Multiple religious belonging

Conceptual advance or secularization denial?

Steve Bruce*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper critically examines the notion of ‘multiple religious belonging’ (MRB). Through an analysis of a recent study by Joantine Berghuijs, it argues that MRB is ill-defined and exaggerates the extent of popular religiosity. If MRB is at all common, then the de-legitimating effect of religious pluralism (which is well-supported by the evidence) is challenged. This paper suggests that such a challenge is unwarranted by Berghuijs’s evidence and concludes with an elaboration of the various and very different things that might be encompassed by MRB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-612
Number of pages10
JournalOpen Theology
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Secularization
Denial
Religion
Popular Religiosity
Religious Pluralism
Elaboration

Keywords

  • Consumerist religion
  • Multiple religious belonging
  • Secularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies

Cite this

Multiple religious belonging : Conceptual advance or secularization denial? / Bruce, Steve.

In: Open Theology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 26.10.2017, p. 603-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f516f2435cb04e828e8a7058af5296b7,
title = "Multiple religious belonging: Conceptual advance or secularization denial?",
abstract = "This paper critically examines the notion of ‘multiple religious belonging’ (MRB). Through an analysis of a recent study by Joantine Berghuijs, it argues that MRB is ill-defined and exaggerates the extent of popular religiosity. If MRB is at all common, then the de-legitimating effect of religious pluralism (which is well-supported by the evidence) is challenged. This paper suggests that such a challenge is unwarranted by Berghuijs’s evidence and concludes with an elaboration of the various and very different things that might be encompassed by MRB.",
keywords = "Consumerist religion, Multiple religious belonging, Secularization",
author = "Steve Bruce",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/opth-2017-0047",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "603--612",
journal = "Open Theology",
issn = "2300-6579",
publisher = "De Gruyter Open Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple religious belonging

T2 - Conceptual advance or secularization denial?

AU - Bruce, Steve

PY - 2017/10/26

Y1 - 2017/10/26

N2 - This paper critically examines the notion of ‘multiple religious belonging’ (MRB). Through an analysis of a recent study by Joantine Berghuijs, it argues that MRB is ill-defined and exaggerates the extent of popular religiosity. If MRB is at all common, then the de-legitimating effect of religious pluralism (which is well-supported by the evidence) is challenged. This paper suggests that such a challenge is unwarranted by Berghuijs’s evidence and concludes with an elaboration of the various and very different things that might be encompassed by MRB.

AB - This paper critically examines the notion of ‘multiple religious belonging’ (MRB). Through an analysis of a recent study by Joantine Berghuijs, it argues that MRB is ill-defined and exaggerates the extent of popular religiosity. If MRB is at all common, then the de-legitimating effect of religious pluralism (which is well-supported by the evidence) is challenged. This paper suggests that such a challenge is unwarranted by Berghuijs’s evidence and concludes with an elaboration of the various and very different things that might be encompassed by MRB.

KW - Consumerist religion

KW - Multiple religious belonging

KW - Secularization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043313074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/opth-2017-0047

DO - 10.1515/opth-2017-0047

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 603

EP - 612

JO - Open Theology

JF - Open Theology

SN - 2300-6579

IS - 1

ER -