Negative emissions-Part 1

Research landscape and synthesis

Jan C. Minx*, William F. Lamb, Max W. Callaghan, Sabine Fuss, Jerome Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann, Tim Beringer, Wagner de Oliveira Garcia, Jens Hartmann, Tarun Khanna, Dominic Lenzi, Gunnar Luderer, Gregory F. Nemet, Joeri Rogelj, Pete Smith, Jose Luis Vicente Vicente, Jennifer Wilcox, Maria del Mar Zamora Dominguez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

49 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With the Paris Agreement's ambition of limiting climate change to well below 2 degrees C, negative emission technologies (NETs) have moved into the limelight of discussions in climate science and policy. Despite several assessments, the current knowledge on NETs is still diffuse and incomplete, but also growing fast. Here, we synthesize a comprehensive body of NETs literature, using scientometric tools and performing an in-depth assessment of the quantitative and qualitative evidence therein. We clarify the role of NETs in climate change mitigation scenarios, their ethical implications, as well as the challenges involved in bringing the various NETs to the market and scaling them up in time. There are six major findings arising from our assessment: first, keeping warming below 1.5 degrees C requires the large-scale deployment of NETs, but this dependency can still be kept to a minimum for the 2 degrees C warming limit. Second, accounting for economic and biophysical limits, we identify relevant potentials for all NETs except ocean fertilization. Third, any single NET is unlikely to sustainably achieve the large NETs deployment observed in many 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C mitigation scenarios. Yet, portfolios of multiple NETs, each deployed at modest scales, could be invaluable for reaching the climate goals. Fourth, a substantial gap exists between the upscaling and rapid diffusion of NETs implied in scenarios and progress in actual innovation and deployment. If NETs are required at the scales currently discussed, the resulting urgency of implementation is currently neither reflected in science nor policy. Fifth, NETs face severe barriers to implementation and are only weakly incentivized so far. Finally, we identify distinct ethical discourses relevant for NETs, but highlight the need to root them firmly in the available evidence in order to render such discussions relevant in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number063001
Number of pages29
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume13
Issue number6
Early online date22 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • negative emissions
  • carbon dioxide removal (CDR)
  • soil carbon sequestration and biochar
  • afforestation and reforestation
  • enhanced weathering
  • direct air capture
  • bioenergy combined with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION
  • NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES
  • CARBON-DIOXIDE REMOVAL
  • 1.5 DEGREES-C
  • OCEAN FERTILIZATION
  • POLICY CHOICES
  • CO2 REMOVAL
  • ETHICS
  • TECHNOLOGIES
  • SCENARIOS

Cite this

Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Fuss, S., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., ... Dominguez, M. D. M. Z. (2018). Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), [063001]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b

Negative emissions-Part 1 : Research landscape and synthesis. / Minx, Jan C.; Lamb, William F.; Callaghan, Max W.; Fuss, Sabine; Hilaire, Jerome; Creutzig, Felix; Amann, Thorben; Beringer, Tim; Garcia, Wagner de Oliveira; Hartmann, Jens; Khanna, Tarun; Lenzi, Dominic; Luderer, Gunnar; Nemet, Gregory F.; Rogelj, Joeri; Smith, Pete; Vicente, Jose Luis Vicente; Wilcox, Jennifer; Dominguez, Maria del Mar Zamora.

In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, No. 6, 063001, 06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Minx, JC, Lamb, WF, Callaghan, MW, Fuss, S, Hilaire, J, Creutzig, F, Amann, T, Beringer, T, Garcia, WDO, Hartmann, J, Khanna, T, Lenzi, D, Luderer, G, Nemet, GF, Rogelj, J, Smith, P, Vicente, JLV, Wilcox, J & Dominguez, MDMZ 2018, 'Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, no. 6, 063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b
Minx JC, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Fuss S, Hilaire J, Creutzig F et al. Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. Environmental Research Letters. 2018 Jun;13(6). 063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b
Minx, Jan C. ; Lamb, William F. ; Callaghan, Max W. ; Fuss, Sabine ; Hilaire, Jerome ; Creutzig, Felix ; Amann, Thorben ; Beringer, Tim ; Garcia, Wagner de Oliveira ; Hartmann, Jens ; Khanna, Tarun ; Lenzi, Dominic ; Luderer, Gunnar ; Nemet, Gregory F. ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Smith, Pete ; Vicente, Jose Luis Vicente ; Wilcox, Jennifer ; Dominguez, Maria del Mar Zamora. / Negative emissions-Part 1 : Research landscape and synthesis. In: Environmental Research Letters. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 6.
@article{67c12504d152402e939c3ba3aa4c67a3,
title = "Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis",
abstract = "With the Paris Agreement's ambition of limiting climate change to well below 2 degrees C, negative emission technologies (NETs) have moved into the limelight of discussions in climate science and policy. Despite several assessments, the current knowledge on NETs is still diffuse and incomplete, but also growing fast. Here, we synthesize a comprehensive body of NETs literature, using scientometric tools and performing an in-depth assessment of the quantitative and qualitative evidence therein. We clarify the role of NETs in climate change mitigation scenarios, their ethical implications, as well as the challenges involved in bringing the various NETs to the market and scaling them up in time. There are six major findings arising from our assessment: first, keeping warming below 1.5 degrees C requires the large-scale deployment of NETs, but this dependency can still be kept to a minimum for the 2 degrees C warming limit. Second, accounting for economic and biophysical limits, we identify relevant potentials for all NETs except ocean fertilization. Third, any single NET is unlikely to sustainably achieve the large NETs deployment observed in many 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C mitigation scenarios. Yet, portfolios of multiple NETs, each deployed at modest scales, could be invaluable for reaching the climate goals. Fourth, a substantial gap exists between the upscaling and rapid diffusion of NETs implied in scenarios and progress in actual innovation and deployment. If NETs are required at the scales currently discussed, the resulting urgency of implementation is currently neither reflected in science nor policy. Fifth, NETs face severe barriers to implementation and are only weakly incentivized so far. Finally, we identify distinct ethical discourses relevant for NETs, but highlight the need to root them firmly in the available evidence in order to render such discussions relevant in practice.",
keywords = "negative emissions, carbon dioxide removal (CDR), soil carbon sequestration and biochar, afforestation and reforestation, enhanced weathering, direct air capture, bioenergy combined with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION, NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES, CARBON-DIOXIDE REMOVAL, 1.5 DEGREES-C, OCEAN FERTILIZATION, POLICY CHOICES, CO2 REMOVAL, ETHICS, TECHNOLOGIES, SCENARIOS",
author = "Minx, {Jan C.} and Lamb, {William F.} and Callaghan, {Max W.} and Sabine Fuss and Jerome Hilaire and Felix Creutzig and Thorben Amann and Tim Beringer and Garcia, {Wagner de Oliveira} and Jens Hartmann and Tarun Khanna and Dominic Lenzi and Gunnar Luderer and Nemet, {Gregory F.} and Joeri Rogelj and Pete Smith and Vicente, {Jose Luis Vicente} and Jennifer Wilcox and Dominguez, {Maria del Mar Zamora}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative emissions-Part 1

