Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099)

J. M. Clark, M. F. Billett, M. Coyle, S. Croft, S. Daniels, C. D. Evans, M. Evans, C. Freeman, A. V. Gallego-Sala, A. Heinemeyer, J. I. House, D. T. Monteith, D. Nayak, H. G. Orr, I. C. Prentice, R. Rose, J. Rowson, J. U. Smith, P. Smith, Y. M. Tun & 3 others E. Vanguelova, F. Wetterhall, F. Worrall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We compared output from 3 dynamic process-based models (DMs: ECOSSE, MILLENNIA and the Durham Carbon Model) and 9 bioclimatic envelope models (BCEMs; including BBOG ensemble and PEATSTASH) ranging from simple threshold to semi-process-based models. Model simulations were run at 4 British peatland sites using historical climate data and climate projections under a medium (A1B) emissions scenario from the 11-RCM (regional climate model) ensemble underpinning UKCP09. The models showed that blanket peatlands are vulnerable to projected climate change; however, predictions varied between models as well as between sites. All BCEMs predicted a shift from presence to absence of a climate associated with blanket peat, where the sites with the lowest total annual precipitation were closest to the presence/absence threshold. DMs showed a more variable response. ECOSSE predicted a decline in net C sink and shift to net C source by the end of this century. The Durham Carbon Model predicted a smaller decline in the net C sink strength, but no shift to net C source. MILLENNIA predicted a slight overall increase in the net C sink. In contrast to the BCEM projections, the DMs predicted that the sites with coolest temperatures and greatest total annual precipitation showed the largest change in carbon sinks. In this model inter-comparison, the greatest variation in model output in response to climate change projections was not between the BCEMs and DMs but between the DMs themselves, because of different approaches to modelling soil organic matter pools and decomposition amongst other processes. The difference in the sign of the response has major implications for future climate feedbacks, climate policy and peatland management. Enhanced data collection, in particular monitoring peatland response to current change, would significantly improve model development and projections of future change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-248
Number of pages22
JournalClimate Research
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2010

Keywords

  • peatland
  • carbon
  • climate change
  • bioclimatic envelope model
  • dynamic model
  • uplands
  • ECOSSE
  • mILLENNIA
  • Durham carbon model
  • climate-change impacts
  • carbon-cycle
  • organic-carbon
  • runoff generation
  • upland peatlands
  • uncertainty
  • soils
  • UK
  • feedback
  • England

Cite this

Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099). / Clark, J. M.; Billett, M. F.; Coyle, M.; Croft, S.; Daniels, S.; Evans, C. D.; Evans, M.; Freeman, C.; Gallego-Sala, A. V.; Heinemeyer, A.; House, J. I.; Monteith, D. T.; Nayak, D.; Orr, H. G.; Prentice, I. C.; Rose, R.; Rowson, J.; Smith, J. U.; Smith, P.; Tun, Y. M.; Vanguelova, E.; Wetterhall, F.; Worrall, F.

In: Climate Research, Vol. 45, No. 1, 12.12.2010, p. 227-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clark, JM, Billett, MF, Coyle, M, Croft, S, Daniels, S, Evans, CD, Evans, M, Freeman, C, Gallego-Sala, AV, Heinemeyer, A, House, JI, Monteith, DT, Nayak, D, Orr, HG, Prentice, IC, Rose, R, Rowson, J, Smith, JU, Smith, P, Tun, YM, Vanguelova, E, Wetterhall, F & Worrall, F 2010, 'Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099)' Climate Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 227-248. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00974
Clark, J. M. ; Billett, M. F. ; Coyle, M. ; Croft, S. ; Daniels, S. ; Evans, C. D. ; Evans, M. ; Freeman, C. ; Gallego-Sala, A. V. ; Heinemeyer, A. ; House, J. I. ; Monteith, D. T. ; Nayak, D. ; Orr, H. G. ; Prentice, I. C. ; Rose, R. ; Rowson, J. ; Smith, J. U. ; Smith, P. ; Tun, Y. M. ; Vanguelova, E. ; Wetterhall, F. ; Worrall, F. / Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099). In: Climate Research. 2010 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 227-248.
@article{06aeb890674748a4838a2ece763a427a,
title = "Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099)",
abstract = "We compared output from 3 dynamic process-based models (DMs: ECOSSE, MILLENNIA and the Durham Carbon Model) and 9 bioclimatic envelope models (BCEMs; including BBOG ensemble and PEATSTASH) ranging from simple threshold to semi-process-based models. Model simulations were run at 4 British peatland sites using historical climate data and climate projections under a medium (A1B) emissions scenario from the 11-RCM (regional climate model) ensemble underpinning UKCP09. The models showed that blanket peatlands are vulnerable to projected climate change; however, predictions varied between models as well as between sites. All BCEMs predicted a shift from presence to absence of a climate associated with blanket peat, where the sites with the lowest total annual precipitation were closest to the presence/absence threshold. DMs showed a more variable response. ECOSSE predicted a decline in net C sink and shift to net C source by the end of this century. The Durham Carbon Model predicted a smaller decline in the net C sink strength, but no shift to net C source. MILLENNIA predicted a slight overall increase in the net C sink. In contrast to the BCEM projections, the DMs predicted that the sites with coolest temperatures and greatest total annual precipitation showed the largest change in carbon sinks. In this model inter-comparison, the greatest variation in model output in response to climate change projections was not between the BCEMs and DMs but between the DMs themselves, because of different approaches to modelling soil organic matter pools and decomposition amongst other processes. The difference in the sign of the response has major implications for future climate feedbacks, climate policy and peatland management. Enhanced data collection, in particular monitoring peatland response to current change, would significantly improve model development and projections of future change.",
keywords = "peatland, carbon, climate change, bioclimatic envelope model, dynamic model, uplands, ECOSSE, mILLENNIA, Durham carbon model, climate-change impacts, carbon-cycle, organic-carbon, runoff generation, upland peatlands, uncertainty, soils, UK, feedback, England",
author = "Clark, {J. M.} and Billett, {M. F.} and M. Coyle and S. Croft and S. Daniels and Evans, {C. D.} and M. Evans and C. Freeman and Gallego-Sala, {A. V.} and A. Heinemeyer and House, {J. I.} and Monteith, {D. T.} and D. Nayak and Orr, {H. G.} and Prentice, {I. C.} and R. Rose and J. Rowson and Smith, {J. U.} and P. Smith and Tun, {Y. M.} and E. Vanguelova and F. Wetterhall and F. Worrall",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3354/cr00974",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "227--248",
journal = "Climate Research",
issn = "0936-577X",
publisher = "Inter-Research",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099)

