Negotiation and regulation of land access agreements

lessons from Queensland

Katherine Curnow (Corresponding Author), Tina Hunter, Michael Weir, Laurence Boulle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Unconventional gas resources (UGR) development activities in Queensland
frequently require co-existential use of private land by petroleum companies and private landholders. This situation in turn necessitates transactional negotiations between private landholders and petroleum companies about access to landholders’ private land to undertake UGR development activities. Concerns about these negotiations have led to the Queensland Government attempting to regulate aspects of these processes. This article utilises interview data from a pilot study conducted by the authors to examine private landholder perceptions of negotiations that have taken place over the last decade. In particular, it explores what the data reveals about a number of factors relevant to the justifiable regulatory objective of managing information asymmetry and unconstructive negotiation tactics and behaviours by and between the parties. The analysis in this article demonstrates the need to promote integrative dimensions of the negotiations and reasonable and good faith conduct in the negotiations by all parties, as well as the imperative of ensuring landholders receives sufficient information. The analysis and recommendations can inform the design of new regulatory regimes or the refinement of existing arrangements in Australian and international jurisdictions where there are co-existential UGR development activities and private land use, particularly in New South Wales and Western Australia which are yet to finalise their regulatory regimes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-135
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of World Energy Law and Business
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

regulation
resources
asymmetry
tactics
faith
jurisdiction
land use
interview

Keywords

  • Australia
  • shale
  • contract
  • regulation
  • landholders
  • negotiation

Cite this

Negotiation and regulation of land access agreements : lessons from Queensland. / Curnow, Katherine (Corresponding Author); Hunter, Tina; Weir, Michael; Boulle, Laurence.

In: Journal of World Energy Law and Business, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 117-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curnow, Katherine ; Hunter, Tina ; Weir, Michael ; Boulle, Laurence. / Negotiation and regulation of land access agreements : lessons from Queensland. In: Journal of World Energy Law and Business. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 117-135.
@article{89e7d509e40a4448a9e76016dc6f0c9f,
title = "Negotiation and regulation of land access agreements: lessons from Queensland",
abstract = "Unconventional gas resources (UGR) development activities in Queenslandfrequently require co-existential use of private land by petroleum companies and private landholders. This situation in turn necessitates transactional negotiations between private landholders and petroleum companies about access to landholders’ private land to undertake UGR development activities. Concerns about these negotiations have led to the Queensland Government attempting to regulate aspects of these processes. This article utilises interview data from a pilot study conducted by the authors to examine private landholder perceptions of negotiations that have taken place over the last decade. In particular, it explores what the data reveals about a number of factors relevant to the justifiable regulatory objective of managing information asymmetry and unconstructive negotiation tactics and behaviours by and between the parties. The analysis in this article demonstrates the need to promote integrative dimensions of the negotiations and reasonable and good faith conduct in the negotiations by all parties, as well as the imperative of ensuring landholders receives sufficient information. The analysis and recommendations can inform the design of new regulatory regimes or the refinement of existing arrangements in Australian and international jurisdictions where there are co-existential UGR development activities and private land use, particularly in New South Wales and Western Australia which are yet to finalise their regulatory regimes.",
keywords = "Australia, shale, contract, regulation, landholders, negotiation",
author = "Katherine Curnow and Tina Hunter and Michael Weir and Laurence Boulle",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jwelb/jwx003",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "117--135",
journal = "Journal of World Energy Law and Business",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negotiation and regulation of land access agreements

T2 - lessons from Queensland

AU - Curnow, Katherine

AU - Hunter, Tina

AU - Weir, Michael

AU - Boulle, Laurence

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Unconventional gas resources (UGR) development activities in Queenslandfrequently require co-existential use of private land by petroleum companies and private landholders. This situation in turn necessitates transactional negotiations between private landholders and petroleum companies about access to landholders’ private land to undertake UGR development activities. Concerns about these negotiations have led to the Queensland Government attempting to regulate aspects of these processes. This article utilises interview data from a pilot study conducted by the authors to examine private landholder perceptions of negotiations that have taken place over the last decade. In particular, it explores what the data reveals about a number of factors relevant to the justifiable regulatory objective of managing information asymmetry and unconstructive negotiation tactics and behaviours by and between the parties. The analysis in this article demonstrates the need to promote integrative dimensions of the negotiations and reasonable and good faith conduct in the negotiations by all parties, as well as the imperative of ensuring landholders receives sufficient information. The analysis and recommendations can inform the design of new regulatory regimes or the refinement of existing arrangements in Australian and international jurisdictions where there are co-existential UGR development activities and private land use, particularly in New South Wales and Western Australia which are yet to finalise their regulatory regimes.

AB - Unconventional gas resources (UGR) development activities in Queenslandfrequently require co-existential use of private land by petroleum companies and private landholders. This situation in turn necessitates transactional negotiations between private landholders and petroleum companies about access to landholders’ private land to undertake UGR development activities. Concerns about these negotiations have led to the Queensland Government attempting to regulate aspects of these processes. This article utilises interview data from a pilot study conducted by the authors to examine private landholder perceptions of negotiations that have taken place over the last decade. In particular, it explores what the data reveals about a number of factors relevant to the justifiable regulatory objective of managing information asymmetry and unconstructive negotiation tactics and behaviours by and between the parties. The analysis in this article demonstrates the need to promote integrative dimensions of the negotiations and reasonable and good faith conduct in the negotiations by all parties, as well as the imperative of ensuring landholders receives sufficient information. The analysis and recommendations can inform the design of new regulatory regimes or the refinement of existing arrangements in Australian and international jurisdictions where there are co-existential UGR development activities and private land use, particularly in New South Wales and Western Australia which are yet to finalise their regulatory regimes.

KW - Australia

KW - shale

KW - contract

KW - regulation

KW - landholders

KW - negotiation

U2 - 10.1093/jwelb/jwx003

DO - 10.1093/jwelb/jwx003

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 117

EP - 135

JO - Journal of World Energy Law and Business

JF - Journal of World Energy Law and Business

IS - 2

ER -