Abstract
Philosophical applications of familiar paracomplete and paraconsistent logics often rely on an idea of ‘default classicality’. With respect to the paraconsistent logic LP (the dual of Strong Kleene or K3), such ‘default classicality’ is standardly cashed out via an LP-based nonmonotonic logic due to Priest (1991, 2006a). In this paper, I offer an alternative approach via a monotonic multiple-conclusion version of LP.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 326-336 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Review of Symbolic Logic |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2011 |