Models of Party Democracy

Patterns of Party Regulation in Post-War European Constitutions

Ingrid van Biezen, Gabriela Alina Borz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article investigates the ways in which political parties are codified in modern democratic constitutions, providing a unique cross-sectional and longitudinal overview of the patterns of party constitutionalization in post-war Europe. Although the constitutions of western liberal democracies traditionally have paid little attention to the role of parties, evidence suggests that in contemporary democracies, both old and new, they are increasingly accorded a formal constitutional status. Little is known, however, about the substantive content of their constitutional position or about the normative connotations of their constitutional codification. In this article, we demonstrate that there is a clear correlation between the nature and the intensity of party constitutionalization and the newness and historical experience of democracy and that, with time, the constitutional regulation of the extra-parliamentary organization and the parties’ rights and duties has gained in importance at the expense of their parliamentary and electoral roles. The analysis furthermore suggests that three distinct models of party constitutionalization can be identified – Defending Democracy, Parties in Public Office, and Parties as Public Utilities – each of which is related to a particular conception of party democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-359
Number of pages33
JournalEuropean Political Science Review
Volume4
Issue number3
Early online date1 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

European Constitution
democracy
regulation
constitution
public office
public utilities
organization
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • political parties
  • constitutionalization
  • regulation
  • conceptions of demoracy

Cite this

Models of Party Democracy : Patterns of Party Regulation in Post-War European Constitutions. / van Biezen, Ingrid; Borz, Gabriela Alina.

In: European Political Science Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, 11.2012, p. 327-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van Biezen, Ingrid ; Borz, Gabriela Alina. / Models of Party Democracy : Patterns of Party Regulation in Post-War European Constitutions. In: European Political Science Review. 2012 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 327-359.
@article{474df5d8d79b4d7a984b2e32e3bf1f31,
title = "Models of Party Democracy: Patterns of Party Regulation in Post-War European Constitutions",
abstract = "This article investigates the ways in which political parties are codified in modern democratic constitutions, providing a unique cross-sectional and longitudinal overview of the patterns of party constitutionalization in post-war Europe. Although the constitutions of western liberal democracies traditionally have paid little attention to the role of parties, evidence suggests that in contemporary democracies, both old and new, they are increasingly accorded a formal constitutional status. Little is known, however, about the substantive content of their constitutional position or about the normative connotations of their constitutional codification. In this article, we demonstrate that there is a clear correlation between the nature and the intensity of party constitutionalization and the newness and historical experience of democracy and that, with time, the constitutional regulation of the extra-parliamentary organization and the parties’ rights and duties has gained in importance at the expense of their parliamentary and electoral roles. The analysis furthermore suggests that three distinct models of party constitutionalization can be identified – Defending Democracy, Parties in Public Office, and Parties as Public Utilities – each of which is related to a particular conception of party democracy.",
keywords = "political parties, constitutionalization, regulation, conceptions of demoracy",
author = "{van Biezen}, Ingrid and Borz, {Gabriela Alina}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1017/S1755773911000294",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "327--359",
journal = "European Political Science Review",
issn = "1755-7739",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Models of Party Democracy

T2 - Patterns of Party Regulation in Post-War European Constitutions

AU - van Biezen, Ingrid

AU - Borz, Gabriela Alina

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - This article investigates the ways in which political parties are codified in modern democratic constitutions, providing a unique cross-sectional and longitudinal overview of the patterns of party constitutionalization in post-war Europe. Although the constitutions of western liberal democracies traditionally have paid little attention to the role of parties, evidence suggests that in contemporary democracies, both old and new, they are increasingly accorded a formal constitutional status. Little is known, however, about the substantive content of their constitutional position or about the normative connotations of their constitutional codification. In this article, we demonstrate that there is a clear correlation between the nature and the intensity of party constitutionalization and the newness and historical experience of democracy and that, with time, the constitutional regulation of the extra-parliamentary organization and the parties’ rights and duties has gained in importance at the expense of their parliamentary and electoral roles. The analysis furthermore suggests that three distinct models of party constitutionalization can be identified – Defending Democracy, Parties in Public Office, and Parties as Public Utilities – each of which is related to a particular conception of party democracy.

AB - This article investigates the ways in which political parties are codified in modern democratic constitutions, providing a unique cross-sectional and longitudinal overview of the patterns of party constitutionalization in post-war Europe. Although the constitutions of western liberal democracies traditionally have paid little attention to the role of parties, evidence suggests that in contemporary democracies, both old and new, they are increasingly accorded a formal constitutional status. Little is known, however, about the substantive content of their constitutional position or about the normative connotations of their constitutional codification. In this article, we demonstrate that there is a clear correlation between the nature and the intensity of party constitutionalization and the newness and historical experience of democracy and that, with time, the constitutional regulation of the extra-parliamentary organization and the parties’ rights and duties has gained in importance at the expense of their parliamentary and electoral roles. The analysis furthermore suggests that three distinct models of party constitutionalization can be identified – Defending Democracy, Parties in Public Office, and Parties as Public Utilities – each of which is related to a particular conception of party democracy.

KW - political parties

KW - constitutionalization

KW - regulation

KW - conceptions of demoracy

U2 - 10.1017/S1755773911000294

DO - 10.1017/S1755773911000294

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 327

EP - 359

JO - European Political Science Review

JF - European Political Science Review

SN - 1755-7739

IS - 3

ER -