T2 - Research landscape and synthesis

AU - Minx, Jan C.

AU - Lamb, William F.

AU - Callaghan, Max W.

AU - Fuss, Sabine

AU - Hilaire, Jerome

AU - Creutzig, Felix

AU - Amann, Thorben

AU - Beringer, Tim

AU - Garcia, Wagner de Oliveira

AU - Hartmann, Jens

AU - Khanna, Tarun

AU - Lenzi, Dominic

AU - Luderer, Gunnar

AU - Nemet, Gregory F.

AU - Rogelj, Joeri

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Vicente, Jose Luis Vicente

AU - Wilcox, Jennifer

AU - Dominguez, Maria del Mar Zamora

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - With the Paris Agreement's ambition of limiting climate change to well below 2 degrees C, negative emission technologies (NETs) have moved into the limelight of discussions in climate science and policy. Despite several assessments, the current knowledge on NETs is still diffuse and incomplete, but also growing fast. Here, we synthesize a comprehensive body of NETs literature, using scientometric tools and performing an in-depth assessment of the quantitative and qualitative evidence therein. We clarify the role of NETs in climate change mitigation scenarios, their ethical implications, as well as the challenges involved in bringing the various NETs to the market and scaling them up in time. There are six major findings arising from our assessment: first, keeping warming below 1.5 degrees C requires the large-scale deployment of NETs, but this dependency can still be kept to a minimum for the 2 degrees C warming limit. Second, accounting for economic and biophysical limits, we identify relevant potentials for all NETs except ocean fertilization. Third, any single NET is unlikely to sustainably achieve the large NETs deployment observed in many 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C mitigation scenarios. Yet, portfolios of multiple NETs, each deployed at modest scales, could be invaluable for reaching the climate goals. Fourth, a substantial gap exists between the upscaling and rapid diffusion of NETs implied in scenarios and progress in actual innovation and deployment. If NETs are required at the scales currently discussed, the resulting urgency of implementation is currently neither reflected in science nor policy. Fifth, NETs face severe barriers to implementation and are only weakly incentivized so far. Finally, we identify distinct ethical discourses relevant for NETs, but highlight the need to root them firmly in the available evidence in order to render such discussions relevant in practice.

AB - With the Paris Agreement's ambition of limiting climate change to well below 2 degrees C, negative emission technologies (NETs) have moved into the limelight of discussions in climate science and policy. Despite several assessments, the current knowledge on NETs is still diffuse and incomplete, but also growing fast. Here, we synthesize a comprehensive body of NETs literature, using scientometric tools and performing an in-depth assessment of the quantitative and qualitative evidence therein. We clarify the role of NETs in climate change mitigation scenarios, their ethical implications, as well as the challenges involved in bringing the various NETs to the market and scaling them up in time. There are six major findings arising from our assessment: first, keeping warming below 1.5 degrees C requires the large-scale deployment of NETs, but this dependency can still be kept to a minimum for the 2 degrees C warming limit. Second, accounting for economic and biophysical limits, we identify relevant potentials for all NETs except ocean fertilization. Third, any single NET is unlikely to sustainably achieve the large NETs deployment observed in many 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C mitigation scenarios. Yet, portfolios of multiple NETs, each deployed at modest scales, could be invaluable for reaching the climate goals. Fourth, a substantial gap exists between the upscaling and rapid diffusion of NETs implied in scenarios and progress in actual innovation and deployment. If NETs are required at the scales currently discussed, the resulting urgency of implementation is currently neither reflected in science nor policy. Fifth, NETs face severe barriers to implementation and are only weakly incentivized so far. Finally, we identify distinct ethical discourses relevant for NETs, but highlight the need to root them firmly in the available evidence in order to render such discussions relevant in practice.

KW - negative emissions

KW - carbon dioxide removal (CDR)

KW - soil carbon sequestration and biochar

KW - afforestation and reforestation

KW - enhanced weathering

KW - direct air capture

KW - bioenergy combined with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

KW - CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION

KW - NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES

KW - CARBON-DIOXIDE REMOVAL

KW - 1.5 DEGREES-C

KW - OCEAN FERTILIZATION

KW - POLICY CHOICES

KW - CO2 REMOVAL

KW - ETHICS

KW - TECHNOLOGIES

KW - SCENARIOS

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 6

M1 - 063001

ER -