Missed by and inch or a mile?

Predicting size of intention-behaviour gap from measures of executive control

Julia Louise Allan, Marie Johnston, Neil Crawford Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Failing to achieve healthy intentions can have a direct impact on subsequent health. The extent of this impact is partially determined by the size of the discrepancy between intentions and behaviour, that is, on whether an unachieved behavioural target is missed by an inch or a mile. Over two studies, measures of 'executive control' ability were used to predict the size of the intention-behaviour gap for two dietary behaviours - eating fruits and vegetables and snacking. In Study 1, participants (n¿=¿50) reported intended dietary intake, completed objective and self-report measures of executive control ability and recorded actual dietary intake over 3 days with computerised diaries. Using multiple regression, general executive control ability was found to account for 16-23% of the variance in the size of intention-behaviour gap for both the dietary behaviours. In Study 2 (n¿=¿52), deviation from intentions about snacking was significantly related to individual differences in prepotent response inhibition. Overall, individuals with weak executive control ate less fruits and vegetables and more snacks than intended. Intention-behaviour 'failures' are not homogenous, but instead vary predictably with the availability of executive control resources. This suggests that individuals with large intention-behaviour shortfalls may benefit from interventions designed to reduce the demands on executive control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)635-650
Number of pages16
JournalPsychology & Health
Volume26
Issue number6
Early online date24 May 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Executive Function
Snacks
Aptitude
Vegetables
Fruit
Feeding Behavior
Individuality
Self Report
Health

Keywords

  • intention–behaviour gap
  • diet
  • executive control
  • snacking
  • fruits and vegetables

Cite this

Missed by and inch or a mile? Predicting size of intention-behaviour gap from measures of executive control. / Allan, Julia Louise; Johnston, Marie; Campbell, Neil Crawford.

In: Psychology & Health, Vol. 26, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 635-650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d62bd27f7abb4e25a03482beabeb1b7b,
title = "Missed by and inch or a mile?: Predicting size of intention-behaviour gap from measures of executive control",
abstract = "Failing to achieve healthy intentions can have a direct impact on subsequent health. The extent of this impact is partially determined by the size of the discrepancy between intentions and behaviour, that is, on whether an unachieved behavioural target is missed by an inch or a mile. Over two studies, measures of 'executive control' ability were used to predict the size of the intention-behaviour gap for two dietary behaviours - eating fruits and vegetables and snacking. In Study 1, participants (n¿=¿50) reported intended dietary intake, completed objective and self-report measures of executive control ability and recorded actual dietary intake over 3 days with computerised diaries. Using multiple regression, general executive control ability was found to account for 16-23{\%} of the variance in the size of intention-behaviour gap for both the dietary behaviours. In Study 2 (n¿=¿52), deviation from intentions about snacking was significantly related to individual differences in prepotent response inhibition. Overall, individuals with weak executive control ate less fruits and vegetables and more snacks than intended. Intention-behaviour 'failures' are not homogenous, but instead vary predictably with the availability of executive control resources. This suggests that individuals with large intention-behaviour shortfalls may benefit from interventions designed to reduce the demands on executive control.",
keywords = "intention–behaviour gap, diet, executive control, snacking , fruits and vegetables",
author = "Allan, {Julia Louise} and Marie Johnston and Campbell, {Neil Crawford}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/08870441003681307",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "635--650",
journal = "Psychology & Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missed by and inch or a mile?

T2 - Predicting size of intention-behaviour gap from measures of executive control

AU - Allan, Julia Louise

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Campbell, Neil Crawford

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Failing to achieve healthy intentions can have a direct impact on subsequent health. The extent of this impact is partially determined by the size of the discrepancy between intentions and behaviour, that is, on whether an unachieved behavioural target is missed by an inch or a mile. Over two studies, measures of 'executive control' ability were used to predict the size of the intention-behaviour gap for two dietary behaviours - eating fruits and vegetables and snacking. In Study 1, participants (n¿=¿50) reported intended dietary intake, completed objective and self-report measures of executive control ability and recorded actual dietary intake over 3 days with computerised diaries. Using multiple regression, general executive control ability was found to account for 16-23% of the variance in the size of intention-behaviour gap for both the dietary behaviours. In Study 2 (n¿=¿52), deviation from intentions about snacking was significantly related to individual differences in prepotent response inhibition. Overall, individuals with weak executive control ate less fruits and vegetables and more snacks than intended. Intention-behaviour 'failures' are not homogenous, but instead vary predictably with the availability of executive control resources. This suggests that individuals with large intention-behaviour shortfalls may benefit from interventions designed to reduce the demands on executive control.

AB - Failing to achieve healthy intentions can have a direct impact on subsequent health. The extent of this impact is partially determined by the size of the discrepancy between intentions and behaviour, that is, on whether an unachieved behavioural target is missed by an inch or a mile. Over two studies, measures of 'executive control' ability were used to predict the size of the intention-behaviour gap for two dietary behaviours - eating fruits and vegetables and snacking. In Study 1, participants (n¿=¿50) reported intended dietary intake, completed objective and self-report measures of executive control ability and recorded actual dietary intake over 3 days with computerised diaries. Using multiple regression, general executive control ability was found to account for 16-23% of the variance in the size of intention-behaviour gap for both the dietary behaviours. In Study 2 (n¿=¿52), deviation from intentions about snacking was significantly related to individual differences in prepotent response inhibition. Overall, individuals with weak executive control ate less fruits and vegetables and more snacks than intended. Intention-behaviour 'failures' are not homogenous, but instead vary predictably with the availability of executive control resources. This suggests that individuals with large intention-behaviour shortfalls may benefit from interventions designed to reduce the demands on executive control.

KW - intention–behaviour gap

KW - diet

KW - executive control

KW - snacking

KW - fruits and vegetables

U2 - 10.1080/08870441003681307

DO - 10.1080/08870441003681307

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 635

EP - 650

JO - Psychology & Health

JF - Psychology & Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 6

ER -