Nuclear Hardship or Variant Dependency? Households and the Scottish Poor Law

John Andrew Dale Blaikie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 'nuclear hardship' hypothesis claims that where nuclear families predominated collective aid prevailed, whereas extended households were coextensive with kin-based support. This article tests this assumption by considering the relationship between households and the Poor Law in Lowland Scots communities after 1845. While cross-sectional census data are inconclusive, a longitudinal analysis based on case study evidence, including temporary as well as permanent relief patterns, suggests that 'nuclear hardship' might be replaced by a model that matches household structure with the varying sources of aid given during critical life situations while focusing upon applicants as negotiators rather than victims.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-280
Number of pages27
JournalContinuity and Change
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2002

Cite this

Nuclear Hardship or Variant Dependency? Households and the Scottish Poor Law. / Blaikie, John Andrew Dale.

In: Continuity and Change, Vol. 17, No. 2, 08.2002, p. 253-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blaikie, John Andrew Dale. / Nuclear Hardship or Variant Dependency? Households and the Scottish Poor Law. In: Continuity and Change. 2002 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 253-280.
@article{0f1c3443688f4a6c9eb039308b1b8a63,
title = "Nuclear Hardship or Variant Dependency? Households and the Scottish Poor Law",
abstract = "The 'nuclear hardship' hypothesis claims that where nuclear families predominated collective aid prevailed, whereas extended households were coextensive with kin-based support. This article tests this assumption by considering the relationship between households and the Poor Law in Lowland Scots communities after 1845. While cross-sectional census data are inconclusive, a longitudinal analysis based on case study evidence, including temporary as well as permanent relief patterns, suggests that 'nuclear hardship' might be replaced by a model that matches household structure with the varying sources of aid given during critical life situations while focusing upon applicants as negotiators rather than victims.",
author = "Blaikie, {John Andrew Dale}",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0268416002004204",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "253--280",
journal = "Continuity and Change",
issn = "0268-4160",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nuclear Hardship or Variant Dependency? Households and the Scottish Poor Law

AU - Blaikie, John Andrew Dale

PY - 2002/8

Y1 - 2002/8

N2 - The 'nuclear hardship' hypothesis claims that where nuclear families predominated collective aid prevailed, whereas extended households were coextensive with kin-based support. This article tests this assumption by considering the relationship between households and the Poor Law in Lowland Scots communities after 1845. While cross-sectional census data are inconclusive, a longitudinal analysis based on case study evidence, including temporary as well as permanent relief patterns, suggests that 'nuclear hardship' might be replaced by a model that matches household structure with the varying sources of aid given during critical life situations while focusing upon applicants as negotiators rather than victims.

AB - The 'nuclear hardship' hypothesis claims that where nuclear families predominated collective aid prevailed, whereas extended households were coextensive with kin-based support. This article tests this assumption by considering the relationship between households and the Poor Law in Lowland Scots communities after 1845. While cross-sectional census data are inconclusive, a longitudinal analysis based on case study evidence, including temporary as well as permanent relief patterns, suggests that 'nuclear hardship' might be replaced by a model that matches household structure with the varying sources of aid given during critical life situations while focusing upon applicants as negotiators rather than victims.

U2 - 10.1017/S0268416002004204

DO - 10.1017/S0268416002004204

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 253

EP - 280

JO - Continuity and Change

JF - Continuity and Change

SN - 0268-4160

IS - 2

ER -