On the validity of neural mass models

Nicolas Deschle* (Corresponding Author), Juan Ignacio Gossn, Prejaas Tewarie, Bjoern Schelter, Andreas Daffertshofer* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Modeling the dynamics of neural masses is a common approach in the study of neural populations. Various models have been proven useful to describe a plenitude of empirical observations including self-sustained local oscillations and patterns of distant synchronization. We discuss the extent to which mass models really resemble the mean dynamics of a neural population. In particular, we question the validity of neural mass models if the population under study comprises a mixture of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that are densely (inter-)connected. Starting from a network of noisy leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, we formulated two different population dynamics that both fall into the category of seminal Freeman neural mass models. The derivations contained several mean-field assumptions and time scale separation(s) between membrane and synapse dynamics. Our comparison of these neural mass models with the averaged dynamics of the population reveals bounds in the fraction of excitatory/inhibitory neuron as well as overall network degree for a mass model to provide adequate estimates. For substantial parameter ranges, our models fail to mimic the neural network's dynamics proper, be that in de-synchronized or in (high-frequency) synchronized states. Only around the onset of low-frequency synchronization our models provide proper estimates of the mean potential dynamics. While this shows their potential for, e.g., studying resting state dynamics obtained by encephalography with focus on the transition region, we must accept that predicting the more general dynamic outcome of a neural network via its mass dynamics requires great care.
Original languageEnglish
Article number581040
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Volume14
Early online date5 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

FUNDING
This study received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement #642563 (COSMOS).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ND and AD want to thank Rok Cestnik and Bastian Pietras for fruitful discussions

Keywords

  • neural mass model
  • leakly integrate and fire
  • random graph
  • mean field approximation
  • Freeman model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the validity of neural mass models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this