Modelling dispersal: an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved

Justin M. J. Travis, Karen Mustin, Kamil A. Barton, Tim G. Benton, Jean Clobert, Maria M. Delgado, Calvin Dytham, Thomas Hovestadt, Stephen C. F. Palmer, Hans Van Dyck, Dries Bonte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Understanding the causes and consequences of dispersal remains a central topic in ecology and evolution. However, a mismatch exists between our empirical understanding of the complexity of dispersal and our representation of dispersal in models. While the empirical literature is replete with examples of condition dependence at the emigration, movement and settlement phases, models rarely incorporate realism or complexity to this degree. Nor do models often include the different costs associated with dispersal, which can themselves be linked to one or more of the three key phases. 2. Here, we propose that by explicitly accounting for emigration, movement and settlement (and the multiple costs associated with each) we can substantially improve our understanding of both the dispersal process itself and how dispersal traits trade off against other life-history characteristics. We explore some of these issues conceptually, before presenting illustrative results gained from a flexible individual-based model which incorporates considerable dispersal complexity. 3. These results emphasise the nonlinear interplay between the different dispersal stages. For example, we find that investment in movement ability (at a cost to fecundity) depends upon the propensity to emigrate (and vice versa). However, owing to selection acting at the metapopulation level as well as at the individual level, the relationship between the two is not straightforward. Importantly, the shape of the trade-off between movement ability and reproductive potential can strongly influence the joint evolution of dispersal parameters controlling the degree of investment in safer movement, the probability of emigration and the straightness of movement. 4. Our results highlight that the joint evolution of dispersal characteristics can have major implications for spatial population dynamics and we argue that, in addition to increasing our fundamental biological understanding, a new generation of dispersal modelling, which exploits recent empirical advances, can substantially improve our ability to predict and manage the response of species to environmental change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)628-641
Number of pages14
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume3
Issue number4
Early online date24 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Keywords

  • evolutionary biology
  • life-history
  • migration
  • modelling
  • population ecology
  • trade off
  • transition

Cite this

Modelling dispersal : an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved. / Travis, Justin M. J.; Mustin, Karen; Barton, Kamil A.; Benton, Tim G.; Clobert, Jean; Delgado, Maria M.; Dytham, Calvin; Hovestadt, Thomas; Palmer, Stephen C. F.; Van Dyck, Hans; Bonte, Dries.

In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 3, No. 4, 08.2012, p. 628-641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Travis, Justin M. J. ; Mustin, Karen ; Barton, Kamil A. ; Benton, Tim G. ; Clobert, Jean ; Delgado, Maria M. ; Dytham, Calvin ; Hovestadt, Thomas ; Palmer, Stephen C. F. ; Van Dyck, Hans ; Bonte, Dries. / Modelling dispersal : an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved. In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2012 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 628-641.
@article{29d9469d7c804291823a2a62098b5015,
title = "Modelling dispersal: an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved",
abstract = "1. Understanding the causes and consequences of dispersal remains a central topic in ecology and evolution. However, a mismatch exists between our empirical understanding of the complexity of dispersal and our representation of dispersal in models. While the empirical literature is replete with examples of condition dependence at the emigration, movement and settlement phases, models rarely incorporate realism or complexity to this degree. Nor do models often include the different costs associated with dispersal, which can themselves be linked to one or more of the three key phases. 2. Here, we propose that by explicitly accounting for emigration, movement and settlement (and the multiple costs associated with each) we can substantially improve our understanding of both the dispersal process itself and how dispersal traits trade off against other life-history characteristics. We explore some of these issues conceptually, before presenting illustrative results gained from a flexible individual-based model which incorporates considerable dispersal complexity. 3. These results emphasise the nonlinear interplay between the different dispersal stages. For example, we find that investment in movement ability (at a cost to fecundity) depends upon the propensity to emigrate (and vice versa). However, owing to selection acting at the metapopulation level as well as at the individual level, the relationship between the two is not straightforward. Importantly, the shape of the trade-off between movement ability and reproductive potential can strongly influence the joint evolution of dispersal parameters controlling the degree of investment in safer movement, the probability of emigration and the straightness of movement. 4. Our results highlight that the joint evolution of dispersal characteristics can have major implications for spatial population dynamics and we argue that, in addition to increasing our fundamental biological understanding, a new generation of dispersal modelling, which exploits recent empirical advances, can substantially improve our ability to predict and manage the response of species to environmental change.",
keywords = "evolutionary biology, life-history, migration, modelling, population ecology, trade off , transition",
author = "Travis, {Justin M. J.} and Karen Mustin and Barton, {Kamil A.} and Benton, {Tim G.} and Jean Clobert and Delgado, {Maria M.} and Calvin Dytham and Thomas Hovestadt and Palmer, {Stephen C. F.} and {Van Dyck}, Hans and Dries Bonte",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00193.x",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "628--641",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "WILEY-BLACKWELL",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling dispersal

