Mood in chronic disease

Questioning the answers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main research questions concerning mood and chronic disease are about the
extent, sources, and consequences of emotional distress. Answers to these questions are informative both to psychological theory and to the design of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients. However, as a result of practical and ethical limitations in research designs, the answers obtained are rarely definitive and typically need to be interpreted carefully. This article illustrates some of the problems using studies of patients with cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other disabling conditions. The first group of studies illustrates problems in the timing of mood measurement including both timing within an interview, and issues concerned with identifying equivalent timing in the stages of disease and its treatment. The remaining studies are used to illustrate the limits of non-experimental longitudinal, and of experimental designs. It is concluded that research in this area requires the use of more than one research paradigm to achieve dependable answers
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-87
Number of pages17
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Chronic Disease
Research Design
Research
Psychological Theory
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Interviews
Neoplasms
Therapeutics

Cite this

Mood in chronic disease : Questioning the answers. / Johnston, Marie.

In: Current Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1999, p. 71-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83774913922443e3aac030da10c47525,
title = "Mood in chronic disease: Questioning the answers",
abstract = "The main research questions concerning mood and chronic disease are about the extent, sources, and consequences of emotional distress. Answers to these questions are informative both to psychological theory and to the design of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients. However, as a result of practical and ethical limitations in research designs, the answers obtained are rarely definitive and typically need to be interpreted carefully. This article illustrates some of the problems using studies of patients with cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other disabling conditions. The first group of studies illustrates problems in the timing of mood measurement including both timing within an interview, and issues concerned with identifying equivalent timing in the stages of disease and its treatment. The remaining studies are used to illustrate the limits of non-experimental longitudinal, and of experimental designs. It is concluded that research in this area requires the use of more than one research paradigm to achieve dependable answers",
author = "Marie Johnston",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1007/s12144-999-1017-z",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "71--87",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "0737-8262",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mood in chronic disease

T2 - Questioning the answers

AU - Johnston, Marie

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - The main research questions concerning mood and chronic disease are about the extent, sources, and consequences of emotional distress. Answers to these questions are informative both to psychological theory and to the design of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients. However, as a result of practical and ethical limitations in research designs, the answers obtained are rarely definitive and typically need to be interpreted carefully. This article illustrates some of the problems using studies of patients with cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other disabling conditions. The first group of studies illustrates problems in the timing of mood measurement including both timing within an interview, and issues concerned with identifying equivalent timing in the stages of disease and its treatment. The remaining studies are used to illustrate the limits of non-experimental longitudinal, and of experimental designs. It is concluded that research in this area requires the use of more than one research paradigm to achieve dependable answers

AB - The main research questions concerning mood and chronic disease are about the extent, sources, and consequences of emotional distress. Answers to these questions are informative both to psychological theory and to the design of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients. However, as a result of practical and ethical limitations in research designs, the answers obtained are rarely definitive and typically need to be interpreted carefully. This article illustrates some of the problems using studies of patients with cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other disabling conditions. The first group of studies illustrates problems in the timing of mood measurement including both timing within an interview, and issues concerned with identifying equivalent timing in the stages of disease and its treatment. The remaining studies are used to illustrate the limits of non-experimental longitudinal, and of experimental designs. It is concluded that research in this area requires the use of more than one research paradigm to achieve dependable answers

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-999-1017-z

DO - 10.1007/s12144-999-1017-z

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 71

EP - 87

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 0737-8262

IS - 1

ER -