MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans

S. C. Roberts, A. C. Little, L. M. Gosling, Benedict Christopher Jones, D. I. Perrett, V. C. Carter, M. Petrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals tend to choose mates who are sufficiently genetically dissimilar to avoid inbreeding. As facial attractiveness is a key factor in human mate preference, we investigated whether facial preferences were related to genetic dissimilarity. We asked female volunteers to rate the attractiveness of men from photographs and compared these results with individual genotypes at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In contrast to previously reported preferences based on odour, we found a non-significant tendency for women to rate MHC-similar faces as more attractive, suggesting a preference for cues to a self-similar MHC in faces. Further analysis revealed that male faces received higher attractiveness scores when rated by women who were MHC-similar than by MHC-dissimilar women. Although unexpected, this MHC-similar facial preference is consistent with other studies documenting assortative preferences in humans, including for facial phenotype.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-403
Number of pages3
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • mate choice
  • beauty
  • HLA
  • good genes
  • heterozygosity
  • imprinting
  • MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX
  • MATE CHOICE
  • MATING PREFERENCES
  • GENETIC SIMILARITY
  • MENSTRUAL-CYCLE
  • ATTRACTIVENESS
  • SELECTION
  • ODOR
  • HETEROZYGOSITY

Cite this

Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V. C., & Petrie, M. (2005). MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1(4), 400-403. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343

MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. / Roberts, S. C.; Little, A. C.; Gosling, L. M.; Jones, Benedict Christopher; Perrett, D. I.; Carter, V. C.; Petrie, M.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2005, p. 400-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, SC, Little, AC, Gosling, LM, Jones, BC, Perrett, DI, Carter, VC & Petrie, M 2005, 'MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 400-403. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343
Roberts, S. C. ; Little, A. C. ; Gosling, L. M. ; Jones, Benedict Christopher ; Perrett, D. I. ; Carter, V. C. ; Petrie, M. / MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. 2005 ; Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 400-403.
@article{89790cb5a0c843b7afa22031a1d5202e,
title = "MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans",
abstract = "Individuals tend to choose mates who are sufficiently genetically dissimilar to avoid inbreeding. As facial attractiveness is a key factor in human mate preference, we investigated whether facial preferences were related to genetic dissimilarity. We asked female volunteers to rate the attractiveness of men from photographs and compared these results with individual genotypes at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In contrast to previously reported preferences based on odour, we found a non-significant tendency for women to rate MHC-similar faces as more attractive, suggesting a preference for cues to a self-similar MHC in faces. Further analysis revealed that male faces received higher attractiveness scores when rated by women who were MHC-similar than by MHC-dissimilar women. Although unexpected, this MHC-similar facial preference is consistent with other studies documenting assortative preferences in humans, including for facial phenotype.",
keywords = "mate choice, beauty, HLA, good genes, heterozygosity, imprinting, MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX, MATE CHOICE, MATING PREFERENCES, GENETIC SIMILARITY, MENSTRUAL-CYCLE, ATTRACTIVENESS, SELECTION, ODOR, HETEROZYGOSITY",
author = "Roberts, {S. C.} and Little, {A. C.} and Gosling, {L. M.} and Jones, {Benedict Christopher} and Perrett, {D. I.} and Carter, {V. C.} and M. Petrie",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "400--403",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8452",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans

AU - Roberts, S. C.

AU - Little, A. C.

AU - Gosling, L. M.

AU - Jones, Benedict Christopher

AU - Perrett, D. I.

AU - Carter, V. C.

AU - Petrie, M.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Individuals tend to choose mates who are sufficiently genetically dissimilar to avoid inbreeding. As facial attractiveness is a key factor in human mate preference, we investigated whether facial preferences were related to genetic dissimilarity. We asked female volunteers to rate the attractiveness of men from photographs and compared these results with individual genotypes at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In contrast to previously reported preferences based on odour, we found a non-significant tendency for women to rate MHC-similar faces as more attractive, suggesting a preference for cues to a self-similar MHC in faces. Further analysis revealed that male faces received higher attractiveness scores when rated by women who were MHC-similar than by MHC-dissimilar women. Although unexpected, this MHC-similar facial preference is consistent with other studies documenting assortative preferences in humans, including for facial phenotype.

AB - Individuals tend to choose mates who are sufficiently genetically dissimilar to avoid inbreeding. As facial attractiveness is a key factor in human mate preference, we investigated whether facial preferences were related to genetic dissimilarity. We asked female volunteers to rate the attractiveness of men from photographs and compared these results with individual genotypes at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In contrast to previously reported preferences based on odour, we found a non-significant tendency for women to rate MHC-similar faces as more attractive, suggesting a preference for cues to a self-similar MHC in faces. Further analysis revealed that male faces received higher attractiveness scores when rated by women who were MHC-similar than by MHC-dissimilar women. Although unexpected, this MHC-similar facial preference is consistent with other studies documenting assortative preferences in humans, including for facial phenotype.

KW - mate choice

KW - beauty

KW - HLA

KW - good genes

KW - heterozygosity

KW - imprinting

KW - MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX

KW - MATE CHOICE

KW - MATING PREFERENCES

KW - GENETIC SIMILARITY

KW - MENSTRUAL-CYCLE

KW - ATTRACTIVENESS

KW - SELECTION

KW - ODOR

KW - HETEROZYGOSITY

U2 - 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343

DO - 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 400

EP - 403

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8452

IS - 4

ER -