T2 - an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved

AU - Travis, Justin M. J.

AU - Mustin, Karen

AU - Barton, Kamil A.

AU - Benton, Tim G.

AU - Clobert, Jean

AU - Delgado, Maria M.

AU - Dytham, Calvin

AU - Hovestadt, Thomas

AU - Palmer, Stephen C. F.

AU - Van Dyck, Hans

AU - Bonte, Dries

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - 1. Understanding the causes and consequences of dispersal remains a central topic in ecology and evolution. However, a mismatch exists between our empirical understanding of the complexity of dispersal and our representation of dispersal in models. While the empirical literature is replete with examples of condition dependence at the emigration, movement and settlement phases, models rarely incorporate realism or complexity to this degree. Nor do models often include the different costs associated with dispersal, which can themselves be linked to one or more of the three key phases. 2. Here, we propose that by explicitly accounting for emigration, movement and settlement (and the multiple costs associated with each) we can substantially improve our understanding of both the dispersal process itself and how dispersal traits trade off against other life-history characteristics. We explore some of these issues conceptually, before presenting illustrative results gained from a flexible individual-based model which incorporates considerable dispersal complexity. 3. These results emphasise the nonlinear interplay between the different dispersal stages. For example, we find that investment in movement ability (at a cost to fecundity) depends upon the propensity to emigrate (and vice versa). However, owing to selection acting at the metapopulation level as well as at the individual level, the relationship between the two is not straightforward. Importantly, the shape of the trade-off between movement ability and reproductive potential can strongly influence the joint evolution of dispersal parameters controlling the degree of investment in safer movement, the probability of emigration and the straightness of movement. 4. Our results highlight that the joint evolution of dispersal characteristics can have major implications for spatial population dynamics and we argue that, in addition to increasing our fundamental biological understanding, a new generation of dispersal modelling, which exploits recent empirical advances, can substantially improve our ability to predict and manage the response of species to environmental change.

AB - 1. Understanding the causes and consequences of dispersal remains a central topic in ecology and evolution. However, a mismatch exists between our empirical understanding of the complexity of dispersal and our representation of dispersal in models. While the empirical literature is replete with examples of condition dependence at the emigration, movement and settlement phases, models rarely incorporate realism or complexity to this degree. Nor do models often include the different costs associated with dispersal, which can themselves be linked to one or more of the three key phases. 2. Here, we propose that by explicitly accounting for emigration, movement and settlement (and the multiple costs associated with each) we can substantially improve our understanding of both the dispersal process itself and how dispersal traits trade off against other life-history characteristics. We explore some of these issues conceptually, before presenting illustrative results gained from a flexible individual-based model which incorporates considerable dispersal complexity. 3. These results emphasise the nonlinear interplay between the different dispersal stages. For example, we find that investment in movement ability (at a cost to fecundity) depends upon the propensity to emigrate (and vice versa). However, owing to selection acting at the metapopulation level as well as at the individual level, the relationship between the two is not straightforward. Importantly, the shape of the trade-off between movement ability and reproductive potential can strongly influence the joint evolution of dispersal parameters controlling the degree of investment in safer movement, the probability of emigration and the straightness of movement. 4. Our results highlight that the joint evolution of dispersal characteristics can have major implications for spatial population dynamics and we argue that, in addition to increasing our fundamental biological understanding, a new generation of dispersal modelling, which exploits recent empirical advances, can substantially improve our ability to predict and manage the response of species to environmental change.

KW - evolutionary biology

KW - life-history

KW - migration

KW - modelling

KW - population ecology

KW - trade off

KW - transition

U2 - 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00193.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00193.x

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 628

EP - 641

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 4

ER -