On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

Martinus Wigbertus Antonius Caminada, Samy Sá, João Alcântara, Wolfgang Dvořák

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Pages25-32
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventThe 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2013) - , Netherlands
Duration: 7 Nov 2013 → …

Conference

ConferenceThe 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2013)
CountryNetherlands
Period7/11/13 → …

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Caminada, M. W. A., Sá, S., Alcântara, J., & Dvořák, W. (2013). On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 25-32)