Migration, Prospecting, Dispersal? What Host Movement Matters for Infectious Agent Circulation?

Thierry Boulinier* (Corresponding Author), Sarah Kada, Aurore Ponchon, Marlene Dupraz, Muriel Dietrich, Amandine Gamble, Vincent Bourret, Olivier Duriez, Romain Bazire, Jeremy Tornos, Torkild Tveraa, Thierry Chambert, Romain Garnier, Karen D. McCoy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial disease ecology is emerging as a new field that requires the integration of complementary approaches to address how the distribution and movements of hosts and parasites may condition the dynamics of their interactions. In this context, migration, the seasonal movement of animals to different zones of their distribution, is assumed to play a key role in the broad scale circulation of parasites and pathogens. Nevertheless, migration is not the only type of host movement that can influence the spatial ecology, evolution, and epidemiology of infectious diseases. Dispersal, the movement of individuals between the location where they were born or bred to a location where they breed, has attracted attention as another important type of movement for the spatial dynamics of infectious diseases. Host dispersal has notably been identified as a key factor for the evolution of host-parasite interactions as it implies gene flow among local host populations and thus can alter patterns of coevolution with infectious agents across spatial scales. However, not all movements between host populations lead to dispersal per se. One type of host movement that has been neglected, but that may also play a role in parasite spread is prospecting, i.e., movements targeted at selecting and securing new habitat for future breeding. Prospecting movements, which have been studied in detail in certain social species, could result in the dispersal of infectious agents among different host populations without necessarily involving host dispersal. In this article, we outline how these various types of host movements might influence the circulation of infectious disease agents and discuss methodological approaches that could be used to assess their importance. We specifically focus on examples from work on colonial seabirds, ticks, and tick-borne infectious agents. These are convenient biological models because they are strongly spatially structured and involve relatively simple communities of interacting species. Overall, this review emphasizes that explicit consideration of the behavioral and population ecology of hosts and parasites is required to disentangle the relative roles of different types of movement for the spread of infectious diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-342
Number of pages13
JournalIntegrative and Comparative Biology
Volume56
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Cite this

Migration, Prospecting, Dispersal? What Host Movement Matters for Infectious Agent Circulation? / Boulinier, Thierry (Corresponding Author); Kada, Sarah; Ponchon, Aurore; Dupraz, Marlene; Dietrich, Muriel; Gamble, Amandine; Bourret, Vincent; Duriez, Olivier; Bazire, Romain; Tornos, Jeremy; Tveraa, Torkild; Chambert, Thierry; Garnier, Romain; McCoy, Karen D.

