Mode of Assessment and its Effect on Children’s Performance in Science

Donald S Gray, R. Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The research described here was an attempt to focus on and examine the phenomenon of differential performance on different modes of assessment noticed in the Assessment of Achievement Programme (Science), in Scotland. The research examined the performance of a sample of Primary 6 (10/11 years old) children on two modes of assessment. Comparable tasks were devised in both pencil and paper and more 'practical' formats and children's performance on these tasks analysed. The assessments and procedures used were refined and repeated in a second phase. Results suggest there is evidence that children, particularly lower achievers, perform better on more interactive, practically based tasks than on comparable tasks presented in a purely pencil and paper format. There is also evidence to suggest that there may be gender related differences in performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-68
Number of pages13
JournalEvaluation & Research in Education
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2001

Fingerprint

science
performance
evidence
gender

Cite this

Mode of Assessment and its Effect on Children’s Performance in Science. / Gray, Donald S; Sharp, R.

In: Evaluation & Research in Education, Vol. 15, No. 2, 10.2001, p. 55-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bde10daffc7f4e888631d2c0a3d3cc50,
title = "Mode of Assessment and its Effect on Children’s Performance in Science",
abstract = "The research described here was an attempt to focus on and examine the phenomenon of differential performance on different modes of assessment noticed in the Assessment of Achievement Programme (Science), in Scotland. The research examined the performance of a sample of Primary 6 (10/11 years old) children on two modes of assessment. Comparable tasks were devised in both pencil and paper and more 'practical' formats and children's performance on these tasks analysed. The assessments and procedures used were refined and repeated in a second phase. Results suggest there is evidence that children, particularly lower achievers, perform better on more interactive, practically based tasks than on comparable tasks presented in a purely pencil and paper format. There is also evidence to suggest that there may be gender related differences in performance.",
author = "Gray, {Donald S} and R. Sharp",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/09500790108666983",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "55--68",
journal = "Evaluation & Research in Education",
issn = "0950-0790",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mode of Assessment and its Effect on Children’s Performance in Science

AU - Gray, Donald S

AU - Sharp, R.

PY - 2001/10

Y1 - 2001/10

N2 - The research described here was an attempt to focus on and examine the phenomenon of differential performance on different modes of assessment noticed in the Assessment of Achievement Programme (Science), in Scotland. The research examined the performance of a sample of Primary 6 (10/11 years old) children on two modes of assessment. Comparable tasks were devised in both pencil and paper and more 'practical' formats and children's performance on these tasks analysed. The assessments and procedures used were refined and repeated in a second phase. Results suggest there is evidence that children, particularly lower achievers, perform better on more interactive, practically based tasks than on comparable tasks presented in a purely pencil and paper format. There is also evidence to suggest that there may be gender related differences in performance.

AB - The research described here was an attempt to focus on and examine the phenomenon of differential performance on different modes of assessment noticed in the Assessment of Achievement Programme (Science), in Scotland. The research examined the performance of a sample of Primary 6 (10/11 years old) children on two modes of assessment. Comparable tasks were devised in both pencil and paper and more 'practical' formats and children's performance on these tasks analysed. The assessments and procedures used were refined and repeated in a second phase. Results suggest there is evidence that children, particularly lower achievers, perform better on more interactive, practically based tasks than on comparable tasks presented in a purely pencil and paper format. There is also evidence to suggest that there may be gender related differences in performance.

U2 - 10.1080/09500790108666983

DO - 10.1080/09500790108666983

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 55

EP - 68

JO - Evaluation & Research in Education

JF - Evaluation & Research in Education

SN - 0950-0790

IS - 2

ER -