On percentile norms in neuropsychology: proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores

John R. Crawford, Paul H. Garthwaite, Daniel J. Slick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Normative data for neuropsychological tests are often presented in the form of percentiles. One problem when using percentile norms stems from uncertainty over the definitional formula for a percentile. (There are three co-existing definitions and these can produce substantially different results.) A second uncertainty stems from the use of a normative sample to estimate the standing of a raw score in the normative population. This uncertainty is unavoidable but its extent can be captured using methods developed in the present paper. A set of reporting standards for the presentation of percentile norms in neuropsychology is proposed. An accompanying computer program (available to download) implements these standards and generates tables of point and interval estimates of percentile ranks for new or existing normative data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1173-1195
Number of pages23
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • neuropsychological assessment
  • interval estimates
  • confidence intervals
  • credible intervals
  • test norms
  • non-normal data
  • percentile ranks
  • Bayesian methods
  • reporting standards
  • statistical reform
  • computer scoring
  • interval estimation
  • confidence-limits
  • proportion
  • samples

Cite this

On percentile norms in neuropsychology : proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores. / Crawford, John R.; Garthwaite, Paul H.; Slick, Daniel J.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2009, p. 1173-1195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc4486dd6b9c429bacb067978191aea5,
title = "On percentile norms in neuropsychology: proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores",
abstract = "Normative data for neuropsychological tests are often presented in the form of percentiles. One problem when using percentile norms stems from uncertainty over the definitional formula for a percentile. (There are three co-existing definitions and these can produce substantially different results.) A second uncertainty stems from the use of a normative sample to estimate the standing of a raw score in the normative population. This uncertainty is unavoidable but its extent can be captured using methods developed in the present paper. A set of reporting standards for the presentation of percentile norms in neuropsychology is proposed. An accompanying computer program (available to download) implements these standards and generates tables of point and interval estimates of percentile ranks for new or existing normative data.",
keywords = "neuropsychological assessment, interval estimates, confidence intervals, credible intervals, test norms, non-normal data, percentile ranks, Bayesian methods, reporting standards, statistical reform, computer scoring, interval estimation, confidence-limits, proportion, samples",
author = "Crawford, {John R.} and Garthwaite, {Paul H.} and Slick, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/13854040902795018",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1173--1195",
journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On percentile norms in neuropsychology

T2 - proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores

AU - Crawford, John R.

AU - Garthwaite, Paul H.

AU - Slick, Daniel J.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Normative data for neuropsychological tests are often presented in the form of percentiles. One problem when using percentile norms stems from uncertainty over the definitional formula for a percentile. (There are three co-existing definitions and these can produce substantially different results.) A second uncertainty stems from the use of a normative sample to estimate the standing of a raw score in the normative population. This uncertainty is unavoidable but its extent can be captured using methods developed in the present paper. A set of reporting standards for the presentation of percentile norms in neuropsychology is proposed. An accompanying computer program (available to download) implements these standards and generates tables of point and interval estimates of percentile ranks for new or existing normative data.

AB - Normative data for neuropsychological tests are often presented in the form of percentiles. One problem when using percentile norms stems from uncertainty over the definitional formula for a percentile. (There are three co-existing definitions and these can produce substantially different results.) A second uncertainty stems from the use of a normative sample to estimate the standing of a raw score in the normative population. This uncertainty is unavoidable but its extent can be captured using methods developed in the present paper. A set of reporting standards for the presentation of percentile norms in neuropsychology is proposed. An accompanying computer program (available to download) implements these standards and generates tables of point and interval estimates of percentile ranks for new or existing normative data.

KW - neuropsychological assessment

KW - interval estimates

KW - confidence intervals

KW - credible intervals

KW - test norms

KW - non-normal data

KW - percentile ranks

KW - Bayesian methods

KW - reporting standards

KW - statistical reform

KW - computer scoring

KW - interval estimation

KW - confidence-limits

KW - proportion

KW - samples

U2 - 10.1080/13854040902795018

DO - 10.1080/13854040902795018

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1173

EP - 1195

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 7

ER -