Murdochian Humility

Tony Milligan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The following paper sets out a view of humility that is derived from Iris
Murdoch but which differs from a strict Murdochian approach in two important
respects. Firstly, any association with self-abnegation is removed; and secondly,
the value of a limited form of pride (recognition pride) is affirmed. The paper is
nevertheless strongly continuous with her work, in the sense that it builds upon her rejection of universalizability on the specifc grounds that we have varying moral competences. A liberal commitment to equality should not be allowed to spill out of the political domain. We are not all equal when it comes to the demands of morality. Humility is treated as a just discernment of our own limited moral competences. As such, it is a recognition of our particularity and not a form of radical self-effacement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-228
Number of pages12
JournalReligious Studies
Volume43
Issue number2
Early online date16 Apr 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Pride
Humility
Rejection
Morality
Discernment
Universalizability
Particularity
Equality

Cite this

Murdochian Humility. / Milligan, Tony.

In: Religious Studies, Vol. 43, No. 2, 06.2007, p. 217-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Milligan, T 2007, 'Murdochian Humility', Religious Studies, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412506008808
Milligan, Tony. / Murdochian Humility. In: Religious Studies. 2007 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 217-228.
@article{bc838b1ab9fc45c08fddb12c4cfb36d9,
title = "Murdochian Humility",
abstract = "The following paper sets out a view of humility that is derived from IrisMurdoch but which differs from a strict Murdochian approach in two importantrespects. Firstly, any association with self-abnegation is removed; and secondly,the value of a limited form of pride (recognition pride) is affirmed. The paper isnevertheless strongly continuous with her work, in the sense that it builds upon her rejection of universalizability on the specifc grounds that we have varying moral competences. A liberal commitment to equality should not be allowed to spill out of the political domain. We are not all equal when it comes to the demands of morality. Humility is treated as a just discernment of our own limited moral competences. As such, it is a recognition of our particularity and not a form of radical self-effacement.",
author = "Tony Milligan",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S0034412506008808",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "217--228",
journal = "Religious Studies",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Murdochian Humility

AU - Milligan, Tony

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - The following paper sets out a view of humility that is derived from IrisMurdoch but which differs from a strict Murdochian approach in two importantrespects. Firstly, any association with self-abnegation is removed; and secondly,the value of a limited form of pride (recognition pride) is affirmed. The paper isnevertheless strongly continuous with her work, in the sense that it builds upon her rejection of universalizability on the specifc grounds that we have varying moral competences. A liberal commitment to equality should not be allowed to spill out of the political domain. We are not all equal when it comes to the demands of morality. Humility is treated as a just discernment of our own limited moral competences. As such, it is a recognition of our particularity and not a form of radical self-effacement.

AB - The following paper sets out a view of humility that is derived from IrisMurdoch but which differs from a strict Murdochian approach in two importantrespects. Firstly, any association with self-abnegation is removed; and secondly,the value of a limited form of pride (recognition pride) is affirmed. The paper isnevertheless strongly continuous with her work, in the sense that it builds upon her rejection of universalizability on the specifc grounds that we have varying moral competences. A liberal commitment to equality should not be allowed to spill out of the political domain. We are not all equal when it comes to the demands of morality. Humility is treated as a just discernment of our own limited moral competences. As such, it is a recognition of our particularity and not a form of radical self-effacement.

U2 - 10.1017/S0034412506008808

DO - 10.1017/S0034412506008808

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 217

EP - 228

JO - Religious Studies

JF - Religious Studies

IS - 2

ER -