ON THINKING THEOLOGICALLY ABOUT ANIMALS: A RESPONSE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

with David Fergusson, “God, Christ, and Animals”; Margaret B. Adam, “The Particularity of Animals and of Jesus Christ”; Christopher Carter, “The Imago Dei as the Mind of Jesus Christ”; Stephen H. Webb, “Toward a Weak Anthropocentrism”; and David Clough, “On Thinking Theologically about Animals: A Response.”

In response to evaluations of On Animals: Volume 1, Systematic Theology by Margaret Adams, Christopher Carter, David Fergusson, and Stephen Webb, this article argues that the theological reappraisals of key doctrines argued for in the book are important for an adequate theological discussion of animals. The article addresses critical points raised by these authors in relation to the creation of human beings in the image of God, the doctrine of the incarnation, the theological ordering of creatures, anthropocentrism, and the doctrine of God. It concludes that, given previous neglect, much more discussion by theologians is required in order to think better concerning the place of animals in Christian theology, but acting better toward fellow animal creatures is an important next step toward this goal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)764-771
JournalZygon®
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ON THINKING THEOLOGICALLY ABOUT ANIMALS: A RESPONSE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this