AU - Clark, J. M.

AU - Billett, M. F.

AU - Coyle, M.

AU - Croft, S.

AU - Daniels, S.

AU - Evans, C. D.

AU - Evans, M.

AU - Freeman, C.

AU - Gallego-Sala, A. V.

AU - Heinemeyer, A.

AU - House, J. I.

AU - Monteith, D. T.

AU - Nayak, D.

AU - Orr, H. G.

AU - Prentice, I. C.

AU - Rose, R.

AU - Rowson, J.

AU - Smith, J. U.

AU - Smith, P.

AU - Tun, Y. M.

AU - Vanguelova, E.

AU - Wetterhall, F.

AU - Worrall, F.

PY - 2010/12/12

Y1 - 2010/12/12

N2 - We compared output from 3 dynamic process-based models (DMs: ECOSSE, MILLENNIA and the Durham Carbon Model) and 9 bioclimatic envelope models (BCEMs; including BBOG ensemble and PEATSTASH) ranging from simple threshold to semi-process-based models. Model simulations were run at 4 British peatland sites using historical climate data and climate projections under a medium (A1B) emissions scenario from the 11-RCM (regional climate model) ensemble underpinning UKCP09. The models showed that blanket peatlands are vulnerable to projected climate change; however, predictions varied between models as well as between sites. All BCEMs predicted a shift from presence to absence of a climate associated with blanket peat, where the sites with the lowest total annual precipitation were closest to the presence/absence threshold. DMs showed a more variable response. ECOSSE predicted a decline in net C sink and shift to net C source by the end of this century. The Durham Carbon Model predicted a smaller decline in the net C sink strength, but no shift to net C source. MILLENNIA predicted a slight overall increase in the net C sink. In contrast to the BCEM projections, the DMs predicted that the sites with coolest temperatures and greatest total annual precipitation showed the largest change in carbon sinks. In this model inter-comparison, the greatest variation in model output in response to climate change projections was not between the BCEMs and DMs but between the DMs themselves, because of different approaches to modelling soil organic matter pools and decomposition amongst other processes. The difference in the sign of the response has major implications for future climate feedbacks, climate policy and peatland management. Enhanced data collection, in particular monitoring peatland response to current change, would significantly improve model development and projections of future change.

AB - We compared output from 3 dynamic process-based models (DMs: ECOSSE, MILLENNIA and the Durham Carbon Model) and 9 bioclimatic envelope models (BCEMs; including BBOG ensemble and PEATSTASH) ranging from simple threshold to semi-process-based models. Model simulations were run at 4 British peatland sites using historical climate data and climate projections under a medium (A1B) emissions scenario from the 11-RCM (regional climate model) ensemble underpinning UKCP09. The models showed that blanket peatlands are vulnerable to projected climate change; however, predictions varied between models as well as between sites. All BCEMs predicted a shift from presence to absence of a climate associated with blanket peat, where the sites with the lowest total annual precipitation were closest to the presence/absence threshold. DMs showed a more variable response. ECOSSE predicted a decline in net C sink and shift to net C source by the end of this century. The Durham Carbon Model predicted a smaller decline in the net C sink strength, but no shift to net C source. MILLENNIA predicted a slight overall increase in the net C sink. In contrast to the BCEM projections, the DMs predicted that the sites with coolest temperatures and greatest total annual precipitation showed the largest change in carbon sinks. In this model inter-comparison, the greatest variation in model output in response to climate change projections was not between the BCEMs and DMs but between the DMs themselves, because of different approaches to modelling soil organic matter pools and decomposition amongst other processes. The difference in the sign of the response has major implications for future climate feedbacks, climate policy and peatland management. Enhanced data collection, in particular monitoring peatland response to current change, would significantly improve model development and projections of future change.

KW - peatland

KW - carbon

KW - climate change

KW - bioclimatic envelope model

KW - dynamic model

KW - uplands

KW - ECOSSE

KW - mILLENNIA

KW - Durham carbon model

KW - climate-change impacts

KW - carbon-cycle

KW - organic-carbon

KW - runoff generation

KW - upland peatlands

KW - uncertainty

KW - soils

KW - UK

KW - feedback

KW - England

U2 - 10.3354/cr00974

DO - 10.3354/cr00974

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 227

EP - 248

JO - Climate Research

JF - Climate Research

SN - 0936-577X

IS - 1

ER -