TY - JOUR
T1 - Obama’s leadership style: Enabling transatlantic allies in Libya and Mali
AU - Paquin, J.
AU - Massie, J.
AU - Beauregard, P.
N1 - Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Philippe Lagassé and David Haglund for their comments on previous versions of this paper as well as Doriane Angers and Marion Guay-Arcand for research assistance. The authors are also grateful to Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Fonds de recherche du Québec sur la société et la culture.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This article assesses President Obama’s transatlantic leadership style with regard to foreign crises and it contrasts it with the style of the previous Bush administration. It argues that the Obama administration exercises what we call enabling leadership, which implies that the US does lead, but that it does not feel the need to project ‘leadership from the front’. The article first analyses the diplomatic aspect of leadership by focusing on the ‘speaking order’ among the United States and three of its core allies, namely the United Kingdom, France and Canada. It presents a computer-assisted content analysis of the 482 official statements issued by these four states in response to the crisis in Libya in 2011 and Mali in 2012–2013. The paper then performs a detailed analysis of the financial and military contributions of the US and its allies to confront these crises. It provides qualitative and quantitative evidence suggesting that the Obama administration consciously adopted enabling leadership, a strategy that is consistent with the worldview of the president and his foreign policy entourage.
AB - This article assesses President Obama’s transatlantic leadership style with regard to foreign crises and it contrasts it with the style of the previous Bush administration. It argues that the Obama administration exercises what we call enabling leadership, which implies that the US does lead, but that it does not feel the need to project ‘leadership from the front’. The article first analyses the diplomatic aspect of leadership by focusing on the ‘speaking order’ among the United States and three of its core allies, namely the United Kingdom, France and Canada. It presents a computer-assisted content analysis of the 482 official statements issued by these four states in response to the crisis in Libya in 2011 and Mali in 2012–2013. The paper then performs a detailed analysis of the financial and military contributions of the US and its allies to confront these crises. It provides qualitative and quantitative evidence suggesting that the Obama administration consciously adopted enabling leadership, a strategy that is consistent with the worldview of the president and his foreign policy entourage.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85007273842&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1080/14794012.2016.1268793
DO - 10.1080/14794012.2016.1268793
M3 - Article
VL - 15
SP - 184
EP - 206
JO - Journal of Transatlantic Studies
JF - Journal of Transatlantic Studies
SN - 1479-4012
IS - 2
ER -