On Mills' 'Jung's Metaphysics'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite his patient attempt to reconstruct Jung's metaphysics, Jon Mills fails to show that Jung was a metaphysician or even a philosopher of science and perhaps even a scientist. Mills seems to equate metaphysics with the postulation of immaterial entities - notably, archetypes. But on the one hand metaphysics can be materialist as well as dualist. On the other hand it is a speculative enterprise. A metaphysician would not simply announce the existence of immateriality but would seek to prove that immateriality fits the nature of reality as already known. Jung's metaphysics, which for him means sheer pronouncements, constitutes neither psychologism nor idealism, as Mills seems to agree. But Jung is not a Kantian, either. Jung should be treated as a great psychologist, but not as a thinker.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-226
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Jungian Studies
Volume6
Issue number3
Early online date10 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Metaphysics
Psychology

Keywords

  • dualism
  • epistemology
  • idealism
  • materialism
  • metaphysics
  • ontology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

On Mills' 'Jung's Metaphysics'. / Segal, Robert A.

In: International Journal of Jungian Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2014, p. 217-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d7c95ddb81e4262ad68ed1a0caee3b7,
title = "On Mills' 'Jung's Metaphysics'",
abstract = "Despite his patient attempt to reconstruct Jung's metaphysics, Jon Mills fails to show that Jung was a metaphysician or even a philosopher of science and perhaps even a scientist. Mills seems to equate metaphysics with the postulation of immaterial entities - notably, archetypes. But on the one hand metaphysics can be materialist as well as dualist. On the other hand it is a speculative enterprise. A metaphysician would not simply announce the existence of immateriality but would seek to prove that immateriality fits the nature of reality as already known. Jung's metaphysics, which for him means sheer pronouncements, constitutes neither psychologism nor idealism, as Mills seems to agree. But Jung is not a Kantian, either. Jung should be treated as a great psychologist, but not as a thinker.",
keywords = "dualism, epistemology, idealism, materialism, metaphysics, ontology",
author = "Segal, {Robert A.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/19409052.2014.921225",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "217--226",
journal = "International Journal of Jungian Studies",
issn = "1940-9052",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On Mills' 'Jung's Metaphysics'

AU - Segal, Robert A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Despite his patient attempt to reconstruct Jung's metaphysics, Jon Mills fails to show that Jung was a metaphysician or even a philosopher of science and perhaps even a scientist. Mills seems to equate metaphysics with the postulation of immaterial entities - notably, archetypes. But on the one hand metaphysics can be materialist as well as dualist. On the other hand it is a speculative enterprise. A metaphysician would not simply announce the existence of immateriality but would seek to prove that immateriality fits the nature of reality as already known. Jung's metaphysics, which for him means sheer pronouncements, constitutes neither psychologism nor idealism, as Mills seems to agree. But Jung is not a Kantian, either. Jung should be treated as a great psychologist, but not as a thinker.

AB - Despite his patient attempt to reconstruct Jung's metaphysics, Jon Mills fails to show that Jung was a metaphysician or even a philosopher of science and perhaps even a scientist. Mills seems to equate metaphysics with the postulation of immaterial entities - notably, archetypes. But on the one hand metaphysics can be materialist as well as dualist. On the other hand it is a speculative enterprise. A metaphysician would not simply announce the existence of immateriality but would seek to prove that immateriality fits the nature of reality as already known. Jung's metaphysics, which for him means sheer pronouncements, constitutes neither psychologism nor idealism, as Mills seems to agree. But Jung is not a Kantian, either. Jung should be treated as a great psychologist, but not as a thinker.

KW - dualism

KW - epistemology

KW - idealism

KW - materialism

KW - metaphysics

KW - ontology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905649349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19409052.2014.921225

DO - 10.1080/19409052.2014.921225

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 217

EP - 226

JO - International Journal of Jungian Studies

JF - International Journal of Jungian Studies

SN - 1940-9052

IS - 3

ER -