MOBILE and the provision of total joint replacement

MOBILE Research Team

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Modern joint replacements have been available for 45 years, but we still do not have clear indications for these interventions, and we do not know how to optimize the outcome for patients who agree to have them done. The MOBILE programme has been investigating these issues in relation to primary total hip and knee joint replacements, using mixed methods research.
There have been five main strands:
Epidemiological investigations to find out who is receiving total hip and knee replacements in the National Health Service (NHS). This has shown that there are extensive variations in different regions of the UK, with inequalities and probable inequities in the provision of these operations;
Epidemiological work to ascertain the population-based needs for the operations, showing under-provision of knee joint replacements, and a relative reluctance of both patients and GPs to consider knee surgery;
Quantitative and qualitative research into the views of patients, health care professionals and the public on the indications for, and prioritization of, total hip and knee joint replacements. This has shown lack of agreement within or between professional groups, as well as a mismatch between the views of patients and the public, and those of professionals;
Theoretical and experimental work on patient-related outcome measures, and the development of new instruments to assess both pain and function in people with osteoarthritis, based on the International Classification of Function, as well as a new integrated model of function;
Cohort studies of patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacements to find out what the determinants of good and bad outcomes are. These studies have emphasized the huge variation in disease severity at the time of surgery.
The challenge now is to use and implement our findings for maximum patient benefit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Health Services Research & Policy
Volume13
Issue numberSuppl. 3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Replacement Arthroplasties
Knee Joint
Hip Joint
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Hip Replacement Arthroplasties
Qualitative Research
National Health Programs
Osteoarthritis
Knee
Patient Care
Cohort Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
Pain
Research

Cite this

MOBILE and the provision of total joint replacement. / MOBILE Research Team.

In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 13, No. Suppl. 3, 10.2008, p. 47-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MOBILE Research Team. / MOBILE and the provision of total joint replacement. In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2008 ; Vol. 13, No. Suppl. 3. pp. 47-56.
@article{475c69b24d6c4e3f90ee48619e056b5b,
title = "MOBILE and the provision of total joint replacement",
abstract = "Modern joint replacements have been available for 45 years, but we still do not have clear indications for these interventions, and we do not know how to optimize the outcome for patients who agree to have them done. The MOBILE programme has been investigating these issues in relation to primary total hip and knee joint replacements, using mixed methods research.There have been five main strands:Epidemiological investigations to find out who is receiving total hip and knee replacements in the National Health Service (NHS). This has shown that there are extensive variations in different regions of the UK, with inequalities and probable inequities in the provision of these operations;Epidemiological work to ascertain the population-based needs for the operations, showing under-provision of knee joint replacements, and a relative reluctance of both patients and GPs to consider knee surgery;Quantitative and qualitative research into the views of patients, health care professionals and the public on the indications for, and prioritization of, total hip and knee joint replacements. This has shown lack of agreement within or between professional groups, as well as a mismatch between the views of patients and the public, and those of professionals;Theoretical and experimental work on patient-related outcome measures, and the development of new instruments to assess both pain and function in people with osteoarthritis, based on the International Classification of Function, as well as a new integrated model of function;Cohort studies of patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacements to find out what the determinants of good and bad outcomes are. These studies have emphasized the huge variation in disease severity at the time of surgery.The challenge now is to use and implement our findings for maximum patient benefit.",
author = "Paul Dieppe and Diane Dixon and Jeremy Horwood and Beth Pollard and Marie Johnston and {MOBILE Research Team}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008018",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "47--56",
journal = "Journal of Health Services Research & Policy",
issn = "1355-8196",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "Suppl. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MOBILE and the provision of total joint replacement

AU - Dieppe, Paul

AU - Dixon, Diane

AU - Horwood, Jeremy

AU - Pollard, Beth

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - MOBILE Research Team

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Modern joint replacements have been available for 45 years, but we still do not have clear indications for these interventions, and we do not know how to optimize the outcome for patients who agree to have them done. The MOBILE programme has been investigating these issues in relation to primary total hip and knee joint replacements, using mixed methods research.There have been five main strands:Epidemiological investigations to find out who is receiving total hip and knee replacements in the National Health Service (NHS). This has shown that there are extensive variations in different regions of the UK, with inequalities and probable inequities in the provision of these operations;Epidemiological work to ascertain the population-based needs for the operations, showing under-provision of knee joint replacements, and a relative reluctance of both patients and GPs to consider knee surgery;Quantitative and qualitative research into the views of patients, health care professionals and the public on the indications for, and prioritization of, total hip and knee joint replacements. This has shown lack of agreement within or between professional groups, as well as a mismatch between the views of patients and the public, and those of professionals;Theoretical and experimental work on patient-related outcome measures, and the development of new instruments to assess both pain and function in people with osteoarthritis, based on the International Classification of Function, as well as a new integrated model of function;Cohort studies of patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacements to find out what the determinants of good and bad outcomes are. These studies have emphasized the huge variation in disease severity at the time of surgery.The challenge now is to use and implement our findings for maximum patient benefit.

AB - Modern joint replacements have been available for 45 years, but we still do not have clear indications for these interventions, and we do not know how to optimize the outcome for patients who agree to have them done. The MOBILE programme has been investigating these issues in relation to primary total hip and knee joint replacements, using mixed methods research.There have been five main strands:Epidemiological investigations to find out who is receiving total hip and knee replacements in the National Health Service (NHS). This has shown that there are extensive variations in different regions of the UK, with inequalities and probable inequities in the provision of these operations;Epidemiological work to ascertain the population-based needs for the operations, showing under-provision of knee joint replacements, and a relative reluctance of both patients and GPs to consider knee surgery;Quantitative and qualitative research into the views of patients, health care professionals and the public on the indications for, and prioritization of, total hip and knee joint replacements. This has shown lack of agreement within or between professional groups, as well as a mismatch between the views of patients and the public, and those of professionals;Theoretical and experimental work on patient-related outcome measures, and the development of new instruments to assess both pain and function in people with osteoarthritis, based on the International Classification of Function, as well as a new integrated model of function;Cohort studies of patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacements to find out what the determinants of good and bad outcomes are. These studies have emphasized the huge variation in disease severity at the time of surgery.The challenge now is to use and implement our findings for maximum patient benefit.

U2 - 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008018

DO - 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008018

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 47

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - Suppl. 3

ER -