Natural and social order at Walt Disney World: the functions and contradictions of civilising nature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Elias' theory of the civilising process is used to show how the Walt Disney World Theme Parks construct social control over visitors without calling into question the official presentation of these visitors as free, choice-making, experience seeking individuals. Particular attention is drawn to the manipulation of images of nature as either `wild' or `civilised' to code, respectively, forbidden and legitimate places for visitors. In doing so, WDW is able to maintain civilised, non-coercive, discourse with its `guests' who are, thus presented to themselves as responsible and self-regulating persons. Attention is drawn to the contradiction that this strategy creates between `authentic' and `civilised' spectacle particularly in the presentation of animals. It is noted how this creates an imperative to show only civilised animal behaviour but which, in turn, limits the means that the Disney Corporation can adopt in order to create a space that is free from the intrusion of uncivilised nature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-317
Number of pages14
JournalThe Sociological Review
Volume54
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Cite this

Natural and social order at Walt Disney World: the functions and contradictions of civilising nature. / Wright, Christopher.

In: The Sociological Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 303-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b072463e3ac54fec9dc2905f66ab4e55,
title = "Natural and social order at Walt Disney World: the functions and contradictions of civilising nature",
abstract = "Elias' theory of the civilising process is used to show how the Walt Disney World Theme Parks construct social control over visitors without calling into question the official presentation of these visitors as free, choice-making, experience seeking individuals. Particular attention is drawn to the manipulation of images of nature as either `wild' or `civilised' to code, respectively, forbidden and legitimate places for visitors. In doing so, WDW is able to maintain civilised, non-coercive, discourse with its `guests' who are, thus presented to themselves as responsible and self-regulating persons. Attention is drawn to the contradiction that this strategy creates between `authentic' and `civilised' spectacle particularly in the presentation of animals. It is noted how this creates an imperative to show only civilised animal behaviour but which, in turn, limits the means that the Disney Corporation can adopt in order to create a space that is free from the intrusion of uncivilised nature.",
author = "Christopher Wright",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "303--317",
journal = "The Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural and social order at Walt Disney World: the functions and contradictions of civilising nature

AU - Wright, Christopher

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Elias' theory of the civilising process is used to show how the Walt Disney World Theme Parks construct social control over visitors without calling into question the official presentation of these visitors as free, choice-making, experience seeking individuals. Particular attention is drawn to the manipulation of images of nature as either `wild' or `civilised' to code, respectively, forbidden and legitimate places for visitors. In doing so, WDW is able to maintain civilised, non-coercive, discourse with its `guests' who are, thus presented to themselves as responsible and self-regulating persons. Attention is drawn to the contradiction that this strategy creates between `authentic' and `civilised' spectacle particularly in the presentation of animals. It is noted how this creates an imperative to show only civilised animal behaviour but which, in turn, limits the means that the Disney Corporation can adopt in order to create a space that is free from the intrusion of uncivilised nature.

AB - Elias' theory of the civilising process is used to show how the Walt Disney World Theme Parks construct social control over visitors without calling into question the official presentation of these visitors as free, choice-making, experience seeking individuals. Particular attention is drawn to the manipulation of images of nature as either `wild' or `civilised' to code, respectively, forbidden and legitimate places for visitors. In doing so, WDW is able to maintain civilised, non-coercive, discourse with its `guests' who are, thus presented to themselves as responsible and self-regulating persons. Attention is drawn to the contradiction that this strategy creates between `authentic' and `civilised' spectacle particularly in the presentation of animals. It is noted how this creates an imperative to show only civilised animal behaviour but which, in turn, limits the means that the Disney Corporation can adopt in order to create a space that is free from the intrusion of uncivilised nature.

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 303

EP - 317

JO - The Sociological Review

JF - The Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 2

ER -