On the benefits of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogues (extended abstract)

Alice Toniolo, Timothy J Norman, Katia P Sycara

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

We present a model of argumentation-based deliberative dialogue for decision making in a team of agents. The model captures conflicts among agents' plans due to scheduling and causality constraints, and conflicts between actions, goals
and norms. We evaluate this model in complex collaborative planning problems to assess its ability to resolve such conflicts. We show that a model grounded on appropriate argumentation schemes facilitates the sharing of relevant information about plan, goal and norm conflicts. Our results show also that this information-sharing leads to more effective conflict resolution.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
PublisherIFAAMAS
Pages1409-1410
Number of pages2
Volume3
ISBN (Print)0-9817381-3-3, 0-9817381-3-0
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventAAMAS 12 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Valencia, Spain
Duration: 4 Jun 20128 Jun 2012

Conference

ConferenceAAMAS 12 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
CountrySpain
CityValencia
Period4/06/128/06/12

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Collective decision making
  • Planning

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the benefits of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogues (extended abstract)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Toniolo, A., Norman, T. J., & Sycara, K. P. (2012). On the benefits of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogues (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Vol. 3, pp. 1409-1410). IFAAMAS. http://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2012/papers/Z7_4.pdf