In: Integrative and Comparative Biology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.08.2016, p. 330-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boulinier, T, Kada, S, Ponchon, A, Dupraz, M, Dietrich, M, Gamble, A, Bourret, V, Duriez, O, Bazire, R, Tornos, J, Tveraa, T, Chambert, T, Garnier, R & McCoy, KD 2016, 'Migration, Prospecting, Dispersal? What Host Movement Matters for Infectious Agent Circulation?', Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 330-342. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icw015
Boulinier, Thierry ; Kada, Sarah ; Ponchon, Aurore ; Dupraz, Marlene ; Dietrich, Muriel ; Gamble, Amandine ; Bourret, Vincent ; Duriez, Olivier ; Bazire, Romain ; Tornos, Jeremy ; Tveraa, Torkild ; Chambert, Thierry ; Garnier, Romain ; McCoy, Karen D. / Migration, Prospecting, Dispersal? What Host Movement Matters for Infectious Agent Circulation?. In: Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2016 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 330-342.
@article{1481944e3b4e40628917d479f196cb04,
title = "Migration, Prospecting, Dispersal? What Host Movement Matters for Infectious Agent Circulation?",
abstract = "Spatial disease ecology is emerging as a new field that requires the integration of complementary approaches to address how the distribution and movements of hosts and parasites may condition the dynamics of their interactions. In this context, migration, the seasonal movement of animals to different zones of their distribution, is assumed to play a key role in the broad scale circulation of parasites and pathogens. Nevertheless, migration is not the only type of host movement that can influence the spatial ecology, evolution, and epidemiology of infectious diseases. Dispersal, the movement of individuals between the location where they were born or bred to a location where they breed, has attracted attention as another important type of movement for the spatial dynamics of infectious diseases. Host dispersal has notably been identified as a key factor for the evolution of host-parasite interactions as it implies gene flow among local host populations and thus can alter patterns of coevolution with infectious agents across spatial scales. However, not all movements between host populations lead to dispersal per se. One type of host movement that has been neglected, but that may also play a role in parasite spread is prospecting, i.e., movements targeted at selecting and securing new habitat for future breeding. Prospecting movements, which have been studied in detail in certain social species, could result in the dispersal of infectious agents among different host populations without necessarily involving host dispersal. In this article, we outline how these various types of host movements might influence the circulation of infectious disease agents and discuss methodological approaches that could be used to assess their importance. We specifically focus on examples from work on colonial seabirds, ticks, and tick-borne infectious agents. These are convenient biological models because they are strongly spatially structured and involve relatively simple communities of interacting species. Overall, this review emphasizes that explicit consideration of the behavioral and population ecology of hosts and parasites is required to disentangle the relative roles of different types of movement for the spread of infectious diseases.",
author = "Thierry Boulinier and Sarah Kada and Aurore Ponchon and Marlene Dupraz and Muriel Dietrich and Amandine Gamble and Vincent Bourret and Olivier Duriez and Romain Bazire and Jeremy Tornos and Torkild Tveraa and Thierry Chambert and Romain Garnier and McCoy, {Karen D.}",
note = "Acknowledgments We thank David Gremillet, Jacob Gonzalez-Solis, Raul Ramos, Elena Gomez-Diaz, Christophe Barbraud, Henri Weimerskirch, Karine Delord, Cedric Marteau, Elisa Lobato Celine Toty, and Nicolas Giraud for help on different aspects of this work. We also thank Alexa McKay and Bethany Hoye for organizing the SICB symposium where we presented this review. Funding We acknowledge support from ANR (EVEMATA and ESPEVEC grants, respectively ANR-11-BSV7-003 and ANR-13-BSV7-0018), French Polar Institute (IPEV) programs n8333 (PARASITO-ARCTIQUE) and n81151 (ECOPATH), OSU OREME and ZATA. M.D. postdoctoral fellowship is funded by the National Research Foundation, South Africa (NRF - N00595). R.G. acknowledges support from an AXA Research Fund postdoctoral grant and V.B. from a LabEx CeMEB (Mediterranean Centre for Environment and Biodiversity) postdoctoral grant. The work involving animals in the field was approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority, the Comite de l’Environnement Polaire and the Reserve Nationale Naturelle des Terres Australes et Antarctiques Francaises.",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/icb/icw015",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "330--342",
journal = "Integrative and Comparative Biology",
issn = "1540-7063",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Migration, Prospecting, Dispersal? What Host Movement Matters for Infectious Agent Circulation?

AU - Boulinier, Thierry

AU - Kada, Sarah

AU - Ponchon, Aurore

AU - Dupraz, Marlene

AU - Dietrich, Muriel

AU - Gamble, Amandine

AU - Bourret, Vincent

AU - Duriez, Olivier

AU - Bazire, Romain

AU - Tornos, Jeremy

AU - Tveraa, Torkild

AU - Chambert, Thierry

AU - Garnier, Romain

AU - McCoy, Karen D.

