TY - GEN
T1 - Norm Conflict Identification using Deep Learning
AU - Aires, João Paulo
AU - Meneguzzi, Felipe
N1 - Aires, J.P., Meneguzzi, F. (2017). Norm Conflict Identification Using Deep Learning. In: Sukthankar, G., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. (eds) Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10643. Springer, Cham.
International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: AAMAS 2017: Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems pp 194–207
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank Google Research Awards for Latin America for funding our project.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Contracts represent agreements between two or more parties formally in the form of deontic statements or norms within their clauses. If not carefully designed, such conflicts may invalidate an entire contract, and thus human reviewers invest great effort to write conflict-free contracts that, for complex and long contracts, can be time consuming and error-prone. In this work, we develop an approach to automate the identification of potential conflicts between norms in contracts. We build a two-phase approach that uses traditional machine learning together with deep learning to extract and compare norms in order to identify conflicts between them. Using a manually annotated set of conflicts as train and test set, our approach obtains 85% accuracy, establishing a new state-of-the art.
AB - Contracts represent agreements between two or more parties formally in the form of deontic statements or norms within their clauses. If not carefully designed, such conflicts may invalidate an entire contract, and thus human reviewers invest great effort to write conflict-free contracts that, for complex and long contracts, can be time consuming and error-prone. In this work, we develop an approach to automate the identification of potential conflicts between norms in contracts. We build a two-phase approach that uses traditional machine learning together with deep learning to extract and compare norms in order to identify conflicts between them. Using a manually annotated set of conflicts as train and test set, our approach obtains 85% accuracy, establishing a new state-of-the art.
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-71679-4_13
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-71679-4_13
M3 - Published conference contribution
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 194
EP - 207
BT - Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2017
A2 - Sukthankar, G
A2 - Rodriguez-Aguilar, J
PB - Springer
ER -