Occurrence of Raynaud's phenomenon in children ages 12-15 years: prevalence and association with other common symptoms

Gareth Jones, Ariane L Herrick, Sarah E Woodham, Eileen M Baildam, Gary Macfarlane, Alan J Silman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Although Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in adults is frequently reported as having been present since childhood, there have been no studies on the prevalence of RIP in children. This study was undertaken to ascertain the prevalence of RP in children ages 12-15 years and to determine whether, as with other commonly reported symptoms, there were any associations with adverse psychosocial factors.

Methods. A previously validated self-administered RIP questionnaire was distributed to 903 children ages 12-15 years, from 28 schools. The questionnaire also included questions on other common childhood symptoms and on adverse psychosocial factors.

Results. Seven hundred twenty children responded (80%), in whom the prevalence of RP was 15%. This was higher in girls (18% versus 12%) and increased with age. After adjustment for age and sex, there was an association with reporting of current pain, both in the arm/shoulder region and elsewhere in the body. There were no associations with psychosocial variables.

Conclusion. RP is frequent in children ages 12-15 years. Unlike other common childhood symptoms, RP showed no association with psychosocial. factors in this study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3518-3521
Number of pages4
JournalArthritis & Rheumatism
Volume48
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2003

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pain
  • Prevalence
  • Psychology
  • Raynaud Disease
  • Risk Factors
  • Seasons
  • Sex Distribution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occurrence of Raynaud's phenomenon in children ages 12-15 years: prevalence and association with other common symptoms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this