Open Access Publishing: A Service or a Detriment to Science?

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming 4 increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of access publishing from the perspectives of 5 authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access 6 for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its 7 aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to 8 publishing, the rise in predatory journals and degradation of quality control, and the consequent 9 potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. There is a need for greater for 10 greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, the promotion of benign open access options (e.g. 11 avoidance of predatory journals), and to ensure that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of 12 publishing. Given the recognised importance of “crafting the message”, i.e. communicating 13 scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked 14 why the “one size fits all” solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (the format of 15 which is still off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Aberdeen Business School
Number of pages29
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Publication series

NameDiscussion Paper in Economics
PublisherUniversity of Aberdeen
No.3
Volume18
ISSN (Electronic)0143-4543

Fingerprint

Open access
Politicians
Ownership
Economics
Avoidance
Payment
Degradation
Disadvantage
Costs
Damage
End users
Funding
Quality control

Keywords

  • open access
  • perception
  • reputation
  • costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Theodossiou, I., & Pierce, G. (2018). Open Access Publishing: A Service or a Detriment to Science? (Discussion Paper in Economics; Vol. 18, No. 3). University of Aberdeen Business School.

Open Access Publishing : A Service or a Detriment to Science? / Theodossiou, Ioannis; Pierce, Graham.

University of Aberdeen Business School, 2018. (Discussion Paper in Economics; Vol. 18, No. 3).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Theodossiou, I & Pierce, G 2018 'Open Access Publishing: A Service or a Detriment to Science?' Discussion Paper in Economics, no. 3, vol. 18, University of Aberdeen Business School.
Theodossiou I, Pierce G. Open Access Publishing: A Service or a Detriment to Science? University of Aberdeen Business School. 2018 May. (Discussion Paper in Economics; 3).
Theodossiou, Ioannis ; Pierce, Graham. / Open Access Publishing : A Service or a Detriment to Science?. University of Aberdeen Business School, 2018. (Discussion Paper in Economics; 3).
@techreport{a2059b3e446b4758acd06a45d0fbc902,
title = "Open Access Publishing: A Service or a Detriment to Science?",
abstract = "The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming 4 increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of access publishing from the perspectives of 5 authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access 6 for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its 7 aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to 8 publishing, the rise in predatory journals and degradation of quality control, and the consequent 9 potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. There is a need for greater for 10 greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, the promotion of benign open access options (e.g. 11 avoidance of predatory journals), and to ensure that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of 12 publishing. Given the recognised importance of “crafting the message”, i.e. communicating 13 scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked 14 why the “one size fits all” solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (the format of 15 which is still off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary.",
keywords = "open access, perception, reputation, costs",
author = "Ioannis Theodossiou and Graham Pierce",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
language = "English",
series = "Discussion Paper in Economics",
publisher = "University of Aberdeen Business School",
number = "3",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Aberdeen Business School",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Open Access Publishing

T2 - A Service or a Detriment to Science?

AU - Theodossiou, Ioannis

AU - Pierce, Graham

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming 4 increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of access publishing from the perspectives of 5 authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access 6 for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its 7 aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to 8 publishing, the rise in predatory journals and degradation of quality control, and the consequent 9 potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. There is a need for greater for 10 greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, the promotion of benign open access options (e.g. 11 avoidance of predatory journals), and to ensure that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of 12 publishing. Given the recognised importance of “crafting the message”, i.e. communicating 13 scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked 14 why the “one size fits all” solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (the format of 15 which is still off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary.

AB - The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming 4 increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of access publishing from the perspectives of 5 authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access 6 for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its 7 aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to 8 publishing, the rise in predatory journals and degradation of quality control, and the consequent 9 potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. There is a need for greater for 10 greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, the promotion of benign open access options (e.g. 11 avoidance of predatory journals), and to ensure that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of 12 publishing. Given the recognised importance of “crafting the message”, i.e. communicating 13 scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked 14 why the “one size fits all” solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (the format of 15 which is still off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary.

KW - open access

KW - perception

KW - reputation

KW - costs

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - Discussion Paper in Economics

BT - Open Access Publishing

PB - University of Aberdeen Business School

ER -