On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

Martinus Wigbertus Antonius Caminada; Samy Sá; João Alcântara; Wolfgang Dvořák

On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

Martinus Wigbertus Antonius Caminada, Samy Sá, João Alcântara, Wolfgang Dvořák

Computing Science

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold.

Original language	English
Publisher	University of Aberdeen
Volume	ABDN–CS–1213XX
Publication status	Published - Sep 2013

Cite this

@techreport{2545370d4c424fc5bce6953d51ba92b3,

title = "On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation",

abstract = "In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold.",

author = "Caminada, {Martinus Wigbertus Antonius} and Samy S{\'a} and Jo{\~a}o Alc{\^a}ntara and Wolfgang Dvo{\v r}{\'a}k",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

language = "English",

volume = "ABDN–CS–1213XX",

publisher = "University of Aberdeen",

address = "United Kingdom",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "University of Aberdeen",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

AU - Caminada, Martinus Wigbertus Antonius

AU - Sá, Samy

AU - Alcântara, João

AU - Dvořák, Wolfgang

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold.

AB - In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold.

M3 - Working paper

VL - ABDN–CS–1213XX

BT - On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

PB - University of Aberdeen

ER -

On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this