Occupational Health and Safety Management in Organizations

A Review

Michael Zanko, Patrick Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In examining the research literature on occupational health and safety (OHS), this paper argues that the growth in the number of specialists in OHS has resulted in an emphasis on policy and practice away from more scholastic concerns previously addressed by academics in the disciplines of psychology and sociology. A hiatus has occurred, and this is evidenced by the general absence of studies in management, even though OHS is increasingly seen as a key operational and strategic concern of business organizations. The authors call for OHS to be placed firmly on the research agenda of management scholars, and advocate the need for greater conceptual development, empirical study and theoretical reflection to complement existing pragmatic concerns of OHS specialists. In this review, the contributions of psychology, sociology, industrial relations and management studies are assessed, and five categories of specialist OHS literature are analysed, namely: prescriptive; systematic OHS management; success based; error and disaster based; and culture, climate and high-reliability studies. The conceptual and methodological limitations of this specialist focus are discussed, and future research opportunities are highlighted, for which the authors argue that management scholars embrace a range of methodological approaches. The authors advocate the value of extended case studies which examine OHS in context and over time in particular workplace settings. There remains considerable scope to develop this field further and, in conclusion, particular attention is drawn to the value of process-oriented contextual approaches for understanding OHS management in organizations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)328-344
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date18 Aug 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Health
Industrial management
Industrial relations
Occupational health
Occupational safety and health
Health management
Safety management
Disasters
Industry
Sociology
Psychology

Cite this

Occupational Health and Safety Management in Organizations : A Review. / Zanko, Michael; Dawson, Patrick.

In: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 328-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ed8afc5a3274015be3da604563e7a65,
title = "Occupational Health and Safety Management in Organizations: A Review",
abstract = "In examining the research literature on occupational health and safety (OHS), this paper argues that the growth in the number of specialists in OHS has resulted in an emphasis on policy and practice away from more scholastic concerns previously addressed by academics in the disciplines of psychology and sociology. A hiatus has occurred, and this is evidenced by the general absence of studies in management, even though OHS is increasingly seen as a key operational and strategic concern of business organizations. The authors call for OHS to be placed firmly on the research agenda of management scholars, and advocate the need for greater conceptual development, empirical study and theoretical reflection to complement existing pragmatic concerns of OHS specialists. In this review, the contributions of psychology, sociology, industrial relations and management studies are assessed, and five categories of specialist OHS literature are analysed, namely: prescriptive; systematic OHS management; success based; error and disaster based; and culture, climate and high-reliability studies. The conceptual and methodological limitations of this specialist focus are discussed, and future research opportunities are highlighted, for which the authors argue that management scholars embrace a range of methodological approaches. The authors advocate the value of extended case studies which examine OHS in context and over time in particular workplace settings. There remains considerable scope to develop this field further and, in conclusion, particular attention is drawn to the value of process-oriented contextual approaches for understanding OHS management in organizations.",
author = "Michael Zanko and Patrick Dawson",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00319.x",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "328--344",
journal = "International Journal of Management Reviews",
issn = "1460-8545",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational Health and Safety Management in Organizations

T2 - A Review

AU - Zanko, Michael

AU - Dawson, Patrick

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - In examining the research literature on occupational health and safety (OHS), this paper argues that the growth in the number of specialists in OHS has resulted in an emphasis on policy and practice away from more scholastic concerns previously addressed by academics in the disciplines of psychology and sociology. A hiatus has occurred, and this is evidenced by the general absence of studies in management, even though OHS is increasingly seen as a key operational and strategic concern of business organizations. The authors call for OHS to be placed firmly on the research agenda of management scholars, and advocate the need for greater conceptual development, empirical study and theoretical reflection to complement existing pragmatic concerns of OHS specialists. In this review, the contributions of psychology, sociology, industrial relations and management studies are assessed, and five categories of specialist OHS literature are analysed, namely: prescriptive; systematic OHS management; success based; error and disaster based; and culture, climate and high-reliability studies. The conceptual and methodological limitations of this specialist focus are discussed, and future research opportunities are highlighted, for which the authors argue that management scholars embrace a range of methodological approaches. The authors advocate the value of extended case studies which examine OHS in context and over time in particular workplace settings. There remains considerable scope to develop this field further and, in conclusion, particular attention is drawn to the value of process-oriented contextual approaches for understanding OHS management in organizations.

AB - In examining the research literature on occupational health and safety (OHS), this paper argues that the growth in the number of specialists in OHS has resulted in an emphasis on policy and practice away from more scholastic concerns previously addressed by academics in the disciplines of psychology and sociology. A hiatus has occurred, and this is evidenced by the general absence of studies in management, even though OHS is increasingly seen as a key operational and strategic concern of business organizations. The authors call for OHS to be placed firmly on the research agenda of management scholars, and advocate the need for greater conceptual development, empirical study and theoretical reflection to complement existing pragmatic concerns of OHS specialists. In this review, the contributions of psychology, sociology, industrial relations and management studies are assessed, and five categories of specialist OHS literature are analysed, namely: prescriptive; systematic OHS management; success based; error and disaster based; and culture, climate and high-reliability studies. The conceptual and methodological limitations of this specialist focus are discussed, and future research opportunities are highlighted, for which the authors argue that management scholars embrace a range of methodological approaches. The authors advocate the value of extended case studies which examine OHS in context and over time in particular workplace settings. There remains considerable scope to develop this field further and, in conclusion, particular attention is drawn to the value of process-oriented contextual approaches for understanding OHS management in organizations.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00319.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00319.x

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 328

EP - 344

JO - International Journal of Management Reviews

JF - International Journal of Management Reviews

SN - 1460-8545

IS - 3

ER -