Moral progress without moral realism

Catherine Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We can acknowledge the existence of moral truths and moral progress without being committed to moral realism. Rather than defending this claim through the more familiar route of the attempted analysis of the ontological commitments of moral claims, I show how moral belief change for the better shares certain features with theoretical progress in the natural sciences. There is no ‘decision-procedure’ for ethics any more than there is for molecular biology. Yet, the betterness of true theories can be grasped through what I term ‘undirectional narratives’ of progress. And while there are true moral claims and perhaps numerous moral truths yet to be discovered, we should reject currently popular forms of moral realism with bivalence. Some moral claims lend themselves to the construction of fully reversible, bi-directional narratives and are likely neither true nor false.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-116
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophical Papers
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Moral Realism
Molecular Biology
Decision Procedures
Ontological Commitment
Route
Bivalence
Natural Science
Belief Change

Cite this

Moral progress without moral realism. / Wilson, Catherine.

In: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, p. 97-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilson, Catherine. / Moral progress without moral realism. In: Philosophical Papers. 2010 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 97-116.
@article{db1f92e94b144ddca64f32bf919d8036,
title = "Moral progress without moral realism",
abstract = "We can acknowledge the existence of moral truths and moral progress without being committed to moral realism. Rather than defending this claim through the more familiar route of the attempted analysis of the ontological commitments of moral claims, I show how moral belief change for the better shares certain features with theoretical progress in the natural sciences. There is no ‘decision-procedure’ for ethics any more than there is for molecular biology. Yet, the betterness of true theories can be grasped through what I term ‘undirectional narratives’ of progress. And while there are true moral claims and perhaps numerous moral truths yet to be discovered, we should reject currently popular forms of moral realism with bivalence. Some moral claims lend themselves to the construction of fully reversible, bi-directional narratives and are likely neither true nor false.",
author = "Catherine Wilson",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/05568641003669508",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "97--116",
journal = "Philosophical Papers",
issn = "0556-8641",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral progress without moral realism

AU - Wilson, Catherine

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - We can acknowledge the existence of moral truths and moral progress without being committed to moral realism. Rather than defending this claim through the more familiar route of the attempted analysis of the ontological commitments of moral claims, I show how moral belief change for the better shares certain features with theoretical progress in the natural sciences. There is no ‘decision-procedure’ for ethics any more than there is for molecular biology. Yet, the betterness of true theories can be grasped through what I term ‘undirectional narratives’ of progress. And while there are true moral claims and perhaps numerous moral truths yet to be discovered, we should reject currently popular forms of moral realism with bivalence. Some moral claims lend themselves to the construction of fully reversible, bi-directional narratives and are likely neither true nor false.

AB - We can acknowledge the existence of moral truths and moral progress without being committed to moral realism. Rather than defending this claim through the more familiar route of the attempted analysis of the ontological commitments of moral claims, I show how moral belief change for the better shares certain features with theoretical progress in the natural sciences. There is no ‘decision-procedure’ for ethics any more than there is for molecular biology. Yet, the betterness of true theories can be grasped through what I term ‘undirectional narratives’ of progress. And while there are true moral claims and perhaps numerous moral truths yet to be discovered, we should reject currently popular forms of moral realism with bivalence. Some moral claims lend themselves to the construction of fully reversible, bi-directional narratives and are likely neither true nor false.

U2 - 10.1080/05568641003669508

DO - 10.1080/05568641003669508

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 97

EP - 116

JO - Philosophical Papers

JF - Philosophical Papers

SN - 0556-8641

IS - 1

ER -