Name Christology, Divine Aseity and the I Am Sayings in the Fourth Gospel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article will examine the representation of divine aseity in the Fourth Gospel, particularly as this is developed through a “divine name” Christology that is intertwined with the I Am sayings. While these are generally understood with reference to the statements of Isa 41:4 and 43:10, rather than Exod 3:14, the ἐγώ εἰμι form has an affinity with reflections on the temporal significance of the divine name disclosed to Moses that are elsewhere attested in Jewish tradition. This recognition opens the possibility that the I Am sayings, even as they identify Jesus with the God of Israel, are intended as reflections on the properly theological “problem” of the incarnation, on what it means for a God who transcends time to be enfleshed and particularized within it. The sayings render the identity of Jesus, as a human being located within time and place and whose substance is affected by these, as participating fully in the transcendent reality of God’s own being. By taking temporal form, the God who transcends time, and whose existence is entirely self-subsistent, unites it to his own being. The author plays upon the apparent paradox in ways that are visible in the text and that are linked to his conceptions of salvation. It is precisely the capacity to unite death to the divine life without the terminal conditions of human contingency that ensures that Jesus can be the source of life for all who receive him.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-241
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Theological Interpretation
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Names
Christology
Jesus
Deity
Saying
Fourth Gospel
Divine Names
Contingency
Render
Human Being
Salvation
Affinity
Jewish Tradition
Conception
Paradox
Transcendent
Visible
Incarnation
God of Israel

Keywords

  • Gospel of John
  • Fourth Gospel
  • aseity
  • christology
  • ontology

Cite this

Name Christology, Divine Aseity and the I Am Sayings in the Fourth Gospel. / MacAskill, Grant.

In: Journal of Theological Interpretation, Vol. 12, No. 2, 30.11.2018, p. 217-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee35fa1f1cc243b092322d9809a0c5c9,
title = "Name Christology, Divine Aseity and the I Am Sayings in the Fourth Gospel",
abstract = "This article will examine the representation of divine aseity in the Fourth Gospel, particularly as this is developed through a “divine name” Christology that is intertwined with the I Am sayings. While these are generally understood with reference to the statements of Isa 41:4 and 43:10, rather than Exod 3:14, the ἐγώ εἰμι form has an affinity with reflections on the temporal significance of the divine name disclosed to Moses that are elsewhere attested in Jewish tradition. This recognition opens the possibility that the I Am sayings, even as they identify Jesus with the God of Israel, are intended as reflections on the properly theological “problem” of the incarnation, on what it means for a God who transcends time to be enfleshed and particularized within it. The sayings render the identity of Jesus, as a human being located within time and place and whose substance is affected by these, as participating fully in the transcendent reality of God’s own being. By taking temporal form, the God who transcends time, and whose existence is entirely self-subsistent, unites it to his own being. The author plays upon the apparent paradox in ways that are visible in the text and that are linked to his conceptions of salvation. It is precisely the capacity to unite death to the divine life without the terminal conditions of human contingency that ensures that Jesus can be the source of life for all who receive him.",
keywords = "Gospel of John, Fourth Gospel, aseity, christology, ontology",
author = "Grant MacAskill",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.5325/jtheointe.12.2.0217",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "217--241",
journal = "Journal of Theological Interpretation",
issn = "1936-0843",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Name Christology, Divine Aseity and the I Am Sayings in the Fourth Gospel

AU - MacAskill, Grant

PY - 2018/11/30

Y1 - 2018/11/30

N2 - This article will examine the representation of divine aseity in the Fourth Gospel, particularly as this is developed through a “divine name” Christology that is intertwined with the I Am sayings. While these are generally understood with reference to the statements of Isa 41:4 and 43:10, rather than Exod 3:14, the ἐγώ εἰμι form has an affinity with reflections on the temporal significance of the divine name disclosed to Moses that are elsewhere attested in Jewish tradition. This recognition opens the possibility that the I Am sayings, even as they identify Jesus with the God of Israel, are intended as reflections on the properly theological “problem” of the incarnation, on what it means for a God who transcends time to be enfleshed and particularized within it. The sayings render the identity of Jesus, as a human being located within time and place and whose substance is affected by these, as participating fully in the transcendent reality of God’s own being. By taking temporal form, the God who transcends time, and whose existence is entirely self-subsistent, unites it to his own being. The author plays upon the apparent paradox in ways that are visible in the text and that are linked to his conceptions of salvation. It is precisely the capacity to unite death to the divine life without the terminal conditions of human contingency that ensures that Jesus can be the source of life for all who receive him.

AB - This article will examine the representation of divine aseity in the Fourth Gospel, particularly as this is developed through a “divine name” Christology that is intertwined with the I Am sayings. While these are generally understood with reference to the statements of Isa 41:4 and 43:10, rather than Exod 3:14, the ἐγώ εἰμι form has an affinity with reflections on the temporal significance of the divine name disclosed to Moses that are elsewhere attested in Jewish tradition. This recognition opens the possibility that the I Am sayings, even as they identify Jesus with the God of Israel, are intended as reflections on the properly theological “problem” of the incarnation, on what it means for a God who transcends time to be enfleshed and particularized within it. The sayings render the identity of Jesus, as a human being located within time and place and whose substance is affected by these, as participating fully in the transcendent reality of God’s own being. By taking temporal form, the God who transcends time, and whose existence is entirely self-subsistent, unites it to his own being. The author plays upon the apparent paradox in ways that are visible in the text and that are linked to his conceptions of salvation. It is precisely the capacity to unite death to the divine life without the terminal conditions of human contingency that ensures that Jesus can be the source of life for all who receive him.

KW - Gospel of John

KW - Fourth Gospel

KW - aseity

KW - christology

KW - ontology

U2 - 10.5325/jtheointe.12.2.0217

DO - 10.5325/jtheointe.12.2.0217

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 217

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Theological Interpretation

JF - Journal of Theological Interpretation

SN - 1936-0843

IS - 2

ER -