TY - CHAP
T1 - Mutual Recognition of Companies as an Agency Problem
AU - Borg Barthet, Justin
PY - 2020/7/24
Y1 - 2020/7/24
N2 - This chapter theorises mutual recognition and the attendant redistribution of prescriptive sovereignty as agency problems between the Member States. It takes corporate mobility as an illustrative example of mutual recognition as it operates in politically contentious aspects of internal market regulation. Worryingly, there are few mechanisms to align the interests of principal and agent. Quite the contrary. In a market for laws, a regulatory agent may be motivated to seek to maximise self-utility by undercutting the principal with a view to rendering its legal product more attractive to consumers of that product. The situation is exacerbated as a consequence of a lack of robust ex post and ex ante mechanisms which would enable the principal to limit the effects of the agent’s behaviour. In political terms, mutual recognition of companies raises two distinct questions concerning corporate decision-making. The first requires an inquiry into the nature of companies; the other related question concerns the distribution of power in the market as between European demoi. It is argued in conclusion that, while agency analysis provides lawmakers with the means to identify the extent of the democratic disconnect in the Union’s present regulatory landscape, the resolution of that disconnect requires sustained and systematic engagement with corporate law and theory with a view to replacing wholesale market-driven judicial reordering with deliberative adjustment of the choice of law and substantive rules governing European corporations.
AB - This chapter theorises mutual recognition and the attendant redistribution of prescriptive sovereignty as agency problems between the Member States. It takes corporate mobility as an illustrative example of mutual recognition as it operates in politically contentious aspects of internal market regulation. Worryingly, there are few mechanisms to align the interests of principal and agent. Quite the contrary. In a market for laws, a regulatory agent may be motivated to seek to maximise self-utility by undercutting the principal with a view to rendering its legal product more attractive to consumers of that product. The situation is exacerbated as a consequence of a lack of robust ex post and ex ante mechanisms which would enable the principal to limit the effects of the agent’s behaviour. In political terms, mutual recognition of companies raises two distinct questions concerning corporate decision-making. The first requires an inquiry into the nature of companies; the other related question concerns the distribution of power in the market as between European demoi. It is argued in conclusion that, while agency analysis provides lawmakers with the means to identify the extent of the democratic disconnect in the Union’s present regulatory landscape, the resolution of that disconnect requires sustained and systematic engagement with corporate law and theory with a view to replacing wholesale market-driven judicial reordering with deliberative adjustment of the choice of law and substantive rules governing European corporations.
UR - https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/research-handbook-on-the-politics-of-eu-law
U2 - 10.4337/9781788971287
DO - 10.4337/9781788971287
M3 - Chapter
SN - 978 1 78897 127 0
T3 - Research Handbooks in Law and Politics
SP - 300
EP - 319
BT - Research Handbook on the Politics of EU Law
A2 - Cardwell, Paul James
A2 - Granger, Marie-Pierre
PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
CY - Cheltenham
ER -