Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm

Louise H Phillips, Roy Allen, Rebecca Bull, Alexandra Hering, Matthias Kliegel, Shelley Channon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
83 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Younger and older adults differ in performance on a range of social-cognitive skills, with older adults having difficulties in decoding nonverbal cues to emotion and intentions. Such skills are likely to be important when deciding whether someone is being sarcastic. In the current study we investigated in a life span sample whether there are age-related differences in the interpretation of sarcastic statements. Using both video and verbal materials, 116 participants aged between 18 and 86 completed judgments about whether statements should be interpreted literally or sarcastically. For the verbal stories task, older adults were poorer at understanding sarcastic intent compared with younger and middle-aged participants, but there was no age difference in interpreting control stories. For the video task, older adults showed poorer understanding of sarcastic exchanges compared with younger and middle-aged counterparts, but there was no age difference in understanding the meaning of sincere interactions. For the videos task, the age differences were mediated by the ability to perceive facial expressions of emotion. Age effects could not be explained in terms of variance in working memory. These results indicate that increased age is associated with specific difficulties in using nonverbal and contextual cues to understand sarcastic intent. (PsycINFO Database Record

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1840-1852
Number of pages13
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume51
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Cues
age difference
Emotions
Facial Expression
Aptitude
video
Short-Term Memory
Young Adult
emotion
facial expression
life-span
interpretation
ability
interaction
performance
Social Skills

Cite this

Phillips, L. H., Allen, R., Bull, R., Hering, A., Kliegel, M., & Channon, S. (2015). Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1840-1852. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000063

Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm. / Phillips, Louise H; Allen, Roy; Bull, Rebecca; Hering, Alexandra; Kliegel, Matthias; Channon, Shelley.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 12, 12.2015, p. 1840-1852.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phillips, LH, Allen, R, Bull, R, Hering, A, Kliegel, M & Channon, S 2015, 'Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm', Developmental Psychology, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1840-1852. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000063
Phillips LH, Allen R, Bull R, Hering A, Kliegel M, Channon S. Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm. Developmental Psychology. 2015 Dec;51(12):1840-1852. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000063
Phillips, Louise H ; Allen, Roy ; Bull, Rebecca ; Hering, Alexandra ; Kliegel, Matthias ; Channon, Shelley. / Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm. In: Developmental Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 51, No. 12. pp. 1840-1852.
@article{25dc3427ce954b12b77700f3ef8c20e4,
title = "Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm",
abstract = "Younger and older adults differ in performance on a range of social-cognitive skills, with older adults having difficulties in decoding nonverbal cues to emotion and intentions. Such skills are likely to be important when deciding whether someone is being sarcastic. In the current study we investigated in a life span sample whether there are age-related differences in the interpretation of sarcastic statements. Using both video and verbal materials, 116 participants aged between 18 and 86 completed judgments about whether statements should be interpreted literally or sarcastically. For the verbal stories task, older adults were poorer at understanding sarcastic intent compared with younger and middle-aged participants, but there was no age difference in interpreting control stories. For the video task, older adults showed poorer understanding of sarcastic exchanges compared with younger and middle-aged counterparts, but there was no age difference in understanding the meaning of sincere interactions. For the videos task, the age differences were mediated by the ability to perceive facial expressions of emotion. Age effects could not be explained in terms of variance in working memory. These results indicate that increased age is associated with specific difficulties in using nonverbal and contextual cues to understand sarcastic intent. (PsycINFO Database Record",
author = "Phillips, {Louise H} and Roy Allen and Rebecca Bull and Alexandra Hering and Matthias Kliegel and Shelley Channon",
note = "(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/dev0000063",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1840--1852",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm

AU - Phillips, Louise H

AU - Allen, Roy

AU - Bull, Rebecca

AU - Hering, Alexandra

AU - Kliegel, Matthias

AU - Channon, Shelley

N1 - (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Younger and older adults differ in performance on a range of social-cognitive skills, with older adults having difficulties in decoding nonverbal cues to emotion and intentions. Such skills are likely to be important when deciding whether someone is being sarcastic. In the current study we investigated in a life span sample whether there are age-related differences in the interpretation of sarcastic statements. Using both video and verbal materials, 116 participants aged between 18 and 86 completed judgments about whether statements should be interpreted literally or sarcastically. For the verbal stories task, older adults were poorer at understanding sarcastic intent compared with younger and middle-aged participants, but there was no age difference in interpreting control stories. For the video task, older adults showed poorer understanding of sarcastic exchanges compared with younger and middle-aged counterparts, but there was no age difference in understanding the meaning of sincere interactions. For the videos task, the age differences were mediated by the ability to perceive facial expressions of emotion. Age effects could not be explained in terms of variance in working memory. These results indicate that increased age is associated with specific difficulties in using nonverbal and contextual cues to understand sarcastic intent. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - Younger and older adults differ in performance on a range of social-cognitive skills, with older adults having difficulties in decoding nonverbal cues to emotion and intentions. Such skills are likely to be important when deciding whether someone is being sarcastic. In the current study we investigated in a life span sample whether there are age-related differences in the interpretation of sarcastic statements. Using both video and verbal materials, 116 participants aged between 18 and 86 completed judgments about whether statements should be interpreted literally or sarcastically. For the verbal stories task, older adults were poorer at understanding sarcastic intent compared with younger and middle-aged participants, but there was no age difference in interpreting control stories. For the video task, older adults showed poorer understanding of sarcastic exchanges compared with younger and middle-aged counterparts, but there was no age difference in understanding the meaning of sincere interactions. For the videos task, the age differences were mediated by the ability to perceive facial expressions of emotion. Age effects could not be explained in terms of variance in working memory. These results indicate that increased age is associated with specific difficulties in using nonverbal and contextual cues to understand sarcastic intent. (PsycINFO Database Record

U2 - 10.1037/dev0000063

DO - 10.1037/dev0000063

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1840

EP - 1852

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 12

ER -