N1 - Acknowledgments We thank David Gremillet, Jacob Gonzalez-Solis, Raul Ramos, Elena Gomez-Diaz, Christophe Barbraud, Henri Weimerskirch, Karine Delord, Cedric Marteau, Elisa Lobato Celine Toty, and Nicolas Giraud for help on different aspects of this work. We also thank Alexa McKay and Bethany Hoye for organizing the SICB symposium where we presented this review. Funding We acknowledge support from ANR (EVEMATA and ESPEVEC grants, respectively ANR-11-BSV7-003 and ANR-13-BSV7-0018), French Polar Institute (IPEV) programs n8333 (PARASITO-ARCTIQUE) and n81151 (ECOPATH), OSU OREME and ZATA. M.D. postdoctoral fellowship is funded by the National Research Foundation, South Africa (NRF - N00595). R.G. acknowledges support from an AXA Research Fund postdoctoral grant and V.B. from a LabEx CeMEB (Mediterranean Centre for Environment and Biodiversity) postdoctoral grant. The work involving animals in the field was approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority, the Comite de l’Environnement Polaire and the Reserve Nationale Naturelle des Terres Australes et Antarctiques Francaises.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Spatial disease ecology is emerging as a new field that requires the integration of complementary approaches to address how the distribution and movements of hosts and parasites may condition the dynamics of their interactions. In this context, migration, the seasonal movement of animals to different zones of their distribution, is assumed to play a key role in the broad scale circulation of parasites and pathogens. Nevertheless, migration is not the only type of host movement that can influence the spatial ecology, evolution, and epidemiology of infectious diseases. Dispersal, the movement of individuals between the location where they were born or bred to a location where they breed, has attracted attention as another important type of movement for the spatial dynamics of infectious diseases. Host dispersal has notably been identified as a key factor for the evolution of host-parasite interactions as it implies gene flow among local host populations and thus can alter patterns of coevolution with infectious agents across spatial scales. However, not all movements between host populations lead to dispersal per se. One type of host movement that has been neglected, but that may also play a role in parasite spread is prospecting, i.e., movements targeted at selecting and securing new habitat for future breeding. Prospecting movements, which have been studied in detail in certain social species, could result in the dispersal of infectious agents among different host populations without necessarily involving host dispersal. In this article, we outline how these various types of host movements might influence the circulation of infectious disease agents and discuss methodological approaches that could be used to assess their importance. We specifically focus on examples from work on colonial seabirds, ticks, and tick-borne infectious agents. These are convenient biological models because they are strongly spatially structured and involve relatively simple communities of interacting species. Overall, this review emphasizes that explicit consideration of the behavioral and population ecology of hosts and parasites is required to disentangle the relative roles of different types of movement for the spread of infectious diseases.

AB - Spatial disease ecology is emerging as a new field that requires the integration of complementary approaches to address how the distribution and movements of hosts and parasites may condition the dynamics of their interactions. In this context, migration, the seasonal movement of animals to different zones of their distribution, is assumed to play a key role in the broad scale circulation of parasites and pathogens. Nevertheless, migration is not the only type of host movement that can influence the spatial ecology, evolution, and epidemiology of infectious diseases. Dispersal, the movement of individuals between the location where they were born or bred to a location where they breed, has attracted attention as another important type of movement for the spatial dynamics of infectious diseases. Host dispersal has notably been identified as a key factor for the evolution of host-parasite interactions as it implies gene flow among local host populations and thus can alter patterns of coevolution with infectious agents across spatial scales. However, not all movements between host populations lead to dispersal per se. One type of host movement that has been neglected, but that may also play a role in parasite spread is prospecting, i.e., movements targeted at selecting and securing new habitat for future breeding. Prospecting movements, which have been studied in detail in certain social species, could result in the dispersal of infectious agents among different host populations without necessarily involving host dispersal. In this article, we outline how these various types of host movements might influence the circulation of infectious disease agents and discuss methodological approaches that could be used to assess their importance. We specifically focus on examples from work on colonial seabirds, ticks, and tick-borne infectious agents. These are convenient biological models because they are strongly spatially structured and involve relatively simple communities of interacting species. Overall, this review emphasizes that explicit consideration of the behavioral and population ecology of hosts and parasites is required to disentangle the relative roles of different types of movement for the spread of infectious diseases.

U2 - 10.1093/icb/icw015

DO - 10.1093/icb/icw015

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 330

EP - 342

JO - Integrative and Comparative Biology

JF - Integrative and Comparative Biology

SN - 1540-7063

IS - 2

ER -