On the deformation of continental crust and Mike Coward’s impact on its understanding

Robert William Hope Butler, Rod Graham, Alison Ries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Understanding geological structure and structural evolution requires imagination, and the ability to see simple patterns in complex data and make the simplicity evident. It requires the transfer of insight and approach from one area of discipline (geographical or scientific) to another.
To Mike Coward it was second nature to do these things, and he stood out as one of the most innovative structural geologists of recent years. He was a great exponent of what is currently referred to as ‘up-scaling’: understanding the significance of small-scale, local observations and datasets then using them to elucidate geological evolution on a crustal scale. This introductory paper is a brief review of some key themes in the study of the deformation of the continental crust, and how Coward influenced them. It focuses particularly on thinking in structural geology during the past 50 years or so, but does not cover such topics as seismicity, geodetic data or microstructural approaches in deformation studies. The emphasis is on the importance of understanding medium- to large-scale structural geometry. This was Mike Coward’s forté, for it emphasizes the key role of field geology. The discipline of field mapping is a
great aid in the interpretation of 3D relationships in seismic data volumes. It is no coincidence that this account begins in the field but leads into seismic data. It is a journey followed not only by Mike Coward but also by many of the authors
contributing to this volume.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalGeological Society Special Publications
Volume272
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

continental crust
seismic data
Structural geology
geodetic datum
structural geology
Geology
geological structure
seismicity
aid
geology
geometry
Geometry

Cite this

On the deformation of continental crust and Mike Coward’s impact on its understanding. / Butler, Robert William Hope; Graham, Rod; Ries, Alison.

In: Geological Society Special Publications , Vol. 272, 2007, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d84635061e54017bfaa9efeeeec0a88,
title = "On the deformation of continental crust and Mike Coward’s impact on its understanding",
abstract = "Understanding geological structure and structural evolution requires imagination, and the ability to see simple patterns in complex data and make the simplicity evident. It requires the transfer of insight and approach from one area of discipline (geographical or scientific) to another.To Mike Coward it was second nature to do these things, and he stood out as one of the most innovative structural geologists of recent years. He was a great exponent of what is currently referred to as ‘up-scaling’: understanding the significance of small-scale, local observations and datasets then using them to elucidate geological evolution on a crustal scale. This introductory paper is a brief review of some key themes in the study of the deformation of the continental crust, and how Coward influenced them. It focuses particularly on thinking in structural geology during the past 50 years or so, but does not cover such topics as seismicity, geodetic data or microstructural approaches in deformation studies. The emphasis is on the importance of understanding medium- to large-scale structural geometry. This was Mike Coward’s fort{\'e}, for it emphasizes the key role of field geology. The discipline of field mapping is agreat aid in the interpretation of 3D relationships in seismic data volumes. It is no coincidence that this account begins in the field but leads into seismic data. It is a journey followed not only by Mike Coward but also by many of the authorscontributing to this volume.",
author = "Butler, {Robert William Hope} and Rod Graham and Alison Ries",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "272",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Geological Society Special Publications",
issn = "0305-8719",
publisher = "Geological Society of London",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the deformation of continental crust and Mike Coward’s impact on its understanding

AU - Butler, Robert William Hope

AU - Graham, Rod

AU - Ries, Alison

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Understanding geological structure and structural evolution requires imagination, and the ability to see simple patterns in complex data and make the simplicity evident. It requires the transfer of insight and approach from one area of discipline (geographical or scientific) to another.To Mike Coward it was second nature to do these things, and he stood out as one of the most innovative structural geologists of recent years. He was a great exponent of what is currently referred to as ‘up-scaling’: understanding the significance of small-scale, local observations and datasets then using them to elucidate geological evolution on a crustal scale. This introductory paper is a brief review of some key themes in the study of the deformation of the continental crust, and how Coward influenced them. It focuses particularly on thinking in structural geology during the past 50 years or so, but does not cover such topics as seismicity, geodetic data or microstructural approaches in deformation studies. The emphasis is on the importance of understanding medium- to large-scale structural geometry. This was Mike Coward’s forté, for it emphasizes the key role of field geology. The discipline of field mapping is agreat aid in the interpretation of 3D relationships in seismic data volumes. It is no coincidence that this account begins in the field but leads into seismic data. It is a journey followed not only by Mike Coward but also by many of the authorscontributing to this volume.

AB - Understanding geological structure and structural evolution requires imagination, and the ability to see simple patterns in complex data and make the simplicity evident. It requires the transfer of insight and approach from one area of discipline (geographical or scientific) to another.To Mike Coward it was second nature to do these things, and he stood out as one of the most innovative structural geologists of recent years. He was a great exponent of what is currently referred to as ‘up-scaling’: understanding the significance of small-scale, local observations and datasets then using them to elucidate geological evolution on a crustal scale. This introductory paper is a brief review of some key themes in the study of the deformation of the continental crust, and how Coward influenced them. It focuses particularly on thinking in structural geology during the past 50 years or so, but does not cover such topics as seismicity, geodetic data or microstructural approaches in deformation studies. The emphasis is on the importance of understanding medium- to large-scale structural geometry. This was Mike Coward’s forté, for it emphasizes the key role of field geology. The discipline of field mapping is agreat aid in the interpretation of 3D relationships in seismic data volumes. It is no coincidence that this account begins in the field but leads into seismic data. It is a journey followed not only by Mike Coward but also by many of the authorscontributing to this volume.

M3 - Article

VL - 272

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Geological Society Special Publications

JF - Geological Society Special Publications

SN - 0305-8719

ER -