Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics

Alex L Jones, Robin S S Kramer, Robert Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Women use cosmetics to enhance their attractiveness. How successful they are in doing so remains unknown--how do men and women respond to cosmetics use in terms of attractiveness? There are a variety of miscalibrations where attractiveness is concerned--often, what one sex thinks the opposite sex finds attractive is incorrect. Here, we investigated observer perceptions about attractiveness and cosmetics, as well as their understanding of what others would find attractive. We used computer graphic techniques to allow observers to vary the amount of cosmetics applied to a series of female faces. We asked observers to optimize attractiveness for themselves, for what they thought women in general would prefer, and what they thought men in general would prefer. We found that men and women agree on the amount of cosmetics they find attractive, but overestimate the preferences of women and, when considering the preferences of men, overestimate even more. We also find that models' self-applied cosmetics are far in excess of individual preferences. These findings suggest that attractiveness perceptions with cosmetics are a form of pluralistic ignorance, whereby women tailor their cosmetics use to an inaccurate perception of others' preferences. These findings also highlight further miscalibrations of attractiveness ideals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2060-2068
Number of pages9
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume67
Issue number10
Early online date22 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Cosmetics
Computer Graphics

Keywords

  • faces
  • attractiveness
  • cosmetics
  • social cognition
  • pluralistic ignorance

Cite this

Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics. / Jones, Alex L; Kramer, Robin S S; Ward, Robert.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 10, 10.2014, p. 2060-2068.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jones, Alex L ; Kramer, Robin S S ; Ward, Robert. / Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 67, No. 10. pp. 2060-2068.
@article{f0a9e6ac19ab47e8b343e11d642c6b48,
title = "Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics",
abstract = "Women use cosmetics to enhance their attractiveness. How successful they are in doing so remains unknown--how do men and women respond to cosmetics use in terms of attractiveness? There are a variety of miscalibrations where attractiveness is concerned--often, what one sex thinks the opposite sex finds attractive is incorrect. Here, we investigated observer perceptions about attractiveness and cosmetics, as well as their understanding of what others would find attractive. We used computer graphic techniques to allow observers to vary the amount of cosmetics applied to a series of female faces. We asked observers to optimize attractiveness for themselves, for what they thought women in general would prefer, and what they thought men in general would prefer. We found that men and women agree on the amount of cosmetics they find attractive, but overestimate the preferences of women and, when considering the preferences of men, overestimate even more. We also find that models' self-applied cosmetics are far in excess of individual preferences. These findings suggest that attractiveness perceptions with cosmetics are a form of pluralistic ignorance, whereby women tailor their cosmetics use to an inaccurate perception of others' preferences. These findings also highlight further miscalibrations of attractiveness ideals.",
keywords = "faces, attractiveness, cosmetics, social cognition, pluralistic ignorance",
author = "Jones, {Alex L} and Kramer, {Robin S S} and Robert Ward",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2014.908932",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "2060--2068",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics

AU - Jones, Alex L

AU - Kramer, Robin S S

AU - Ward, Robert

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - Women use cosmetics to enhance their attractiveness. How successful they are in doing so remains unknown--how do men and women respond to cosmetics use in terms of attractiveness? There are a variety of miscalibrations where attractiveness is concerned--often, what one sex thinks the opposite sex finds attractive is incorrect. Here, we investigated observer perceptions about attractiveness and cosmetics, as well as their understanding of what others would find attractive. We used computer graphic techniques to allow observers to vary the amount of cosmetics applied to a series of female faces. We asked observers to optimize attractiveness for themselves, for what they thought women in general would prefer, and what they thought men in general would prefer. We found that men and women agree on the amount of cosmetics they find attractive, but overestimate the preferences of women and, when considering the preferences of men, overestimate even more. We also find that models' self-applied cosmetics are far in excess of individual preferences. These findings suggest that attractiveness perceptions with cosmetics are a form of pluralistic ignorance, whereby women tailor their cosmetics use to an inaccurate perception of others' preferences. These findings also highlight further miscalibrations of attractiveness ideals.

AB - Women use cosmetics to enhance their attractiveness. How successful they are in doing so remains unknown--how do men and women respond to cosmetics use in terms of attractiveness? There are a variety of miscalibrations where attractiveness is concerned--often, what one sex thinks the opposite sex finds attractive is incorrect. Here, we investigated observer perceptions about attractiveness and cosmetics, as well as their understanding of what others would find attractive. We used computer graphic techniques to allow observers to vary the amount of cosmetics applied to a series of female faces. We asked observers to optimize attractiveness for themselves, for what they thought women in general would prefer, and what they thought men in general would prefer. We found that men and women agree on the amount of cosmetics they find attractive, but overestimate the preferences of women and, when considering the preferences of men, overestimate even more. We also find that models' self-applied cosmetics are far in excess of individual preferences. These findings suggest that attractiveness perceptions with cosmetics are a form of pluralistic ignorance, whereby women tailor their cosmetics use to an inaccurate perception of others' preferences. These findings also highlight further miscalibrations of attractiveness ideals.

KW - faces

KW - attractiveness

KW - cosmetics

KW - social cognition

KW - pluralistic ignorance

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2014.908932

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2014.908932

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 2060

EP - 2068

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 10

ER -