Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences

an experimental study

Juergen Bracht, Adam Zylbersztejn (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We study questionnaire responses to situations in which sacrificing one life may save many other lives. We demonstrate gender differences in moral judgments: males are more supportive of the sacrifice than females. We investigate a source of the endorsement of the sacrifice: antisocial preferences. First, we measure individual proneness to spiteful behavior, using an experimental game with monetary stakes. We demonstrate that spitefulness can be sizable—a fifth of our participants behave spitefully—but it is not associated with gender. Second, we find that gender is consistently associated with responses even when we account for individual differences in the propensity to spitefulness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-406
Number of pages18
JournalTheory and Decision
Volume85
Issue number3-4
Early online date25 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint

moral judgement
Experimental Games
gender
gender-specific factors
Individuality
questionnaire
Moral judgment
Experimental study
Moral Judgment
Experimental Study
Questionnaire
Gender differences
Endorsements
Experimental games
Propensity
Individual differences
Gender Differences
Individual Differences
Stakes

Keywords

  • Moral dilemma
  • Moral judgments
  • Experiment
  • Gender
  • Antisocial preferences
  • Individual differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences : an experimental study. / Bracht, Juergen; Zylbersztejn, Adam (Corresponding Author).

In: Theory and Decision, Vol. 85, No. 3-4, 10.2018, p. 389-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{059be69d01ea47afb2e4e67d6d3c1f49,
title = "Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences: an experimental study",
abstract = "We study questionnaire responses to situations in which sacrificing one life may save many other lives. We demonstrate gender differences in moral judgments: males are more supportive of the sacrifice than females. We investigate a source of the endorsement of the sacrifice: antisocial preferences. First, we measure individual proneness to spiteful behavior, using an experimental game with monetary stakes. We demonstrate that spitefulness can be sizable—a fifth of our participants behave spitefully—but it is not associated with gender. Second, we find that gender is consistently associated with responses even when we account for individual differences in the propensity to spitefulness.",
keywords = "Moral dilemma, Moral judgments, Experiment, Gender, Antisocial preferences , Individual differences",
author = "Juergen Bracht and Adam Zylbersztejn",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11238-018-9668-6",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "389--406",
journal = "Theory and Decision",
issn = "1573-7187",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences

T2 - an experimental study

AU - Bracht, Juergen

AU - Zylbersztejn, Adam

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - We study questionnaire responses to situations in which sacrificing one life may save many other lives. We demonstrate gender differences in moral judgments: males are more supportive of the sacrifice than females. We investigate a source of the endorsement of the sacrifice: antisocial preferences. First, we measure individual proneness to spiteful behavior, using an experimental game with monetary stakes. We demonstrate that spitefulness can be sizable—a fifth of our participants behave spitefully—but it is not associated with gender. Second, we find that gender is consistently associated with responses even when we account for individual differences in the propensity to spitefulness.

AB - We study questionnaire responses to situations in which sacrificing one life may save many other lives. We demonstrate gender differences in moral judgments: males are more supportive of the sacrifice than females. We investigate a source of the endorsement of the sacrifice: antisocial preferences. First, we measure individual proneness to spiteful behavior, using an experimental game with monetary stakes. We demonstrate that spitefulness can be sizable—a fifth of our participants behave spitefully—but it is not associated with gender. Second, we find that gender is consistently associated with responses even when we account for individual differences in the propensity to spitefulness.

KW - Moral dilemma

KW - Moral judgments

KW - Experiment

KW - Gender

KW - Antisocial preferences

KW - Individual differences

U2 - 10.1007/s11238-018-9668-6

DO - 10.1007/s11238-018-9668-6

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 389

EP - 406

JO - Theory and Decision

JF - Theory and Decision

SN - 1573-7187

IS - 3-4

ER -