Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery

C. MacArthur, C. M. A. Glazener, P. D. Wilson, G. P. Herbison, H. Gee, G. D. Lang, R. Lancashire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

118 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To determine whether obstetric and maternal factors relate to faecal incontinence at three months postpartum.

Setting Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand).

Population All women who delivered during one year in the three maternity units.

Methods Postal questionnaire at three months postpartum, to obtain information on faecal incontinence, linked to obstetric casenote data.

Main outcome measures Prevalence of faecal incontinence.

Results 7879 questionnaires were returned, a 71.7% response rate. The prevalence of faecal incontinence was 9.6%. with 4.2% reporting this more often than rarely. Logistic regression, confined to primiparae, showed that forceps delivery was a predictor of an increased risk of symptoms (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.89) while vacuum extraction was not associated. Caesarean section was marginally associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.97). Older maternal age, Indian sub-continent ethnic origin and body mass index 'not known' also showed significant associations. No associations were found for induced labour, duration of second stage labour, episiotomy, laceration or birthweight.

Conclusions Women delivered by forceps had almost twice the risk of developing faecal incontinence, whereas vacuum extraction was not associated with faecal incontinence at three months postpartum. Caesarean section appears to offer some protection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)678-683
Number of pages6
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume108
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2001

Keywords

  • anal-sphincter trauma
  • fecal incontinence
  • vaginal delivery
  • instrumental delivery
  • forceps
  • childbirth
  • health
  • women

Cite this

Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery. / MacArthur, C.; Glazener, C. M. A.; Wilson, P. D.; Herbison, G. P.; Gee, H.; Lang, G. D.; Lancashire, R.

In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 108, No. 7, 07.2001, p. 678-683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacArthur, C. ; Glazener, C. M. A. ; Wilson, P. D. ; Herbison, G. P. ; Gee, H. ; Lang, G. D. ; Lancashire, R. / Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery. In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001 ; Vol. 108, No. 7. pp. 678-683.
@article{20d87d4930bf49568d931e852c8dcd9f,
title = "Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery",
abstract = "Objective To determine whether obstetric and maternal factors relate to faecal incontinence at three months postpartum.Setting Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand).Population All women who delivered during one year in the three maternity units.Methods Postal questionnaire at three months postpartum, to obtain information on faecal incontinence, linked to obstetric casenote data.Main outcome measures Prevalence of faecal incontinence.Results 7879 questionnaires were returned, a 71.7{\%} response rate. The prevalence of faecal incontinence was 9.6{\%}. with 4.2{\%} reporting this more often than rarely. Logistic regression, confined to primiparae, showed that forceps delivery was a predictor of an increased risk of symptoms (OR = 1.94, 95{\%} CI 1.30 to 2.89) while vacuum extraction was not associated. Caesarean section was marginally associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.58, 95{\%} CI 0.35 to 0.97). Older maternal age, Indian sub-continent ethnic origin and body mass index 'not known' also showed significant associations. No associations were found for induced labour, duration of second stage labour, episiotomy, laceration or birthweight.Conclusions Women delivered by forceps had almost twice the risk of developing faecal incontinence, whereas vacuum extraction was not associated with faecal incontinence at three months postpartum. Caesarean section appears to offer some protection.",
keywords = "anal-sphincter trauma, fecal incontinence, vaginal delivery, instrumental delivery, forceps, childbirth, health, women",
author = "C. MacArthur and Glazener, {C. M. A.} and Wilson, {P. D.} and Herbison, {G. P.} and H. Gee and Lang, {G. D.} and R. Lancashire",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00183.x",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "678--683",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery

AU - MacArthur, C.

AU - Glazener, C. M. A.

AU - Wilson, P. D.

AU - Herbison, G. P.

AU - Gee, H.

AU - Lang, G. D.

AU - Lancashire, R.

PY - 2001/7

Y1 - 2001/7

N2 - Objective To determine whether obstetric and maternal factors relate to faecal incontinence at three months postpartum.Setting Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand).Population All women who delivered during one year in the three maternity units.Methods Postal questionnaire at three months postpartum, to obtain information on faecal incontinence, linked to obstetric casenote data.Main outcome measures Prevalence of faecal incontinence.Results 7879 questionnaires were returned, a 71.7% response rate. The prevalence of faecal incontinence was 9.6%. with 4.2% reporting this more often than rarely. Logistic regression, confined to primiparae, showed that forceps delivery was a predictor of an increased risk of symptoms (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.89) while vacuum extraction was not associated. Caesarean section was marginally associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.97). Older maternal age, Indian sub-continent ethnic origin and body mass index 'not known' also showed significant associations. No associations were found for induced labour, duration of second stage labour, episiotomy, laceration or birthweight.Conclusions Women delivered by forceps had almost twice the risk of developing faecal incontinence, whereas vacuum extraction was not associated with faecal incontinence at three months postpartum. Caesarean section appears to offer some protection.

AB - Objective To determine whether obstetric and maternal factors relate to faecal incontinence at three months postpartum.Setting Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand).Population All women who delivered during one year in the three maternity units.Methods Postal questionnaire at three months postpartum, to obtain information on faecal incontinence, linked to obstetric casenote data.Main outcome measures Prevalence of faecal incontinence.Results 7879 questionnaires were returned, a 71.7% response rate. The prevalence of faecal incontinence was 9.6%. with 4.2% reporting this more often than rarely. Logistic regression, confined to primiparae, showed that forceps delivery was a predictor of an increased risk of symptoms (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.89) while vacuum extraction was not associated. Caesarean section was marginally associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.97). Older maternal age, Indian sub-continent ethnic origin and body mass index 'not known' also showed significant associations. No associations were found for induced labour, duration of second stage labour, episiotomy, laceration or birthweight.Conclusions Women delivered by forceps had almost twice the risk of developing faecal incontinence, whereas vacuum extraction was not associated with faecal incontinence at three months postpartum. Caesarean section appears to offer some protection.

KW - anal-sphincter trauma

KW - fecal incontinence

KW - vaginal delivery

KW - instrumental delivery

KW - forceps

KW - childbirth

KW - health

KW - women

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00183.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00183.x

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 678

EP - 683

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 7

ER -