Abstract
Introduction: All-Terrain Vehicles (ATV) are a popular piece of farming machinery but are linked to many fatalities and injuries every year. Despite evidence that ATV helmets reduce the risk of serious or fatal injury, research suggests that few farmers wear them. The aim of this study was to explore farmer attitudes toward ATV helmets, using the COM-B model as a framework to identify key barriers and enablers of helmet use and suggest potential interventions to increase helmet use in agriculture. Methods: A mixed-methods online survey featuring quantitative and qualitative questions was used to explore key
attitudinal factors relevant to farmer helmet wearing. A total of 211 UK and Irish farmers were recruited,
including farm owners, managers, workers, and contractors. Results: Personal exemption from risk, emo-
tional benefits, cognitive barriers, and guideline prompts were all found to be significant predictors of
farmer helmet wearing. Key categories within the qualitative data indicated that helmet properties, risk
perception, farming culture, and the farming environment could all function as barriers to helmet wear-
ing. Suggested enablers of helmet use included increasing helmet availability and enhancing awareness
of the consequences of ATV accidents. Conclusions: The key barriers and enablers presented within this
paper highlight the relevance of capability (helmet design, time pressure), opportunity (social norms),
and motivation (perceived control of risk) when considering farmer helmet wearing behaviors. In order
to encourage farmers to wear helmets it will be necessary to design specific interventions using the beha-
vior change wheel. Practical applications: Key interventions to prompt helmet use include the inclusion of
more cues to prompt helmet wearing (e.g., stickers on the ATV), enhanced training and education, and
modelling (e.g., key farming figures shown to wear helmets in the media)
attitudinal factors relevant to farmer helmet wearing. A total of 211 UK and Irish farmers were recruited,
including farm owners, managers, workers, and contractors. Results: Personal exemption from risk, emo-
tional benefits, cognitive barriers, and guideline prompts were all found to be significant predictors of
farmer helmet wearing. Key categories within the qualitative data indicated that helmet properties, risk
perception, farming culture, and the farming environment could all function as barriers to helmet wear-
ing. Suggested enablers of helmet use included increasing helmet availability and enhancing awareness
of the consequences of ATV accidents. Conclusions: The key barriers and enablers presented within this
paper highlight the relevance of capability (helmet design, time pressure), opportunity (social norms),
and motivation (perceived control of risk) when considering farmer helmet wearing behaviors. In order
to encourage farmers to wear helmets it will be necessary to design specific interventions using the beha-
vior change wheel. Practical applications: Key interventions to prompt helmet use include the inclusion of
more cues to prompt helmet wearing (e.g., stickers on the ATV), enhanced training and education, and
modelling (e.g., key farming figures shown to wear helmets in the media)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 123-133 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Safety Research |
Volume | 81 |
Early online date | 16 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- safety
- ATV
- Farming
- Com-B
- Helmet Wearing
- interventions