Multidisciplininary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals

M. S. Roberts, Michelle Annette King

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    49 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aim of study: This study sought to determine whether multidisciplinary case conference reviews improved outcomes for nursing home residents, and the effects of this team approach to resident care on carers, including the hands-on carers employed by the nursing home, and health professionals.

    Method: 245 residents of three Canberra nursing homes were enrolled in this non-randomised controlled trial. The intervention consisted of sessions of three case conference reviews held between 10/4/96 and 4/12/96. These sessions were attended by the General Practitioners (GPs) of the residents discussed, the GP project officer from the ACT Division of General Practice, a clinical pharmacist, senior nursing staff, other health professionals eg physiotherapist, and occasionally the resident concerned or their representative. At each review, a case presentation by the resident's GP was followed by a multidisciplinary discussion of all aspects, medical and non-medical, of the resident's care. The review concluded with a management plan for the resident. In total 75 residents were reviewed.

    Main outcome measures: Medication use and cost, and mortality.

    Results: One month after the reviews were completed comparisons between those who were reviewed and those who were not showed non-significant reductions in medication orders, medication cost, and mortality in the reviewed group. Many of the 92 recommendations in the management plans that were carried out benefited the residents (n=37) and/or carers (n=24). The responses of the GPs and the Directors of Nursing to the reviews were overwhelmingly positive.

    Conclusion: Recommendations arising from multidisciplinary case conferences were carried out to the benefit of patients and carers. Given the support shown by key stakeholders, multidisciplinary conferences should be used more.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-45
    Number of pages4
    JournalPharmacy World and Science
    Volume23
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • aged
    • case conference
    • frail elderly
    • long-term care
    • medication review
    • nursing homes
    • patient outcome
    • peer review, health care
    • pharmaceutical services
    • physicians, family
    • CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION

    Cite this

    Multidisciplininary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals. / Roberts, M. S.; King, Michelle Annette.

    In: Pharmacy World and Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2001, p. 41-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{6ae4a31b67444d679469c7e17b1a2354,
    title = "Multidisciplininary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals",
    abstract = "Aim of study: This study sought to determine whether multidisciplinary case conference reviews improved outcomes for nursing home residents, and the effects of this team approach to resident care on carers, including the hands-on carers employed by the nursing home, and health professionals.Method: 245 residents of three Canberra nursing homes were enrolled in this non-randomised controlled trial. The intervention consisted of sessions of three case conference reviews held between 10/4/96 and 4/12/96. These sessions were attended by the General Practitioners (GPs) of the residents discussed, the GP project officer from the ACT Division of General Practice, a clinical pharmacist, senior nursing staff, other health professionals eg physiotherapist, and occasionally the resident concerned or their representative. At each review, a case presentation by the resident's GP was followed by a multidisciplinary discussion of all aspects, medical and non-medical, of the resident's care. The review concluded with a management plan for the resident. In total 75 residents were reviewed.Main outcome measures: Medication use and cost, and mortality.Results: One month after the reviews were completed comparisons between those who were reviewed and those who were not showed non-significant reductions in medication orders, medication cost, and mortality in the reviewed group. Many of the 92 recommendations in the management plans that were carried out benefited the residents (n=37) and/or carers (n=24). The responses of the GPs and the Directors of Nursing to the reviews were overwhelmingly positive.Conclusion: Recommendations arising from multidisciplinary case conferences were carried out to the benefit of patients and carers. Given the support shown by key stakeholders, multidisciplinary conferences should be used more.",
    keywords = "aged, case conference, frail elderly, long-term care, medication review, nursing homes, patient outcome, peer review, health care, pharmaceutical services, physicians, family, CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION",
    author = "Roberts, {M. S.} and King, {Michelle Annette}",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1023/A:1011215008000",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "41--45",
    journal = "Pharmacy World and Science",
    issn = "0928-1231",
    publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Multidisciplininary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals

    AU - Roberts, M. S.

    AU - King, Michelle Annette

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - Aim of study: This study sought to determine whether multidisciplinary case conference reviews improved outcomes for nursing home residents, and the effects of this team approach to resident care on carers, including the hands-on carers employed by the nursing home, and health professionals.Method: 245 residents of three Canberra nursing homes were enrolled in this non-randomised controlled trial. The intervention consisted of sessions of three case conference reviews held between 10/4/96 and 4/12/96. These sessions were attended by the General Practitioners (GPs) of the residents discussed, the GP project officer from the ACT Division of General Practice, a clinical pharmacist, senior nursing staff, other health professionals eg physiotherapist, and occasionally the resident concerned or their representative. At each review, a case presentation by the resident's GP was followed by a multidisciplinary discussion of all aspects, medical and non-medical, of the resident's care. The review concluded with a management plan for the resident. In total 75 residents were reviewed.Main outcome measures: Medication use and cost, and mortality.Results: One month after the reviews were completed comparisons between those who were reviewed and those who were not showed non-significant reductions in medication orders, medication cost, and mortality in the reviewed group. Many of the 92 recommendations in the management plans that were carried out benefited the residents (n=37) and/or carers (n=24). The responses of the GPs and the Directors of Nursing to the reviews were overwhelmingly positive.Conclusion: Recommendations arising from multidisciplinary case conferences were carried out to the benefit of patients and carers. Given the support shown by key stakeholders, multidisciplinary conferences should be used more.

    AB - Aim of study: This study sought to determine whether multidisciplinary case conference reviews improved outcomes for nursing home residents, and the effects of this team approach to resident care on carers, including the hands-on carers employed by the nursing home, and health professionals.Method: 245 residents of three Canberra nursing homes were enrolled in this non-randomised controlled trial. The intervention consisted of sessions of three case conference reviews held between 10/4/96 and 4/12/96. These sessions were attended by the General Practitioners (GPs) of the residents discussed, the GP project officer from the ACT Division of General Practice, a clinical pharmacist, senior nursing staff, other health professionals eg physiotherapist, and occasionally the resident concerned or their representative. At each review, a case presentation by the resident's GP was followed by a multidisciplinary discussion of all aspects, medical and non-medical, of the resident's care. The review concluded with a management plan for the resident. In total 75 residents were reviewed.Main outcome measures: Medication use and cost, and mortality.Results: One month after the reviews were completed comparisons between those who were reviewed and those who were not showed non-significant reductions in medication orders, medication cost, and mortality in the reviewed group. Many of the 92 recommendations in the management plans that were carried out benefited the residents (n=37) and/or carers (n=24). The responses of the GPs and the Directors of Nursing to the reviews were overwhelmingly positive.Conclusion: Recommendations arising from multidisciplinary case conferences were carried out to the benefit of patients and carers. Given the support shown by key stakeholders, multidisciplinary conferences should be used more.

    KW - aged

    KW - case conference

    KW - frail elderly

    KW - long-term care

    KW - medication review

    KW - nursing homes

    KW - patient outcome

    KW - peer review, health care

    KW - pharmaceutical services

    KW - physicians, family

    KW - CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION

    U2 - 10.1023/A:1011215008000

    DO - 10.1023/A:1011215008000

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 41

    EP - 45

    JO - Pharmacy World and Science

    JF - Pharmacy World and Science

    SN - 0928-1231

    IS - 2

    ER -