Myth and Theory: Where is The Point?

Karen Moffat Bek-Pedersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay explores the usefulness and limitations of constructing and applying various theories to a given body of myths. Taking Old Norse mythology - as this has survived into the present - as the main example, the central argument is that scholars must maintain an openness to the fact that any one theory has limitations and that myths, by their nature, will always extend beyond any one interpretation and remain open to multiple readings. The article makes a case for interdisciplinary cooperation as a very reasonable way forward in the study of myth.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheorizing Old Norse Myth
EditorsStefan Brink, Lisa Collinson
Place of PublicationTurnhout
PublisherBrepols Publishers
Pages33-46
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9782503554211
ISBN (Print)9782503553030 , 2503553036
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameActa Scandinavica
PublisherBrepols Publishers
Volume7
ISSN (Print)2466-586X
ISSN (Electronic)2565-9170

Fingerprint

myth
mythology
interpretation
present

Keywords

  • Old Norse mythology
  • Myths

Cite this

Bek-Pedersen, K. M. (2017). Myth and Theory: Where is The Point? In S. Brink, & L. Collinson (Eds.), Theorizing Old Norse Myth (pp. 33-46). (Acta Scandinavica; Vol. 7). Turnhout : Brepols Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.AS-EB.5.109618

Myth and Theory : Where is The Point? / Bek-Pedersen, Karen Moffat.

Theorizing Old Norse Myth. ed. / Stefan Brink; Lisa Collinson. Turnhout : Brepols Publishers, 2017. p. 33-46 (Acta Scandinavica; Vol. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bek-Pedersen, KM 2017, Myth and Theory: Where is The Point? in S Brink & L Collinson (eds), Theorizing Old Norse Myth. Acta Scandinavica, vol. 7, Brepols Publishers, Turnhout , pp. 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.AS-EB.5.109618
Bek-Pedersen KM. Myth and Theory: Where is The Point? In Brink S, Collinson L, editors, Theorizing Old Norse Myth. Turnhout : Brepols Publishers. 2017. p. 33-46. (Acta Scandinavica). https://doi.org/10.1484/M.AS-EB.5.109618
Bek-Pedersen, Karen Moffat. / Myth and Theory : Where is The Point?. Theorizing Old Norse Myth. editor / Stefan Brink ; Lisa Collinson. Turnhout : Brepols Publishers, 2017. pp. 33-46 (Acta Scandinavica).
@inbook{f382f72075d54738adb00f21f5a87bee,
title = "Myth and Theory: Where is The Point?",
abstract = "This essay explores the usefulness and limitations of constructing and applying various theories to a given body of myths. Taking Old Norse mythology - as this has survived into the present - as the main example, the central argument is that scholars must maintain an openness to the fact that any one theory has limitations and that myths, by their nature, will always extend beyond any one interpretation and remain open to multiple readings. The article makes a case for interdisciplinary cooperation as a very reasonable way forward in the study of myth.",
keywords = "Old Norse mythology, Myths",
author = "Bek-Pedersen, {Karen Moffat}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1484/M.AS-EB.5.109618",
language = "English",
isbn = "9782503553030",
series = "Acta Scandinavica",
publisher = "Brepols Publishers",
pages = "33--46",
editor = "Stefan Brink and Lisa Collinson",
booktitle = "Theorizing Old Norse Myth",
address = "Belgium",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Myth and Theory

T2 - Where is The Point?

AU - Bek-Pedersen, Karen Moffat

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This essay explores the usefulness and limitations of constructing and applying various theories to a given body of myths. Taking Old Norse mythology - as this has survived into the present - as the main example, the central argument is that scholars must maintain an openness to the fact that any one theory has limitations and that myths, by their nature, will always extend beyond any one interpretation and remain open to multiple readings. The article makes a case for interdisciplinary cooperation as a very reasonable way forward in the study of myth.

AB - This essay explores the usefulness and limitations of constructing and applying various theories to a given body of myths. Taking Old Norse mythology - as this has survived into the present - as the main example, the central argument is that scholars must maintain an openness to the fact that any one theory has limitations and that myths, by their nature, will always extend beyond any one interpretation and remain open to multiple readings. The article makes a case for interdisciplinary cooperation as a very reasonable way forward in the study of myth.

KW - Old Norse mythology

KW - Myths

U2 - 10.1484/M.AS-EB.5.109618

DO - 10.1484/M.AS-EB.5.109618

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9782503553030

SN - 2503553036

T3 - Acta Scandinavica

SP - 33

EP - 46

BT - Theorizing Old Norse Myth

A2 - Brink, Stefan

A2 - Collinson, Lisa

PB - Brepols Publishers

CY - Turnhout

ER -