompanies recovery of hand function, thus resulting in a reduced motor deficit. Current efficacy evidence for mental practice with motor imagery in stroke is insufficient due to methodological limitations. This randomized controlled sequential cohort study included 121 stroke patients with a residual upper limb weakness within 6 months following stroke (on average <3 months post-stroke). Randomization was performed using an automated statistical minimizing procedure. The primary outcome measure was a blinded rating on the Action Research Arm test. The study analysed the outcome of 39 patients involved in 4 weeks of mental rehearsal of upper limb movements during 45-min supervised sessions three times a week and structured independent sessions twice a week, compared to 31 patients who performed equally intensive non-motor mental rehearsal, and 32 patients receiving normal care without additional training. No differences between the treatment groups were found at baseline or outcome on the Action Research Arm Test (ANCOVA statistical P = 0.77, and effect size partial η2 = 0.005) or any of the secondary outcome measures. Results suggest that mental practice with motor imagery does not enhance motor recovery in patients early post-stroke. In light of the evidence, it remains to be seen whether mental practice with motor imagery is a valid rehabilitation technique in its own right.

KW - motor imagery

KW - stroke

KW - rehabilitation

KW - motor recovery

KW - plasticity

KW - therapeutic benefit

U2 - 10.1093/brain/awr077

DO - 10.1093/brain/awr077

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 1373

EP - 1386

JO - Brain

JF - Brain

SN - 0006-8950

IS - 5

ER -