Offshore Risk Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Regimes in Ghana, the United Kingdom and Norway

Theophilus Acheampong, Rainer Akumperigya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper assesses Ghana's offshore health and safety regulatory regime in the context of international best practice in the upstream oil and gas industry. It contributes to the discussion of the emerging issue of offshore risk regulation in new petroleum producing countries. We present a comparative analysis contrasting two leading safety regimes namely the United Kingdom and Norway to Ghana’s emerging regime to benchmark common features as well as weaknesses. Our findings indicate that Ghana requires a robust regulatory regime that ensures that health and safety risks are properly delineated if the country is to avoid catastrophic accidents. This is especially important as these risks are more pronounced with deepwater operations such as those prevalent in the country’s petroleum basins. We propose the enactment of a general Health & Safety at Work law in Ghana backed by subsidiary regulations to harmonise the disjointed and sometimes incoherent health and safety provisions. Additionally, we propose that the health and safety regulatory function of the Ghana Petroleum Commission should be decoupled to form an independent Competent Authority as activity levels and the degree of complexity of operations increase to prevent conflict of interest between its regulatory and licensing functions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)701-710
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume113
Early online date21 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

health and safety
Health
petroleum
Crude oil
safety
general health
gas industry
oil industry
accident
Gas industry
regulation
analysis
Accidents
basin

Keywords

  • Risk regulation
  • Offshore health and safety
  • Safety ases
  • Goal setting regimes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Offshore Risk Regulation : A Comparative Analysis of Regimes in Ghana, the United Kingdom and Norway. / Acheampong, Theophilus; Akumperigya, Rainer.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 113, 02.2018, p. 701-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Acheampong, Theophilus ; Akumperigya, Rainer. / Offshore Risk Regulation : A Comparative Analysis of Regimes in Ghana, the United Kingdom and Norway. In: Energy Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 113. pp. 701-710.
@article{aa1285fc2839472bb23841c38684a833,
title = "Offshore Risk Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Regimes in Ghana, the United Kingdom and Norway",
abstract = "This paper assesses Ghana's offshore health and safety regulatory regime in the context of international best practice in the upstream oil and gas industry. It contributes to the discussion of the emerging issue of offshore risk regulation in new petroleum producing countries. We present a comparative analysis contrasting two leading safety regimes namely the United Kingdom and Norway to Ghana’s emerging regime to benchmark common features as well as weaknesses. Our findings indicate that Ghana requires a robust regulatory regime that ensures that health and safety risks are properly delineated if the country is to avoid catastrophic accidents. This is especially important as these risks are more pronounced with deepwater operations such as those prevalent in the country’s petroleum basins. We propose the enactment of a general Health & Safety at Work law in Ghana backed by subsidiary regulations to harmonise the disjointed and sometimes incoherent health and safety provisions. Additionally, we propose that the health and safety regulatory function of the Ghana Petroleum Commission should be decoupled to form an independent Competent Authority as activity levels and the degree of complexity of operations increase to prevent conflict of interest between its regulatory and licensing functions.",
keywords = "Risk regulation, Offshore health and safety, Safety ases, Goal setting regimes",
author = "Theophilus Acheampong and Rainer Akumperigya",
note = "We thank Professor Alex Kemp for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper that greatly improved the manuscript. We would also like to show our gratitude to Dr Ishmael Ackah who reviewed the paper and provided useful comments and recommendations. We are grateful to the referees who peer-reviewed the paper. Any errors remain our own.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.009",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "701--710",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Offshore Risk Regulation

T2 - A Comparative Analysis of Regimes in Ghana, the United Kingdom and Norway

AU - Acheampong, Theophilus

AU - Akumperigya, Rainer

N1 - We thank Professor Alex Kemp for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper that greatly improved the manuscript. We would also like to show our gratitude to Dr Ishmael Ackah who reviewed the paper and provided useful comments and recommendations. We are grateful to the referees who peer-reviewed the paper. Any errors remain our own.

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - This paper assesses Ghana's offshore health and safety regulatory regime in the context of international best practice in the upstream oil and gas industry. It contributes to the discussion of the emerging issue of offshore risk regulation in new petroleum producing countries. We present a comparative analysis contrasting two leading safety regimes namely the United Kingdom and Norway to Ghana’s emerging regime to benchmark common features as well as weaknesses. Our findings indicate that Ghana requires a robust regulatory regime that ensures that health and safety risks are properly delineated if the country is to avoid catastrophic accidents. This is especially important as these risks are more pronounced with deepwater operations such as those prevalent in the country’s petroleum basins. We propose the enactment of a general Health & Safety at Work law in Ghana backed by subsidiary regulations to harmonise the disjointed and sometimes incoherent health and safety provisions. Additionally, we propose that the health and safety regulatory function of the Ghana Petroleum Commission should be decoupled to form an independent Competent Authority as activity levels and the degree of complexity of operations increase to prevent conflict of interest between its regulatory and licensing functions.

AB - This paper assesses Ghana's offshore health and safety regulatory regime in the context of international best practice in the upstream oil and gas industry. It contributes to the discussion of the emerging issue of offshore risk regulation in new petroleum producing countries. We present a comparative analysis contrasting two leading safety regimes namely the United Kingdom and Norway to Ghana’s emerging regime to benchmark common features as well as weaknesses. Our findings indicate that Ghana requires a robust regulatory regime that ensures that health and safety risks are properly delineated if the country is to avoid catastrophic accidents. This is especially important as these risks are more pronounced with deepwater operations such as those prevalent in the country’s petroleum basins. We propose the enactment of a general Health & Safety at Work law in Ghana backed by subsidiary regulations to harmonise the disjointed and sometimes incoherent health and safety provisions. Additionally, we propose that the health and safety regulatory function of the Ghana Petroleum Commission should be decoupled to form an independent Competent Authority as activity levels and the degree of complexity of operations increase to prevent conflict of interest between its regulatory and licensing functions.

KW - Risk regulation

KW - Offshore health and safety

KW - Safety ases

KW - Goal setting regimes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037349407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.009

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 701

EP - 710

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -